cosmological argument Flashcards
what type of reasoning is the cosmological argument and why?
a-posteriori because it uses empiricism (senses) to gain knowledge about the existence of God from examining the universes (cosmos)
what does infinite regression mean?
a sequence of causes that go on endlessly with no starting point
what did Aquinas think about infinite regression?
Aquinas rejected the idea of infinite regress and believed that there must be a first cause that created and caused the universe.
where did Aquinas write about the five ways
Summa theologica
how many ways in aquinas five ways relate to the cosmological argument
the first three ways
what are each of the first three ways called?
first way: motion
second way: uncaused causer
third way: contingency and necessity
(MUC)
what is the first way and what is it about?
the first way is motion and it is the belief that everything in the world is in a process of motion.
what is everything in the universe changing from?
potentiality (something can be able to change into something else) to actuality (when something becomes what potential it had to be)
what did Aquinas conclude in this 1st way?
he concluded that there must be an unmoved mover which is God. ( he moves things without moving himself )
what is aquinas second way and what is it about?
uncaused causer and it is the belief that every effect has a cause, but there must be a first cause, someone that caused all of this world to happen. This is God. (he cant be apart of the process of cause and effect)
what is aquinas third way and what is it about?
contingency and necessity and it is about how everything in the universe is contingent (relies upon something else for its existence)
what did aquinas conclude?
that there must be something that doesnt depend on anything else. A necessary being that created its own existence and doesnt rely on anybody.
for aquinas infinite regress is what?
impossible since God created the universe.
what is humes criticism on Aquinas second way?
1) rejection of there being an uncaused causer.
- just because things within the universe can be explained through causes does not mean there is a cause for the universe as a whole.
according to humes just because we observe cause and effect doesnt mean this applies to the universe, what is this called?
fallacy of composition. (if something is true of one thing doesnt mean it has to be true for the whole thing)