Corporate Finance Flashcards
Capital budgeting process
The capital budgeting process is the process of identifying and evaluating capital projects; that is, projects where the cash flow to the firm will be received over a period longer than a year.
Categories of capital budgeting projects
- Replacement projects to maintain the business are normally made without detailed analysis.
- Replacement projects for cost reduction determine whether equipment that is obsolete, but still usable, should be replaced. A fairly detailed analysis is necessary in this case.
- Expansion projects are taken on to expand the business and involve a complex decision-making process since they require an explicit forecast of future demand. A very detailed analysis is required.
- New product or market development also entails a complex decision-making process that will require a detailed analysis due to the large amount of uncertainty involved.
- Mandatory projects may be required by a governmental agency or insurance company and typically involve safety-related or environmental concerns.
- Other projects. Some projects are not easily analyzed through the capital budgeting process.
Principles of Capital Budgeting
- Decisions are based on cash flows, not accounting income
- Incremental cash flows: Changes in cash flows that will occur if the project is undertaken
- Sunk costs: costs that cannot be avoided even if the project is not undertaken. Should not be included in the analysis.
- Externalities: effects the acceptance of a project may have on other firm cash flows (cannibalization).
- Cash flows are based on opportunity costs
- The timing of cash flows is important
- Cashflows are analyzed on an after-tax basis
- Financing costs are reflected in the project’s required rate of return
Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS)
- In the United States, most companies use straight-line depreciation for financial reporting and the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) for tax purposes.
- For capital budgeting purposes, we should use the same depreciation method used for tax reporting since capital budgeting analysis is based on after-tax cash flows and not accounting income.
How inflation affects capital budgeting analysis
- Analyzing nominal or real cash flows.
- Changes in inflation affect project profitability.
- Inflation reduces the tax savings from depreciation.
- Inflation decreases the value of payments to bondholders.
- Inflation may affect revenues and costs differently.
Real Options
Real options allow managers to make future decisions that change the value of capital budgeting decisions made today. They give the option holder the right, but not the obligation, to make a decision. Real options are based on real assets and are contingent on future events. Real options offer managers flexibility that can improve the NPV estimates for individual projects.
Type of real options
- Timing options allow a company to delay making an investment
- Abandonment options allow management to abandon a project if the PV of the incremental CFs from exiting a project exceeds the PV value of the incremental CFs from continuing a project.
- Expansion options allow a company to make additional investments in a project if doing so creates value.
-
Flexibility options give managers choices regarding the operational aspects of a project
- Price-setting options allow the company to change the price of a product.
- Production-flexibility options may include paying workers overtime, using different materials as inputs, or producing a different variety of product
- Fundamental options are projects that are options themselves because the payoffs depend on the price of an underlying asset
Economic income
economic income = cash flow + (ending market value − beginning market value)
Accounting income
Accounting income will differ from economic income because:
- Accounting depreciation is based on the original cost (not market value) of the investment.
- Financing costs (e.g., interest expense) are considered as a separate line item and subtracted out to arrive at net income. In the basic capital budgeting model, financing costs are reflected in the WACC.
Economic profit
EP = NOPAT - $WACC
= EBIT (1 - tax rate) - WACC X capital
Market value added
The NPV based on economic profit is called the market value added (MVA) and is calculated as:
NPV =MVA =∑∞t=1 [EPt / (1+WACC)t]
The valuation using economic profit is the same as the valuation using the basic NPV approach. No matter which method is used for determining income, if it is applied correctly, the resulting NPV should be the same.
Residual income
residual income = net income − equity charge
Value of Equity
The value of equity is the PV of cash distributions to equity
Weighted Average Cost of Capital
WACC = (Market weight of debt × After-tax cost of debt) + (Market weight of equity × Cost of equity)
MM’s study is based on the following simplifying assumptions
- Capital markets are perfectly competitive: there are no transactions costs, taxes, or bankruptcy costs.
- Investors have homogeneous expectations
- Riskless borrowing and lending: investors can borrow/lend at the risk-free rate.
- No agency costs: no conflict of interest between managers and shareholders.
- Investment decisions are unaffected by financing decisions: operating income is independent of how assets are financed.
