Cosmological arguments from causation Flashcards

1
Q

Q: From whose theory are Aquinas’ first two ways developed?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: Aristotle’s theory of efficient causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Q: What does Aristotle’s theory of efficient causation attempt to explain?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: The change we observe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q: According to Aristotle, what does change require?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: A prime mover which sustains the motion and causation we experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Q: What is efficient causation?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: The concept of sustaining causes, those which bring about their effect continuously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Q: What happens if a sustaining cause ceases to exist?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: Its effect would also cease to exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q: Give an example of efficient causation.

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: The gravity of the earth causes the moon to be in orbit, which in turn causes the sea tides to rise and fall on earth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Q: What is the focus of Aquinas’ first way?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: The argument from motion, which states that everything in motion must be put in motion by something else.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Q: What is the focus of Aquinas’ second way?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: The argument from causation, which states that every effect has a cause, and there cannot be an infinite regress of causes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Q: How does Aquinas use the concept of a prime mover in his first way?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: He argues that there must be a first unmoved mover (God) who initiates all motion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Q: How does Aquinas use the concept of a first cause in his second way?

Aquinas’ first and second ways

A

A: He argues that there must be a first uncaused cause (God) who initiates all causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q: What is the first premise (P1) of Aquinas’ first way?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: We observe that there are things in motion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q: How does Aquinas define motion in the second premise (P2)?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: Motion is the actualization of a thing’s potential to be in motion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q: What does the third premise (P3) state about motion?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: A thing can only come to be in motion by being moved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Q: According to the fourth premise (P4), what must a mover be?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

Q: According to the fourth premise (P4), what must a mover be?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Q: What does the fifth premise (P5) say about self-movement?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: A thing cannot move itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Q: What conclusion (C1) does Aquinas draw from premises P1 to P5?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: All things in motion must have been moved by a mover, which was also moved by another mover.

17
Q

Q: Why does Aquinas reject an infinite regress of movers in the sixth premise (P6)?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: There cannot be an infinite regress of movers, otherwise there would be no first mover and then no motion.

18
Q

Q: What final conclusion (C2) does Aquinas reach?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: Therefore, there must be a first mover which must itself be unmoved (as it is pure actuality). That thing we call God.

19
Q

Q: Why is a thing that is purely actual with no potential significant in Aquinas’ argument?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: It cannot change and is an unmoved mover or uncaused causer.

20
Q

Q: How does change relate to potential and actual in Aquinas’ argument?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: Change requires going from potential to actual, which depends on something that is actual and cannot depend merely on other potential things.

21
Q

Q: What is meant by “pure actuality” in Aquinas’ first way?

Aquinas’ 1st way (motion)

A

A: Pure actuality refers to a being that has no potential and is fully actualized, meaning it cannot change and is the unmoved mover.

22
Q

Q: What is the first premise (P1) of Aquinas’ second way?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: We observe efficient causation.

23
Q

Q: According to the second premise (P2), what is impossible in terms of causation?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: Nothing can cause itself.

24
Q

Q: What does the third premise (P3) state about the order of sustaining causes?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: There is a logical order to sustaining causes: the first cause, then intermediate causes, then an ultimate effect.

25
Q

Q: How does the fourth premise (P4) describe the dependency between causes?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: If A is the efficient cause of B, then if A doesn’t exist neither does B.

26
Q

Q: What conclusion (C1) does Aquinas draw from premises P1 to P4?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: There must be a first sustaining cause, otherwise P1 would be false as there would be no further sustaining causes or effects.

27
Q

Q: Why does Aquinas reject an infinite regress of causes in the second conclusion (C2)?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: As there is a first cause, there cannot be an infinite regress of causes.

28
Q

Q: What final conclusion (C3) does Aquinas reach in his second way?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: The first cause must itself be uncaused. That thing we call God.

29
Q

Q: How does Aquinas treat the relationship between cause and effect in his first two ways?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: The relationship between cause and effect is treated as ontologically real but not temporal, pointing to the logical implications of there being sustaining causes.

30
Q

Q: What is meant by “atemporal causation” in Aquinas’ second way?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: Atemporal causation refers to the idea that the relationship between cause and effect is not bound by time but is logically necessary for the existence of sustaining causes.

31
Q

Q: How does the term “first” in “first cause” or “first mover” differ in meaning from a temporal sequence?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: The term “first” in “first cause” or “first mover” indicates being ontologically first, meaning that all motion and causation are ontologically dependent on it, rather than it being first in time.

32
Q

Q: Why is the second way called a cosmological argument from ‘atemporal causation’?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: It is called a cosmological argument from ‘atemporal causation’ because it focuses on the logical necessity of a first cause that is not bound by time but is required for the existence of sustaining causes.

33
Q

Q: What is the significance of the first cause being uncaused in Aquinas’ second way?

Aquinas’ 2nd way (atemporal causation)

A

A: The first cause being uncaused signifies that it is a necessary being that does not rely on any prior cause, thus serving as the ultimate foundation for all causation and existence.