Court Cases Flashcards
Marbury v. Madison
- Federalist, William Marbury was appointed justice of the peace. Others as well were appointed in the final days of John Adams’ presidency, but the appointments weren’t finalized. The appointees sued for their jobs in Supreme Court
- est. judicial review
- gave power to judicial branch; power of Supreme Ct. to declare Congress acts unconstitutional
McCulloch v. MD
- 1816- Congress charteres 2nd Bank of US. 1818- MD passed legislation to tax the bank.McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the bank, refused to pay the tax
- Congress can use its implied powers to carry out expressed powers
- national gov. over states
- states can’t interfere with/tax federal gov. activities
Gibbons v. Ogden
-NY law gave individuals the right to operate steamboats on waters w/in state jurisdiction. Other states adopted the law → conflict b/c some states required foreign boats to pay fees for navigation privileges. Gibbons, a steamboat owner who did business b/w NY & NJ
-federal gov. ability to regulate interstate congress
commerce clause → expansion of fed power
Plessy v. Ferguson
- Louisiana enacted a law that required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Plessy who was seven-eighths Caucasian took a seat in a “whites only” car & refused to move –> was arrested.
- case questioned Louisiana’s law mandating racial segregation on its trains and questioned if it was an unconstitutional infringement on both the privileges and immunities and the equal protection clauses of the 14th Amend?
- separate but =
- (upheld Jim Crow laws).
Weeks v. US
- Police entered Weeks’ home w/o search warrant and seized papers, which were used to convict him of transporting lottery tickets through the mail.
- Weeks petitioned for the return of his private possessions. -violated 4th Amendment?
- In a unanimous decision, the Court held that the seizure violated his constitutional rights & refusal to return possessions defied 4th Amendment.
- est. exclusionary rule in federal cases and prohibited evidence obtained by illegal searches and seizures from being admitted in court
Schenck v. US
- WWI- Schenck mailed circulars to draftees that suggested that the draft was wrong and motivated by the capitalist system. Advised only peaceful action to repeal the Conscription Act.
- Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act
- Schenck’s actions were protected by the free speech clause of 1st Amendment?
- The Court concluded that Schenck was not protected in this situation and that the character of every act depends on the circumstances. They ruled that free speech could be limited when it presents a “clear and present danger” & est. the “clear and present danger” test to define conditions under which public authorities can limit free speech.
Gitlow v. NY
- Gitlow, a socialist, arrested for distributing a manifesto that called for socialism through strikes and class action of any form. convicted under a state criminal anarchy law, which punished advocating the overthrow of the government by force.
- violation of the free speech clause of the 1st Amend?
- decided state may forbid both speech and publication if they have a tendency to result in action dangerous to public security, even though such utterances create no clear and present danger.
- precedent for selective incorporation, thus extending most of the requirements of the bill of Rights to the states.
Near v. Minnesota
- Near published a scandal sheet in Minneapolis, in which he attacked local officials, charging that they were implicated with gangsters. Minnesota prevented Near from publishing his newspaper under a state law
- did Minnesota “gag law” violate free press in 1st Amend?
- The Supreme Court held that the statute authorizing the injunction was unconstitutional as applied. Government could not censor or otherwise prohibit a publication in advance, even though the communication might be punishable after publication in a criminal or other proceeding.
Palko v. CT
- Frank Palko killed 2 cops after robbing a music store and had been charged with 1st-degree murder but instead was convicted of the lesser charge of 2nd-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison
- CT won new trial; this time the court found Palko guilty of 1st-degree murder and sentenced him to death.
- did Palko’s 2nd conviction violate the protection against double jeopardy guaranteed by the 5th amend because this protection applies to the states by virtue of the 14th Amend’s due process clause?
- The Supreme Court upheld Palko’s 2nd conviction. Protection against double jeopardy was not a fundamental right. Palko died in CT electric chair
Korematsu v. US
- WWII, Presidential Executive Order (9066) gave the military authority to send Japanese citizens to relocation camps.
- Korematsu remained in San Leandro, California; was arrested and convicted. He argued that the order violated his 5th amend right.
- did President and Congress go beyond their war powers by implementing exclusion and restricting rights?
- The Court sided with the government and held that the need to protect against espionage outweighed Korematsu’s rights, they argued that compulsory exclusion, though constitutionally suspect, is justified during circumstances such as wartime (necessity).
Brown v. BOE 1
-Black children were denied admission to public schools attended by white children under laws permitting segregation.
-segregation illegal, violates 14th amendt
reversed Plessy v. Ferguson “separate but equal”
Brown v. BOE 2
- Court convened to issue directives which would implement the new principle.
- “all deliberate speed”
Roth v. US
- Roth operated a book-selling business in NY and was convicted of mailing obscene books violating a federal obscenity statute. Roth’s case was combined with Alberts v. California, a similar case which involved advertisements for obscene books.
- ruled that obscenity is not protected free speech
- “prevailing community standards” requires consideration of the work as a whole
Mapp v. Ohio
- Dollree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive. She appealed her conviction on the basis of freedom of expression.
- extended exclusionary rule to states
- selective incorporation through 14th amendment
Engel v. Vitale
- The Board of Regents for NY authorized a voluntary prayer for recitation at the start of each school day to defuse the contentious issue by taking it out of the hands of local communities.
- prohibited state-sponsored prayer in schools
- Regent’s prayer- unconstitutional violation of Est. clause