costs Flashcards
can a non-party be ordered to pay costs
yes if real interested party in the litigation or they were responsible for bringing the proceedings
would need to add as party to proceedings before making order
does a third party need to have acted improperly to make a non-party costs order
no
which cases are eligible for qualified one-way cost shifting
personal injury only
what is qualified one-way cost shifting
when C is unsuccessful and ordered to pay Ds costs but D cannot enforce this without permission of the court
when is qualified one-way cost shifting used
when judge thinks that the claim was fundamentally dishonest
If C wins can qualified one-way cost shifting apply
no - D would still be required to pay Cs costs
process for detailed assessment of costs
within 3 months of judgement receiving party must serve notice of commencement of detailed assessment
paying party has 21 days to serve dispute
receiving party has 21 days to reply
receiving party must file request for hearing within 3 months of end of period for commencing proceedings (6 months from judgement)
if costs claimed are less than £75K provisional assessment decides what costs are allowed
if either party unhappy with provisional assessment can request hearing but unless 20% change in their favour they pay costs
how are costs assessed in interim proceedings
summary assessment
requirements of costs awarded on standard basis
proportionate, reasonable incurred and reasonable in amount
when are costs proportionate
bear a reasonable relationship to the sums in issue,
the value of any non-monetary relief in issue
complexity of litigation
any extra work generated by conduct of paying party
any wider factors
what happens if the cost is not reasonable in amount
recovered but reduced
what happens if the cost is not reasonably incurred
disallowed so cannot recover it
what happens if the cost is not proportionate
may be disallowed or reduced
difference between indemnity basis and standard basis
standard - doubt resolved in favour of paying party and costs must be proportionate
indemnity - doubt resolved in favour of receiving party and NO proportionality requirement
requirements of costs awarded on indemnity basis
must be reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount but NO proportionality test
when would a party seek security for costs
sought by D if they’re worried about costs
requirements for an order for security of costs
just and part 25 condition met
part 25 conditions for security for costs order
C outside EU
C is an impecunious company (reason to believe C won’t be able to pay Ds costs if ordered)
C taken steps to make recovery / enforcement difficult
factors considered when determining if it would be just to make a security for costs order
strength of claim and defence C's ability to provide security causes of Cs impecuniousity property within jurisdiction timing of application
requirements to be met if a part 36 offer is to be valid
written make clear it is part 36 offer set out relevant period if it is whole/part claim if it takes account of counter claim
what happens when a part 36 offer is accepted
proceedings are stayed to allow for payment
what is the relevant period
min 21 days during which if part 36 offer is accepted D will pay Cs costs
when is a part 36 offer made
when it is served on the other party
is a part 36 offer inclusive of interest
only until day 21
is part 36 offer without prejudice
without prejudice save as to costs - so it only impacts costs