Corporations Flashcards
Ohio corporations are governed by
the GCL: general corporation law
under the GCL: corporations are:
limited liability legal entities which can:
- sue or be sued in their own names
- execute contract
- purchase property
- acquire or be acquired by other corporations or business entities
- enter into partnerships
- borrow money
- resist takeovers
- and make charitable contributions
corporations limited liabilities for shareholders
- shareholder are not liable absent unusual circumstances for the torts or contracts attributable to the corporation
- the shareholders of corporations are only liable for corporate tort/contracts if
a) torts: the shareholder commits the tort himself while acting on corporate business
b) contracts: the shareholder co-signs
c) K/tort: the court pierces the corporate veil
incorporators
- a person who creates a corporation by signing the articles of incorporation
- under the GCL, only one incorporator is required but there can be more than one
- this includes natural persons, citizens and noncitizens of ohio and legal persons
articles of incorporation
- a document that is filed with the state yo create a de jure corporation
- articles must contain:
name of the corporation: distinguishable from other ohio businesses and contains the words: corporation, incorporated, company or an abbreviation
place of principal office in ohio, can be owned by a firm elsewhere but has to have an office here
initial capital stock structure:
what does the initial capital stock structure include?
- the maximum number of shares of stock that can be sold without amending the articles
- the number of shares in each class if there are different classes
- the voting rights and distribution preferences of each class and any par value if shares with par value are sold
article of incorporation may include:
- a statement of purpose (if there is no statement the corporation may engage in any lawful activity)
- paid in capital requirements
statement of purpose
- generally, if no statement of purpose the GCL allows a business to engage in any lawful activity
- if the corporation contains a more limited statement of purpose, then it can generally only act within the confines of that purpose
ultra vires:
if the corporation’s articles contain a statement of purpose any actions outside the scope of that statement are ultra vires and directors and officers responsible for the UV act are personally responsible for the corporate losses
paid in capital requirements
- may provide that a certain amount of capital must be paid into the corporation before any business can commence
- if business commences before the capital requirement is met, the incorporators/directors are personally liable
filing articles
- delivered to the secretary of state along with a filing fee
- unless otherwise specified the corporation’s existence begins upon filing
- filing has to be accompanied by a statement identifying an agent for service who must be a resident of ohio, an ohio corporation, or a corporation who has qualified as a foreign corporation to do business in ohio
after filing of the articles:
- the incorporators organize a shareholder’s meeting where:
- initial directors are elected
- regulations or by-laws may be adopted
adoptions of regulations v. articles
- most corporations set forth rules to govern the corporation
- can be amended by a majority vote and sometimes without a meeting
- easier to amend than the articles which require a meeting and a 2/3 vote
- in a conflict between the articles and the regulations, the articles win
de facto corporation
- **the defendant has to be unaware that they failed to achieve corporate status
1. unsuccessful but
2. good faith attempt to comply with the incorporation statute and
3. colorable compliance with the statute and
4. some exercise of corporate privilege
effect of a de facto corporation
treat the business which is really a partnership, a joint venture or a sole proprietorship as if it were a de jure corporation for all purposes except an action by the state
2. apply to tort or contract claims
corporation by estoppel
- where a third party treats a business as a corporation that third party may be estopped from denying that the business’s corporate form
- the defendant cannot be aware that there was a defect leading to a lack of corporate status
- this is valid in ohio except in an action by the state
- apply to contract claims only
promotors
- people who act on behalf of a corporation that has not yet been formed (because the articles are not filed)
- incorporators are promoters, they act to create the corporation but not all promotors are incorporators
contracts entered into by promotors
1, promotors sign in their own name or the name of a partnership or JV
- the corporation is not liable until it adopts the contract
- promoters who sign on behalf of a business prior to incorporation remain liable on the contract until there is novation
adoption of a contract by a corporation
- can be express like a formal board resolution
2. can be implied if the corporation recieves benefits of the K
novation
an agreement modifying the contract between the contracting party, the corporation, and the promotor in which the corporation replaces the promotor as the party to the contract
adoption v. novation
- adoption makes the corporation liable but only a novation relieves the promotor of liability
foreign corporation
- formed under the laws of another state
- can transact business in ohio
- can form a contract in ohio, be sued in ohio as long as there is a license from the secretary of state which inclues a designated agent in ohio for the service of process
if a foreign corporation fails to obtain a license in ohio:
it can still be sued in ohio courts but subject to a fine
internal affairs doctrine
- disputes concerning the governance of a foreign corporation are resolved under the law of the state in which it is incorporated
- ohio will not deny a license because of differences in ohio law and law of incorporation state
professional associations
- only professionals of the particular profession can be shareholder
- eligible professions are: attorneys, CPAs, professional engineers and architects and physicians, dentists orthodontists
limited liability and veil piercing in corporations
- once validly formed, the shareholder, officers and directors are not personally liable for the obligations of the firm
- however, an extraordinary remedy exists in piercing the corporate veil
piercing the corporate veil
- the corporation is an alter ego of a shareholder, the court may choose to pierce the corporate veil and hold the shareholder liable for the torts and contracts of the corporation
apply piercing the corporate veil where
- corporation lacks a separate will, mind or existence of its own
- the corporation is used to commit fraud or illegal acts AND
- injustice would result from following the general rule
Caveat: - just because a corporation only has 1 shareholder, director and officer does not mean the veil will be pierced
- failure to respect corporate formalities such as the requirements to hold meetings, keep separate accounts or conduct elections does not mean the veil is pierced
- inadequate capitalization without more does not justify the pierce, though it is often considered (a corporation should have adequate capital to carry out ordinary business)
- individuals who commit fraud and other torts while acting on corporate business are personally liable w/o veil piercing
- when a veil is pierced only those actively involved in the wrongful conduct are affected
