Corporations Flashcards
Promotor Liability
A promotor is held personally liable for knowingly acting on behalf of a corporation before incorporation, and remains liable after corporation becomes incorporated unless there is a novation, the third party look to the corporation for performance, or the promotor had no actual knowledge that the corporation’s charter has not yet been issued.
Adoption
Corporation is generally not liable for pre-incorporation transactions, even if those transactions ultimately benefit the corporation, BUT corporation may be liable if it expressly or impliedly adopts a contract by accepting the benefits of the transaction or gives an express acceptance of liability for a debt.
Ultra Vires Actions
An ultra vires act is when a corporation’s articles of incorporation include a narrow purpose in the articles and the corporation subsequently engages in activities outside that stated purpose.
A third party generally cannot escape liability for a transaction that is an ultra vires corporate act.
An ultra vires act can be enjoined by a SH or the corporation can take action against a director, officer, or employee who engaged in the action.
The state can initiate an ultra vires proceeding as well.
De Jure Corporation
A de jure corporation is a corporation that meets all the statutory requirements for incorporation. The corporation can only be held liable for corporate liabilities at that point.
De Facto Corporation
A de facto corporation is a defective corporation whose owner makes a good faith effort to comply with the incorporation requirements and operate C without knowing the requirements were not met.
Corporation by Estoppel
A person dealing with an entity in a contractual agreement as if it were a corporation is estopped from denying its existence and seeking personal liability.
Hierarchy of Stock Distribution
- Secured Creditors
- Preferred Stock Holders
- Common Stock Holders
Rule 10b-5 Action
Rule 10b-5 action must meet the following requirements:
- The P purchased or sold the security
- Use of interstate commerce
- The D’s fraudulent/deceptive conduct (untrue statement of material fact/failure to prevent misleading statements/insider trading)
- Materiality - a reasonable investor would find the fact important in deciding whether to purchase or sell a security
- Scienter - D must make statement intentionally or recklessly
- P justifiably relied on the D’s fraudulent conduct
- Harm to P
Rule 16(b) Action (PCSS)
- Publicly traded corporations - must have securities traded on national securities exchange or have assets of more than ten million and more than 500 SHs
- Corporate insiders- Ds, Os, or SHs with more than 10% of stock
- Short swing profits - a corporate insider both bought and sold corporation’s stock during any six month period.
- SEC report of change in stock ownership
Shareholder Meetings
Can be brought by board or SHs holding 10% or more of voting shares.
Notice requires voting SHs be notified of date/time/place no less than 10 days and no more than 60 days before meeting. Can be waived by writing or attendance.
Shareholder Meeting Quorum
A majority of the votes entitled to be cast on a matter
Board of Director’s Special Meeting
For the board of directors’ acts at a meeting to be valid, a quorum of directors must be present at the meeting. A majority of all directors in office constitutes a quorum, unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws require a higher or lower number. A director must be present at the time that the vote is taken in order to be counted for quorum purposes, but presence includes appearances made through communications equipment that allows all persons participating in the meeting to hear and speak to one another.
Duty of Care
Director has a duty to act with the care that a person in a like position would reasonably believe appropriate under similar circumstances and is required to use any additional knowledge and special skills he possess when deciding how to act.
Can rely on opinions and info obtain from officers, employees, outside experts, committees, if D reasonably believes them to be reliable and competent.
Business Judgment Rule
BJR is a rebuttable presumption that D reasonably believed his actions were in the best interest of the corporation. This presumption is overcome in the case of fraud, dereliction of duty, illegal conduct, or conflict of interest.
Overcoming BJR
Must be shown that D was not acting in good faith, not informed to the extent he reasonably believed was necessary, had material interests in the challenged conduct and was not objective, failed to devote attention to corporation’s affairs, failed to timely investigate matters of material concern, or D received financial benefits to which he was not entitled.