core study summary psychology Flashcards
bandura background
social learning theory (children learn through imitation/modeling)
method and design for bandura
Lab experiment
independent measures design- 3 independent variables = sex of child, sex of model, aggressive or nonaggressive behaviour shown by model
participants in bandora
72 children 3-5 yrs old
50% each gender
3 groups - aggressive, non and control group with no model
materials in Bandura
bobo doll
model
attractive toys
procedure for bandura
1) modelling behaviour - all children individually brought into a room to play with toys for 10 mins. there was either a aggressive model kicking the bobo doll whist shouting pow and boom. In the non aggressive model they use assembled toys not looking at Bobo doll and in control group there was no model.
2) Agression arousal
children taken into a separate room with attractive toys. After 2 mins they were taken of them to increase the chances of aggressive behaviour.
3) testing for delayed imitation- the child was observed through a 2 way mirror for 2 mins on their behaviour.
results in Banduras study
1-children who witnessed an aggressive model were significantly more aggressive themselves.
2- very little difference between #aggression in the control group and in the non-aggressive model condition.
3- boys were significantly more physically aggressive than girls. Girls were more verbally aggressive than boys after observing a female model.
conclusions in Banduras study
1- witnessing agression in a model can make the observer aggressive.
2-children selectively imitate gender-specific behaviour
what data was used in Banduras study
quantitve
ethical considerations in Banduras study
children cannot give consent
harm and ptsd
validity in Banduras study
high internal- lab exp
low ecological
asked to play in a strange room with adults therefore reduces validity
reliability in Banduras study
conditions controlled- 2 mins playing 20 mins observed the participant variable of agression was controlled by assessing each child before hand and matching aggression groups
sampling bias in Banduras study
large sample of 72 children
sample from only 1 nursery therefore hard to generalise
Bandura key theme
external influences on children behaviour
Chaney method
field experiment using a repeated measures design
took place in people home in Australia
Iv and Dv in Chaneys study
iv- if children used standard spacer device
iv- whether child used funhaler
Dv- amount of adherence to their medicine
sample of Chaney
32 children with asthma
aim of chaneys study
if the use of the funhaler improves compliance to the medicine
Materials in chaneys study
- funhaler with a spinning disk and whistle to attract children (positive reinforcement)
procedure in Chaneys study
1- participants approached at home first asked to fill in a questionarre and a interview to fill in about current level of adherence to the standard spacer device
2- given funhaler for 2 weeks and asked to report the next day
3- After sequential use of the Funhaler they were then visited again by the researcher and parents were interviewed and completed the matched questionnaires.
4- Data collected from the self-report related to how easy each device was to use, compliance of parents and children.
results for chaneys study
- funhaler improved children and parents adherence
- 30% of children took the recommended dosage compared to standard spacer device
conclusions for Chaneys study
- the funhaler improved adherence (positive reinforcement)
validity in Chaneys study
high ecological validity (field)
Order effect- biassed questionnaire as the children had experience using the standard device and knew that they were trying a biassed device.
Researchers tried to minimise any bias by not giving any extra explanation or instructions on the Funhalers usage.
reliability in Chaneys study
- procedure standardised and easy to repeat (questions ect)
sampling bias in Chaneys study
random Sampling - reduces bias and can be generilised
wide range of different families in Australia