Couples Flashcards
THE DOMESTIC DIVISION OF LABOUR
Parsons
In the traditional nuclear family, the roles of husbands and wives are segregated
In Talcott Parsons’ (1955) functionalist model of the family there is a clear division of labour between spouses:
The husband has an instrumental role: geared towards achieving success at work so he can provide for the family financially. He is the breadwinner
The wife has an expressive role: geared towards primary socialisation of the children and meeting the family’s emotional needs. She is the homemaker, a full-time housewife rather than wage earner
Parson argues division of labour is based on biological differences
Women naturally suited towards nurturing role
Claims division is beneficial for both women and men, children and wider society
Criticisms of Parsons roles
Michael young and Peter Willmott (1962) argue men now taking a greater share of domestic tasks and more wives becoming wage earners
Feminist reject Parsons’ views that it’s natural - argue only benefits men
Joint and segregated roles
Elizabeth Bott (1957) distinguishes between two types of conjugal roles within marriage:
Segregated conjugal roles: couple have separate roles
Male - breadwinner
Female - homemaker/carer
Leisure activities tend to be separate
Joint conjugal roles: couples share tasks
Spend leisure time together
Young and Willmott identified pattern of segregated conjugal roles in study of traditional working-class extended families in Bethnal Green, east London in the 1950s Men - breadwinners, little part in homelife, leisure time with work mates in pubs/clubs Women - full-time housewives, responsibility was housework/childcare, limited leisure and was spent with female kin
The symmetrical family
Young and willmott (1973) - march of progress view
Family life gradually improving for all members
Becoming more equal, democratic
Argue - long term trend away from segregated conjugal roles and towards joint and symmetrical family
Symmetrical family - roles not identical but similar
Women now go to work although mainly part-time
Men help out with housework and childcare
Spend leisure time together
In study of london - symmetrical family more common among younger couples, geographically isolated and the more affluent
They see rise of this as result of major changes during past century:
Changes in women’s position
Geographical mobility - living away from communities where they grew up
New technology and labour saving devices
Higher standards of living
Interlinked - women bringing in second wage raises standard of living - afford labour saving devices - housework easier - encourages men to do more
A feminist view of housework
Reject march of progress view
Argue little has changed - women still do most housework
See this inequality as stemming from fact that family and society is male-dominated or patriarchal
Women occupy subordinate and dependent role within family and wider society
A feminist view of housework
Ann Oakley (1974)
Ann Oakley (1974) criticises Young and Willmott’s view family is symmetrical. Argues claims are exaggerated Y+W found husbands helped at least once a week but could be taking children for walk, or making breakfast - Oakley found this hardly convincing evidence
In her own research of housewives - found some husbands help but no trend towards symmetry
Only 15% of husbands had high level of participation in housework
25% high participation in childcare
Husbands only took part in pleasurable aspects of childcare - “take them off her hands on sunday morning”
Defined father’s role as one of “taking an interest”
Mothers often lost rewards of childcare - left with more time for housework
A feminist view of housework
Mary Boulton (1983)
Research supports Oakley
20% husbands major role in childcare
Argues W+Y exaggerate men’s contributions by looking at tasks rather than responsibilities - mother was always responsible men would help with specific tasks
A feminist view of housework
Alan Warde and Kevin Hetherington (1993)
found sex typing of domestic tasks remained strong
Wives 30 times more likely to be last person to do washing
Husbands four times more likely to be last to wash car
In general they found men would carry out routine female tasks when partners were not around
However, found slight change of attitude among younger men
ARE COUPLES BECOMING MORE EQUAL?
The impact of paid work
Oakley
Oakley’s study 1970s - most women full-time housewives
Today - more wives go out to work
Is it leading to equal distribution or do wives have a “dual burden”
The march of progress view
Jonathan Gershuny (1994)
argues that women working full-time is leading to more equal division of labour. Using time studies - these women do less domestic work than other women
The march of progress view
Oreil Sullivan’s (2000)
analysis of nationally representative data collected in 1975, 1987, 1997 found trend towards women doing smaller share of domestic work and men doing more
Also showed increase in couples with equal division - men participating more in traditional women’s tasks
The march of progress view
British Social Attitudes survey (2013)
Trends reflect changes in attitudes
found fall in people who think man’s job is to earn money and women’s to look after home/family
1984 - 45% men 41% women agreed with view
2012 - 13% men agreed 12% women agreed
The feminist view
British Social Attitudes survey
How much do men do?
2012 - on average 8 hours of housework a week, women did 13 hours
Men spent 10 hours on childcare, women spent 23 hours
Overall women did twice as much
60% of women felt division was unjust - doing more than fair share
The feminist view
British Social Attitudes survey
Who does what?
Divide tasks along traditional gender lines
Women much more likely to do laundry, grocery shop, clean, prepare meals
Men - repairs around house
These patterns are very similar to that of 1994
The feminist view
Graham Allan (1985)
The survey does not measure the qualitative differences in the tasks performed.
Graham Allen (1985) argues women’s tasks such as washing and cleaning are less intrinsically satisfying