Corporate Finance Flashcards
Explain the Modigliani–Miller propositions (No Taxes) regarding capital structure.
MM Proposition I (No Taxes): says capital structure is irrelevant. Under the assumptions of no taxes, transaction costs, or bankruptcy costs, the value of the firm is unaffected by leverage changes.
MM Proposition II (No Taxes): concerning the cost of equity and leverage says that increasing the use of cheaper debt financing serves to increase the cost of equity, resulting in a zero net change in the company’s WACC. Again, the implication is that capital structure is irrelevant.
Explain the effects on costs of capital under MM Proposition (With Taxes) regarding effect of taxes and debt.
According to MM Proposition I (With Taxes): the tax deductibility of interest payments creates a tax shield that adds value to the firm, and the optimal capital structure is achieved with 100% debt.
MM Proposition II (With Taxes): says that WACC is minimized at 100% debt.
Explain factors an analyst should consider in evaluating the effect of capital structure policy on valuation.
Costs of financial distress are the increased costs companies face when earnings decline and the company has trouble paying its fixed costs.
Higher amounts of leverage result in greater expected costs of financial distress.
What is the net agency costs of equity?
The net agency costs of equity are the costs associated with the conflict of interest between a company’s managers and owners and consist of three components:
- Monitoring costs.
- Bonding costs.
- Residual losses.
What is the cost of asymmetric information and how does it effect Pecking order theory?
Costs of asymmetric information: result from managers having more information about a firm than investors. The cost of asymmetric information increases as more equity is used in capital structure. Hence the pecking order theory.
Pecking order theory: states that managers prefer financing choices that send the least visible signal to investors, with
- internal capital being most preferred
- debt being next
- raising equity externally the least preferred method of financing.
What is the static trade-off theory?
The static trade-off theory: seeks to balance the costs of financial distress with the tax shield benefits from using debt and states that there is an optimal capital structure that has an optimal proportion of debt.
Removing both MM’s assumptions of no taxes and no costs of financial distress, there comes a point where the incremental value added by the tax shield is exceeded by the additional expected costs of financial distress, and this point represents the optimal capital structure.
Managers typically have goals to maintain a certain minimum credit rating when determining their capital structure policies because the cost of capital is tied to debt ratings; lower ratings translate into higher costs of capital.
What are some factors an analyst should consider when evaluating a firm’s capital structure?
Factors an analyst should consider when evaluating a firm’s capital structure include:
- Changes in the firm’s capital structure over time.
- Capital structure of competitors with similar business risk.
- Factors affecting agency costs such as the quality of corporate governance.
What are the major factors that influence international differences in financial leverage?
Major factors that influence international differences in financial leverage include:
- Institutional, legal, and taxation factors.
- Financial market and banking system factors.
- Macroeconomic factors.
Describe the expected effect of regular cash dividends, stock dividends, and stock splits on shareholders’ wealth and a company’s financial ratios.
Cash dividend payments: reduce cash as well as stockholders’ equity. This results in a lower quick ratio and current ratio, and higher leverage ratios.
Stock dividends (and stock splits): leave a company’s capital structure unchanged and do not affect any of these ratios.
In the case of a stock dividend, a decrease in retained earnings is offset by an increase in contributed capital, leaving the value of total equity unchanged.
Compare the 3 theories investor preference of dividend policy.
MM’s dividend irrelevance theory: holds that in a no-tax/no-fees world, dividend policy is irrelevant since it has no effect on the price of a firm’s stock or its cost of capital, because individual investors can create their own homemade dividend.
Dividend preference theory: says investors prefer the certainty of current cash to future capital gains.
Tax aversion theory: states that investors are tax averse to dividends and would prefer companies instead buy back shares, especially when the tax rate on dividends is higher than the tax rate on capital gains.
Describe the signal of information that dividend initiations, increases, and decreases may convey.
The signaling effect of dividend changes is based on the idea that dividends convey information about future earnings from management to investors.