veil piercing standards applied
- can impose liability on indiviual shareholders, and under the same standards of a parent corporation for the obligation of their subsidiaries
- more likely to be applied in tort cases where the victim is less likely to be aware of the corporations legal limited liability status
stock or shares
- the basic units of ownership or equity in a corporation
- shareholders are generally entitled to vote on appropriate matters (election of BOD & fundamental corporate changes), to share in dividends when declared and split the remaining assets in the event of dissolution
debt as a form of security in corporation
- ex. corporate bond
- debt affords no ownership status
- a corporate bond holder is a creditor of the corporation entitled to be paid a certain amount at a certain time
- bondholders are generally not entitled to bring claims regarding fiduciary breaches by directors and officers, but shareholders can
issuing stock
- only the BOD can issue stock
2. stock issued to investors is issued and outstanding
treasury stock
- owned by the corporation
2. not outstanding becuase not owned by investors
subscriptions (corporations)
- a written promise by an incorporator or another to buy stock in a corporation
- once accepted by a subscriber, a subscription cannot be unilaterally revoked by the subscriber
- a subscription becomes binding on the corporation when it is accepted by the board of directors which can under the GCL also release, settle, or compromise a subscription
consideration (corporation)
shares may be issued in exchange for any benefit of value to the corporation including
- cash/ check
- property (including tangible, and intangible property)
- services already performed
- promissory notes or services to be performed in the future (shares are not considered paid for until the note is satisfied or the service is provided)
unpaid stock
- if a subscriber or a shareholder breaches a promise to pay for corporate shares
- the subscriber or shareholder is liable to the corporation (and for bankrupt firms to the receiver or trustee) under contract law and the corporation may auction the shares
par value
- the minimum price issue for a share
- under GCL, Par is not required
- a corporation may sell no par stock, but if there is par, the shares cannot be issued for less than par
- par is a floor not a ceiling
- if no par, just have to sell at any positive value
- the bod determines the value of property in exchange for shares, the boads valuation is conclusive unless it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the board knowingly assigned a false value
watered stock
- the sale of stick for consideration less than par value
liability for the water stock
- the holder of the watered stock is liable to the corporation even if the holder is a transferee who received the stock from the original purchaser
- exception: the transferee is not liable if she holds the stock in a fiduciary capacity or holds a security interest in the stock
- the board is liable for fiduciary duty breaches
pre-emptive rights
- shareholder may wish to preserve their relative ownership stake in a corporation by obtaining preemptive rights
- preemptive rights allow the shareholder to claim portions of new share to preserve their relative holdings
- gives the option to buy shares but does not require the purchase
- if a corporation is formed prior to march 17, 2000 preemptive rights were automatic under common stock, not they are only present when specifically mentioned
preemptive rights and treasury shares
there is no preemptive rights for the treasury shares and shares sold for other than cash
Directors
sit on the BOD with full managerial authority over the corporation
officers
are senior managers who may or may not also be directors
the board of directors
manages the business and recommends fundamental corporate changes to shareholders (mergers, acquisitions)
- the board may delegate substantial management functions to committees of more or more directors
- however a board cannot create a committee to assume all the functions of the BOD
statutory requirements for the BOD
- at least 3 directors unless there is only 1 shareholder (req. 1 director) or 2 shareholders (2 directors)
- natural, adult persons: a director cannot be a corporation
- the articles of incorporation may specify additional requirements for the directors
election of directors
- shareholders elect at an annual meeting
- directors terms may vary but cannot exceed three years, directors with different terms are elected at different times which makes a corporate takeover more difficult
removal of bod
- shareholders may vote by a majority to remove any or all directors whether or not there is cause for removal
- however, if cumulative voting is used for director elections, directors may not be removed if the vote against removal is enough to elect a director
- Also id the board if classified and has staggered elections then shareholders can only remove a director for cause
- the bod may remove a director is the director does not accept the office after being elected or if the director has become bankrupt or adjudicated as of unsound mind
vacancy on bod
- vacant seats (by death, retirements etc) can be filled by the majority of remaining directors even if there are not enough directors to constitute a forum OR
- shareholders except for directors removed by shareholders must be replaced by shareholder vote
bod can make decisions by:
- unanimous written consent including email
- meetings including teleconference or videoconference so long as all persons can hear each other
- board meetings do not have to be in ohio
notice for bod meeting
- notice of board meetings must be provided to all directors at least 2 days before the meeting (time and place)
- failure to give notice can be waived if a director shows up to the meeting and does not object or in writing
- the notice need not state the purpose of the meeting and may be delivered in person, by telegram or any other means of communication including email authorized by the director
voting bod: quorum
- the minimum number of directors that must vote on a proposal for that vote to be effective unless otherwise in the articles is a majority of the duly constituted board (the board with no vacancies)
- if a director leaves a meeting she is not counted for the sake of the quorum
- if enough directors leave the meeting quorum is broken
voting bod: majority
unless otherwise provided, if a majority of directors voting on an issue vote yes then the proposal is adopted
bod proxy voting or voting agreements
not allowed for bod
Proxy voting
- giving someone else the right to your vote
2. allowed for shareholder voting
voting agreement
- voters agree how they will vote, not permitted for bod because would compromise the discretion of the board
fiduciary duty: bod: duty of care
directors must act in
- good faith
- in the best interest of the corporation (think about shareholders and other constituencies, long and short term effect)
- with the care an ordinarily prudent person would employ in a like position and under similar circumstances
Business judgement rule
- a director is presumed to act in the best interest of the corporation unless the plaintiff proves by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.
- courts will not second guess a board decision made in good faith based in available information and after reasonable investigation and which had a rational basis
- BJR 2 step: state the duty of care, state the bjr