Correlation -> Linear Regression Flashcards

1
Q

CORRELATION

A
  • measures “degree of association” between 2 scale (interval/ratio)/ordinal (ordered category) variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

ASSOCIATIONS

A
  • measured in “r” (parametric/Pearson’s)/”p” (non-parametric/Spearman’s)
  • unless both variables = normally distributed, Spearman’s MUST be used
    POSITIVE
  • increase in 1 variable = associated w/increase in other
    NEGATIVE
  • increase in 1 variable = associated w/decrease in other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

CORRELATION (EXAMPLES)

A
  • comparing 2 variables in degree of association terms (ie. attitude scales VS behavioural frequency)
  • test statistic = r (parametric)/p (non-parametric) (aka. -1 = perfect negative correlation; 0 = random distribution zero correlation; +1 = perfect positive correlation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CORRELATION: HEIGHT VS WEIGHT

A
  • strong positive correlation between height/weight
  • can see how relationship works BUT cannot calculate one from other
  • causal inference (?); aka. is 1 variable dependent on other? are both influenced independently by third variable?
  • ie. if 120cm tall, how heavy (approx.)?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CORRELATION: SUMMARY

A
  • association tests use “correlation coefficient” to assess how strongly/in what direction 2 continuous variables are associated
  • CANNOT tell us anything about causal inferences aka. cause-effect direction of relation; logic only sometimes determines this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CORRELATION: ANOVA EXAMPLE

A
  • eg. one-way ANOVA w/contrasts
  • tells us (ie.) if treatment has effect on symptom index BUT not anything about relation between amount of A/B drug/symptoms experienced by patient
  • correlation = strong & negative; shows relation but not predictions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

LINE OF BEST FIT

A
  • allows to describe relationship between variables more accurately
  • can now predict specific values of 1 variable from knowledge of other
  • all points should be close to it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

RESIDUAL VALUE

A
  • can predict specific values of 1 variable from knowledge of another via simple regression/best fit line
  • BUT will predictions be as accurate? NO; via “residual value”
  • aka. dif between observed value of DV (y-axis) VS predicted by equation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

GENERAL REGRESSION RULES

A
  • DV should be measured on interval/ratio (continuous) scale variable
  • ordinal usually good in practice so long as we have large enough category number (7+) & frequency distribution = normal
  • IVs should be measured on interval/ratio scales
  • BUT… most ordinal measurement = acceptable in practice (apply same rules as ordinal DVs)
  • dichotomies/binary variables = also OK as IVs
  • distributions of variables should be roughly normal; correlation/regression = sensitive to shape of frequency distribution of variables (unlike ANOVA)
  • regression/associated techniques = robust BUT w/limits
  • if not roughly normal can be corrected via appropriate transformation (ie. taking logarithms of all measurements)
  • 2-valued categorical variables (dichotomies/binary variables) can be used directly as regressors (ie. yes/no)
  • categorical variables w/3+ categories are dealt w/via dummy variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ANOVA VS MULTIPLE REGRESSION

A

DVs
- ANOVA/regression = continuous only
IVs
- ANOVA = category only
- regression = both continuous/category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SUMMARY

A

1-WAY ANOVA
- continuous (DV) -> category (IV (1))
2-WAY ANOVA
- continuous (DV) -> category (IV (1)) + category (IV(2))
SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
- continuous (DV) -> continuous (IV (1))
MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
- continuous (DV) -> continuous (IV (1)) + continuous (IV (2)) + …

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly