Court cases Flashcards

1
Q

What were the facts of the case in United States v. Lopez (1995)?

A

Alfonso Lopez Jr. was charged for bringing a concealed handgun to his high school in San Antonio, Texas. He was initially charged under Texas law, but later under the Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1990.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What specific amendment and/or clause from the Constitution is in question in United States v. Lopez (1995)?

A

Article I, Section 8 Commerce Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the ruling of the Court in United States v. Lopez (1995)?

A

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Lopez, striking down the Gun-Free School Zones Act as unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the reasoning behind the Court’s ruling in United States v. Lopez (1995)?

A

The Court held that Congress exceeded its commerce clause power, as the possession of a firearm in a school zone did not have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the facts of the case in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)?

A

The state of Maryland attempted to tax the Second Bank of the United States, arguing that the federal government did not have the constitutional authority to establish a national bank.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What specific amendment and/or clause from the Constitution is in question in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)?

A

Article I, Section 8 Necessary and Proper Clause; Article VI Supremacy Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the ruling of the Court in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)?

A

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously (7-0) in favor of McCulloch, holding that Congress had the power to create a national bank under the Elastic Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the reasoning behind the Court’s ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)?

A

Maryland could not tax the bank due to the Supremacy Clause, which establishes that federal law is superior to state law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the facts of the case in McDonald v. Chicago (2010)?

A

Otis McDonald challenged Chicago’s strict handgun ban, arguing it violated his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What specific amendment and/or clause from the Constitution is in question in McDonald v. Chicago (2010)?

A

Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms; Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Selective Incorporation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the ruling of the Court in McDonald v. Chicago (2010)?

A

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of McDonald, holding that the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the facts of the case in Gitlow v. New York (1925)?

A

Benjamin Gitlow was arrested for distributing a pamphlet called the ‘Left Wing Manifesto,’ advocating for the violent overthrow of the government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What specific amendment and/or clause from the Constitution is in question in Gitlow v. New York (1925)?

A

First Amendment Freedom of Speech and Press; Fourteenth Amendment Due Process (Selective Incorporation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the ruling of the Court in Gitlow v. New York (1925)?

A

The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 against Gitlow, upholding his conviction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the reasoning behind the Court’s ruling in Gitlow v. New York (1925)?

A

States could limit speech if it posed a ‘clear and present danger’ to public safety, applying the precedent set in Schenck v. United States (1919).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the facts of the case in Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)?

A

Members of the Amish community, led by Jonas Yoder, refused to send their children to school beyond 8th grade, arguing it violated their religious beliefs.

17
Q

What specific amendment and/or clause from the Constitution is in question in Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)?

A

First Amendment Free Exercise Clause; Due Process Clause

18
Q

What was the ruling of the Court in Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)?

A

The Supreme Court ruled 7-0 in favor of Yoder, holding that forcing Amish children to attend school beyond 8th grade violated their First Amendment right to freely exercise their religion.

19
Q

What was the primary issue in the case of N.Y. Times v. United States (1971)?

A

The primary issue was whether the government could prevent the New York Times and Washington Post from publishing classified Pentagon papers that revealed U.S. involvement in Vietnam.

20
Q

What did the Nixon administration argue in N.Y. Times v. United States?

A

The Nixon administration argued that publishing the documents posed a national security risk.

21
Q

Which amendment is in question in N.Y. Times v. United States?

A

First Amendment - Freedom of the press.

22
Q

What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in N.Y. Times v. United States?

A

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of the New York Times, stating the government failed to prove the publications would cause direct immediate harm to national security.

23
Q

What principle regarding government censorship was established in N.Y. Times v. United States?

A

Prior restraints (government censorship before publication) were deemed unconstitutional in this case.

24
Q

What was the significance of the ruling in N.Y. Times v. United States for democracy?

A

The ruling emphasized that freedom of the press is essential for democracy and preventing publication could set a dangerous precedent for government overreach.

25
Q

What were the facts of the case in Marbury v. Madison (1803)?

A

William Marbury was appointed as a ‘midnight judge’ by John Adams, but Thomas Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, refused to deliver his commission.

26
Q

What legal action did Marbury take in Marbury v. Madison?

A

Marbury sued asking the Supreme Court to issue a court order forcing Madison to deliver the commission.

27
Q

Which article and section of the Constitution is in question in Marbury v. Madison?

A

Article III, Section 2 - Judicial Review & Supreme Court Powers.

28
Q

What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in Marbury v. Madison?

A

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously (4-0) against Marbury, holding that while he had a right to his commission, the Court did not have the power to issue a writ of mandamus because the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional.

29
Q

What principle was established by the ruling in Marbury v. Madison?

A

The principle of judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to strike down laws that violate the Constitution.

30
Q

What were the facts of the case in Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969)?

A

Students, including Mary Beth Tinker and John Tinker, wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, and were suspended by school officials who argued it disrupted the learning environment.

31
Q

What was the legal claim made by the students in Tinker v. Des Moines?

A

The students claimed their First Amendment right to free speech was violated.

32
Q

Which amendments are in question in Tinker v. Des Moines?

A

First Amendment - Freedom of speech (symbolic speech); Fourteenth Amendment - Due process clause.

33
Q

What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines?

A

The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in favor of Tinker, stating that students do not lose their First Amendment rights at school.

34
Q

What standard did the Court establish regarding speech in schools in Tinker v. Des Moines?

A

Schools could only restrict speech if it caused a substantial disruption.

35
Q

What were the facts of the case in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)?

A

Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with breaking and entering and could not afford an attorney, asking the court to appoint one for him.

36
Q

What was the legal issue Gideon faced in Gideon v. Wainwright?

A

The state of Florida only provided court-appointed lawyers for defendants in capital cases, forcing Gideon to represent himself.

37
Q

Which amendments are in question in Gideon v. Wainwright?

A

Sixth Amendment - Right to counsel; Fourteenth Amendment - Due process clause (selective incorporation).

38
Q

What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright?

A

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9-0) in favor of Gideon, holding that the right to legal counsel is fundamental.

39
Q

What does the ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright establish regarding defendants?

A

Defendants who cannot afford an attorney must be provided one in state criminal trials.