corporations Flashcards
what is a promoter?
person who procures commitments for capital and instrumentalities on behalf of a corp that will be formed in the future
Promoter’s Liability
generally, promoters are personally liable on Ks which they enter into on behalf of a to-be-formed corp
Promoters who act on behalf of a corporation knowing that there was no incorporation are liable for liabilities created by so acting.
so need (1) action on behalf of unformed corp, AND (2) knowledge that the corp had not formed
Even if the corp has adopted the K, the promoter’s liability ends only when there is a:
1. Novation; or
2. Release
any exceptions to promoter liability?
a promoter will not be liable on a K for an unformed corp if the agreement b/w the parties expressly indicates that the promoter is not to be bound
how can a corp become liable for a promoter’s K?
generally, the corp is not liable on a pre-incorporation K entered into by a promoter, UNLESS:
- the board of directors expressly ADOPTS the agreement; or
- there is a knowing acceptance or retention of the contract’s BENEFITS
Fiduciary Duty of Care:
Business Judgment Rule
The BJR is a presumption that a Director’s decision may not be challenged if the director:
(1) acted in GOOD FAITH
(2) with the care that a REASONABLE PERSON would exercise in a like position, and
(3) in a manner the Director reasonably believed to be in the BEST INTEREST of the corporation
If the Director does the above, then a court will not second guess the Director’s decisions
A person challenging director action has the burden of proving that the above standard was not met
Business Judgment Rule
How informed must Directors be?
Directors must be informed to an extent that they reasonably believe is appropriate
Directors are entitled to rely on reports from (1) corp officers whom the Director reasonably believes to be reliable/competent, and
(2) corp outsiders as to matters that the Director reasonably believes to be within the outsider’s professional competence
Fiduciary Duties: Duty of Loyalty
directors have a duty of loyalty to the corporation. Most common issues here involve a conflict of interest
Directors owe the corp a duty of loyalty, which generally prevents the directors from profiting the expense of the corporation
the Business Judgment Rule does NOT apply in duty of loyalty cases. The burden is on the defendant here
A director violates the duty of loyalty if the director:
1. is on both sides of the transaction
2. competes with the corporation
3. usurps a business opportunity
Duty of Loyalty:
What constitutes a Conflicting Transaction? (“Self-Dealing”)
a conflicting transaction is any transaction b/w the corporation and:
(1) one of its directors, or
(2) that director’s close relative, or
(3) another business of the director’s
Duty of Loyalty:
Upholding a Conflicting Interest transaction
a conflicting interest transaction will not be set aside IF:
1. the director discloses all material facts to the board and a majority of the disinterested directors approve the transaction, or
2. the director discloses all material facts to the disinterested shareholders who then approve the transaction, or
3. the transaction is fair to the corporation
Shareholder Lawsuits:
Direct Suits
a direct suit is appropriate when the wrong done amounts to a breach of duty owed to the shareholder PERSONALLY
in a direct suit, the shareholder is bringing suit on their own behalf. NOT on behalf of the corp
direct suits tend to arise when:
- shareholder is denied preemptive rights
- shareholder is denied payment of dividend
- shareholder is oppressed in a close corp
Shareholder Lawsuits:
Derivative Suits
a derivative suit is appropriate when the injury is caused to the corporation and the shareholder is trying to enforce the corporation’s rights
Requirements for filing a derivative suit (SAD):
1. STANDING (i.e. shareholder must have been a shareholder at the time the claim arose or became a shareholder through transfer by operation of law from someone who did own stock at time claim arose)
2. ADEQUACY (shareholder fairly and adequately represents the interests of the corp); and
3. DEMAND* (shareholder must make a written demand on the corp to take action)
generally the shareholder should file a written demand on the corp board to take action and wait 90 days before filing a suit, UNLESS
1. irreparable injury would result, or
2. demand would be futile, or
3. corp board rejected demand
Piercing the Corporate Veil
generally, shareholders can NOT be held liable for the corp’s debts and obligations. BUT a shareholder might be personally liable for what the corp did if the court “pierces the corporate veil”
to pierce the corp veil and hold shareholders personally liable:
1. the shareholders must have abused the privilege of incorporating; AND
2. fairness must require holding them liable
the court will typically pierce the corporate veil when:
i. shareholders ignore formalities, making the corp a mere “alter ego” (e.g. commingling of assets)
ii. undercapitalization at time of formation (not enough to cover prospective liabilities)
iii. or the corp was formed to commit a fraud
Appraisal
Shareholders who dissent from a fundamental corporate change can force the corp to purchase their shares at a fair price (must be a closely held corp)
To use the appraisal remedy, the shareholders must:
1. file an objection to the change/transaction before or at the shareholder’s meeting at which the vote is taken,
2. not vote in favor of the plan, and
3. send the corp a written demand for the fair value of their shares and give estimate of the fair value
If the corp does not want to pay what the shareholders demanded, the corp must file suit to have the court determine fair value
Approving a Fundamental Corporate Change
a fundamental corporate change can be implemented ONLY if:
1. the directors first pass a resolution to implement the plan, and
2. the plan is then approved by the shareholders
i.e. a corp board lacks authority to authorize fundamental corp changes unless it has shareholder approval
Officers
officers are agents of the corporation. An officer’s authority is therefore governed by agency law. So apply AGENCY analysis
a corp president, CEO, etc. is an agent of the corporation and has whatever power the corp grants him (actual authority)
Unless specifically excluded by the corporation, a president will have the authority to enter into ordinary Ks involving the day to day operation of the corporation
But the president only has authority to enter into extraordinary Ks if authorized by the Board. The board can NOT give the officer power that the board itself does not have
a president does NOT have authority to issue dividends. Only board does
When is a board’s meeting and vote proper?
unless the articles of incorporation state otherwise, a board meeting can take place if there is a quorum consisting of a majority of the directors
Resolutions can be passed at the meeting by the vote of the majority of the quorum