In general, unexpected increases are good news and unexpected decreases are bad news as seen by U.S. investors.
What are the two types agency costs and how may they affect a company’s dividend payout policy?
Agency conflict between shareholders and managers: can be reduced by paying out a higher proportion of the firm’s free cash flow to equity so as to discourage investment in negative NPV projects.
Agency conflict between shareholders and bondholders: occurs when shareholders can expropriate bondholder wealth by paying themselves a large dividend. Agency conflict between bondholders and stockholders is typically resolved via provisions in bond indenture.
What are the 6 primary factors affect a company’s dividend payout policy?
Investment opportunities: affects the residual income available to pay as dividends.
Expected volatility of future earnings: firms are more cautious in changing dividend payout in the presence of high earnings volatility.
Financial flexibility: Firms may not increase dividends so as not to be forced to continue paying those dividends in the future.
Tax considerations: In the presence of differential tax rate on capital gains versus dividends, companies may structure their dividend policy to maximize investors’ after-tax income.
Flotation costs: increases the cost of external equity as compared to retained earnings and would motivate firms to have a lower dividend payout.
Contractual and legal restrictions: Dividend policy may be affected by debt covenants that the firm has to adhere to. Legal restrictions in some jurisdictions limit the dividend payout of a firm.
Calculate and interpret the effective tax rate under double taxation, dividend imputation, and split-rate tax systems.
Effective rate under double taxation = corporate tax rate + (1 − corporate tax rate) × (individual tax rate)
A split-rate system: has different corporate tax rates on retained earnings and earnings that are paid out in dividends.The effective tax rate is computed the same way as double taxation but we use the corporate tax rate for distributed income as the relevant corporate tax rate in the double taxation formula.
Tax imputation system: taxes are paid at the corporate level but are used as credits by the stockholders. Hence, all taxes are effectively paid at the shareholder’s marginal tax rate.
Compare stable dividend with a constant dividend payout ratio.
Stable dividend policy: A company tries to align its dividend growth rate with the company’s long-term earnings growth rate to provide a steady dividend. A firm with a stable dividend policy could use a target payout adjustment model to gradually move towards its target payout.
Constant payout ratio: Company defines a proportion of earnings that it plans to pay out to shareholders regardless of volatility in earnings.
Compare share repurchase methods.
Open market transactions: The firm buys back its shares in the open market.
Fixed price tender offer: The firm buys a predetermined number of shares at a fixed price, at a premium over the current market price.
Dutch auction: A tender offer where the company specifies a range of prices rather than a fixed price. Bids are accepted (lowest price first) until the desired quantity is filled.
Repurchase by direct negotiation: Purchasing shares from a major shareholder, often at a premium over market price.
Compare the effect of a share repurchase on earnings per share when:
- The repurchase is financed with the company’s surplus cash
- The company uses debt to finance the repurchase.
Repurchases made using a company’s surplus cash: Will lower cash and shareholders’ equity and, therefore, increase the firm’s leverage. Earnings per share may increase because there will be fewer shares outstanding.
The company uses debt to finance the repurchase: EPS will increase if the after-tax funding cost is less than the earnings yield. However, the firm will then also have higher leverage and, therefore, a higher cost of capital, so an increase in EPS will not automatically lead to an increase in share price or in shareholder wealth.
Calculate the effect of a share repurchase on book value per share.
After a stock repurchase, the number of outstanding shares will decrease and the book value per share (BVPS) is likely to change as well. If the price paid is higher (lower) than the pre-repurchase BVPS, the BVPS will decrease (increase).
What are 5 common rationales for share repurchases versus dividends?
Potential tax advantages: When capital gains are taxed favorably as compared to dividends.
Share price support/signaling: Management wants to signal better prospects for the firm.
Added flexibility: Reduces the need for “sticky” dividends in the future.
Offsets dilution: from employee stock options.
Increases financial leverage: by reducing equity in the balance sheet.