CORRELATION AND INFERENCE Flashcards

1
Q

CORRELATION AND INFERENCE

A

Concept of Correlation

Pearson r

Spearman Rho

Graphic Representations of Correlation

Meta-Analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

a number that provides

us with an index of the strength of the relationship between two things.

A

coefficient of correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

an expression of the degree and direction of correspondence between
two things.

A

correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

expresses a linear relationship between two (and only
two) variables,

continuous in nature

reflects the degree of concomitant variation
between variable X and variable Y

numerical index that
expresses this relationship: It tells us the extent to which X and Y are “co-related.”

A

coefficient of correlation (r)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If asked to supply information about its magnitude, it would respond with a
number anywhere at all between

A

−1 and +1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If two variables simultaneously increase or simultaneously

decrease, then those two variables are

A

positively (or

directly) correlated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

occurs

when one variable increases while the other variable decreases

A

negative (or inverse) correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

absolutely no relationship exists

between the two variables.

A

correlation is zero

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

third variety of perfect correlation; that

is, a perfect noncorrelation.

A

“perfectly

no correlation”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

does not imply causation, but there is an implication of prediction.

A

correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

if we know that there is a high correlation between X and Y…

A

able to predict—with various degrees of accuracy, depending on other factors—the value of
one of these variables if we know the value of the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

known as the Pearson correlation coefficient and the Pearson product-moment
coefficient of correlation.

Karl Pearson

A

Pearson r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

statistical tool
of choice when the relationship between the variables is linear

when the two variables
being correlated are continuous

A

r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

calculate a Pearson r

A

r = Σ(X − X)(Y− Y)
√[Σ(X − X)2[Σ(Y − Y)2]

convert each raw score to a standard score and then multiply each pair of standard scores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

simplified Pearson r

A

r = Σxy

√(Σx2)(Σy2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Another formula for calculating a Pearson r

A

r = NΣXY -(ΣX)(ΣY)
√NΣX2 - (ΣX)2√NΣY2−(ΣY)2

N - number of paired scores

Σ XY -sum of the product
of the paired X and Y scores

Σ X - sum of the X scores

Σ Y - sum of the Y scores

Σ X2 - sum of the squared X scores

Σ Y2 - sum of the squared Y scores

17
Q

r2

indication of how much variance is shared by the X- and the Y-variables

A

coefficient of determination

18
Q

calculation

of r2

A

square the correlation coefficient and multiply by 100;

the result is equal to the percentage of the variance accounted for.

19
Q

moment describes a deviation about a mean of a

distribution

A

product-moment coefficient of correlation

20
Q

Individual deviations about the mean of a distribution

referred to as the first moments of the distribution

A

deviates

21
Q

second moments of the

distribution

A

moments squared

22
Q

third moments of the distribution

A

moments

cubed, and so forth

23
Q

called a rank-order correlation
coefficient, a rank-difference correlation coefficient

Charles Spearman

A

Spearman Rho

24
Q

used when the sample size is small (fewer than 30 pairs of measurements)

when both sets of measurements are in ordinal (or rank-order) form.

A

Spearman’s rho

25
Q

Graphic Representations of Correlation

A

bivariate distribution

scatter diagram

scattergram

scatterplot.

26
Q

a simple graphing of the coordinate points for values of the X-variable
(horizontal axis) and the Y-variable (
vertical axis)

provide a quick indication of the direction
and magnitude of the relationship, if any, between the two variables.

Figures 3–13 and 3–14

A

scatterplot

27
Q

distinguish positive from negative correlations, note the direction of the curve.

estimate the strength of magnitude of the correlation, note the degree to which the points
form a straight line.

A

scatterplot

28
Q

“eyeball gauge” of how curved
a graph is.

graph does not appear to take the form of a straight line, the chances
are good that the relationship is not linear

Figure 3–15

A

curvilinearity

29
Q

an extremely
atypical point located at a relatively long distance—an outlying distance—from the rest of the
coordinate points in a scatterplot

(Figure 3–16)

A

outlier

30
Q

a family of techniques used to statistically combine
information across studies to produce single estimates of the data under study.

facilitates
the drawing of conclusions and the making of statements like, “the typical therapy client is
better off than 75% of untreated individuals”

A

Meta-Analysi

31
Q

typically expressed as a correlation coefficient.

A

effect size

32
Q

advantages

to meta-analyses

A

can be replicated

conclusions of meta-analyses
tend to be more reliable and precise than the conclusions from single studies

more
focus on effect size rather than statistical significance alone

promotes
evidence-based practice

33
Q

professional practice that is based on clinical

and research findings

A

evidence-based practice