MM Proposition (No Tax)
- MM Proposition I (No Taxes): capital structure is irrelevant, assuming no taxes, transaction costs, or bankruptcy costs
- VL = VU
- MM Proposition II (No Taxes): the cost of equity increases linearly as a company increases its proportion of debt financing. Therefore, the benefits of using a larger proportion of debt as a cheaper source of financing are offset by the rise in the cost of equity, resulting in no change in the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
- re = r0 + (D/E) (r0 – rd)
MM Proposition (with Taxes)
- MM Proposition I (with Taxes): value is maximized at 100% debt
- VL = VU + (d x t)
- MM Proposition II (with Taxes): WACC is minimized at 100% debt
- rE = r0 + (D/E) (r0 – rD) (1 – TC)
Two component of financial distress
-
Costs of financial distress and bankruptcy can be direct or indirect.
- Direct costs of financial distress include the cash expenses associated with the bankruptcy, such as legal fees and administrative fees.
- Indirect costs include foregone investment opportunities and the costs that result from losing the trust of customers, creditors, suppliers, and employees.
- Probability of financial distress is related to the firm’s use of operating and financial leverage. In general, higher amounts of leverage result in a higher probability of financial distress.
Agency costs of equity
Agency costs of equity refer to the costs associated with the conflicts of interest between managers and owners. Net agency costs of equity have three components:
- Monitoring costs are the costs associated with supervising management and include the expenses associated with making reports to shareholders and paying the board of directors. Note that strong corporate governance systems will reduce monitoring costs.
- Bonding costs are assumed by management to assure shareholders that the managers are working in the shareholders’ best interest. Examples of bonding costs include the premiums for insurance to guarantee performance and implicit costs associated with non-compete agreements.
- Residual losses may occur even with adequate monitoring and bonding provisions because such provisions do not provide a perfect guarantee.
Cost of asymmetric information
- The cost of asymmetric information increases as the proportion of equity in the capital structure increases
- Management’s choice of debt or equity financing may provide a signal regarding management’s opinion of the firm’s future prospects.
- Taking on the commitment to make fixed interest payments through debt financing sends a signal that management has confidence in the firm’s ability to make these payments in the future.
- Issuing equity is typically viewed as a negative signal that managers believe a firm’s stock is overvalued.
Pecking order theory
- Internally generated equity (retained earnings)
- Debt
- External equity (newly issued shares)
Optimal capital structure
Where the additional value added from the debt tax shield is exceeded by the value-reducing costs of financial distress from the additional borrowing, this point represents the optimal capital structure for a firm where the WACC is minimized and the value of the firm is maximized.
Target Capital structure
The structure that the firm uses over time when making decisions about how to raise additional capital.
Factors explain the majority of the differences in capital structure across countries:
- Institutional and legal factors
- Strength of legal system
- Information asymmetry
- Taxe
- Financial markets and banking system factors
- Liquidity of capital markets
- Reliance on banking system
- Institutional investor presence
- Macroeconomic factors
- Inflation
- GDP growth
Types of dividends
- Regular cash dividends: Stable or increasing dividends paid regularly are perceived as a sign of profitability
- Dividend reinvestment plans
- Open market DRP
- New issue DRP (Scrip dividend scheme in UK)
- Dividend reinvestment plans
- Extra or special (irregular) dividends: Special dividends are paid under unusual circumstances under the expectation that the dividend is not recurring.
- Liquidating dividend: This is paid by a company when the whole firm or part of the firm is sold, or when dividends in excess of cumulative retained earnings are paid. A liquidating dividend is considered to be a return of capital as opposed to a return on capital.
- Stock dividend: Because the market value of the company is unchanged, the market price per share declines, leaving the shareholders with no net gain.
- Stock splits: These are similar to stock dividends (non-cash) but generally larger in size.
Cash dividends vs. stock dividends
- Cash dividend payments reduce cash as well as stockholders’ equity, resulting in a lower quick ratio and current ratio, and higher leverage (e.g., debt-to-equity and debt-to-asset) ratios.
- Stock dividends (and stock splits) leave a company’s capital structure unchanged and do not affect any of these ratios. In the case of a stock dividend, a decrease in retained earnings (corresponding to the value of the stock dividend) is offset by an increase in contributed capital, leaving the value of total equity unchanged.
Three theories of investor preference:
- MM’s dividend irrelevance theory holds that in a no-tax/no-fees world, dividend policy is irrelevant since it has no effect on the price of a firm’s stock or its cost of capital, because individual investors can create their own homemade dividend.
- Dividend preference theory says investors prefer the certainty of current cash to future capital gains.
- Tax aversion theory states that investors are tax averse to dividends and would prefer companies instead buy back shares, especially when the tax rate on dividends is higher than the tax rate on capital gains.