Core Political Ideas: Socialism Flashcards
What is the meaning of Collectivism to a socialist
Underpins socialism. People will achieve more when they work together, rather than in the self interest.
Equality, welfare and common ownership.
It is right on a moral basis, but also a practical basis.
Human nature suggests we are social animals, preferring to live in
groups.
Bonds of fraternity.
Membership of a community or society allows us true freedom and
fulfilment.
What do socialists think about state planning and state intervention
A strong, centralised state, with a planned economy is necessary to ensure resources are allocated fairly.
Capitalism and the free market cannot be trusted to ensure this.
Marxists advocate complete state control and collective ownership (such as in the Soviet Union) and communist regimes in China and
eastern Europe followed the same approach.
Moderate socialists accept some forms of capitalism, favouring
instead a mixture of public and private ownership.
Socialist collectivism revolves around 5 areas: Industrial relations,
housing, education, industry and healthcare.
Which areas are important for social collectivism
Industrial relations - workers organised in trade unions with barganing rights over terms and conditions
housing - subsidise houses provided by local government
education - The state runs the school system, which is free and available to everyone
industry - Key industries under state control to operate in the national interest
healthcare - National health service funded from general taxation provides free care based on need
What are two criticisms of socialist collectivism
As it emphasises group action and common interest in suppressing human individuality and diversity
Collective objectives can only really be advanced through the agency of the stick this leads to an increased power of the state and erosion of individual freedom
What do socialists think about common humanity
Positive view of human nature.
Co-operation, sociability, rationality.
Competition, in the capitalist sense, damages society, causes divisions and leads to conflict.
People who cooperate rather than compete form connections based on understanding, respect and mutual support.
Moral incentive to work for the common good.
Cooperation boosts economic growth and this benefits everybody.
State intervention (with varying degrees of control according to different types of socialists) ensure that resources are shared, with welfare and redistribution targeting those in the need the most.
What do socialists think about equality
Social equality ensures fairness. Some socialists feel that everybody is born with the potential to be equal. They reject equality of opportunity because it treats people differently based on their abilities. Other socialists feel that because people ARE born with different abilities, there will inevitably be some inequality in relation to rewards.
Social equality reinforces collectivism. If we all work for the common good, it will lead to a fairer and more equal society. E.g. Sweden. Countries with high levels of inequality encourage conflict and
instability.
Social equality is means of satisfying basic human needs. Since all basic human needs are the same, there should be an equal distribution of wealth and resources. This will promote human fulfilment and realise human potential.
What do marxists think about equality
Seeks absolute equality with abolition of private property.
Controlled distribution of resources.
Common ownership.
What do social Democrats think about equality
More limited state intervention.
Seek to reform rather than abolish capitalism.
Seeks to adjust distribution to narrow differences in wealth
and life choices.
What is equality of outcomes for socialists
Maintains that the reward should be based on an individual‘s contribution.
Since this varies from person to person the awards will be different for different people but not big difference as the free market system would have
Supported by fundamentalist socialist (no capitalism) as a way to remove the free markets influence
Opposed by social Democrats and the third way as a form of artificial society
What is equality of opportunity foe socialists
Is based on the principle that everyone should have an equal chance to make the best of their abilities
Should be a level playing field with no artificial barriers to progress for those with ability, talent and positive attitude
Supported by social Democrats and the third way
Opposed by Marxist because it does not seek to remove capitalism and its structural inequalities
What is equality or welfare for socialist
Accepts that human society is unequal but it also maintains that every individual is entitled to an equal minimum standard of living guaranteed by state welfare provision
Supported by social Democrats and the third way because it provides a virtual safety net for the most vulnerable in society
Opposed by Marxists because this warfare provision does not seek to remove capitalism and is structural inequalities
Why do political opposition of socialism reject social equality
It is unjust - treating everybody the same irrespectiveOf their abilities, it does not reward people according to their skills and abilities
It lowers human ambition, motivation and initiative - by removing or downgrading material in centres, leading to economic underperformance
It restricts the liberties of an individual-it can only be implemented through extensive state intervention and control
What is Absolute equality for socialists
Is based on that everyone will receive the same reward, providing they make a contribution to society.
Over time each person will make a broadly equal contribution
Supported by Marxist as the basis of a communist society
Rejected by social Democrats and the third way as in practical and potentially destabilising
What do socialists think about common ownership
Wealth should be owned collectively as we all work together to create it.
Private property causes materialism, jealousy ,and the false belief money makes you happy.
Private property generates social conflict between the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’.
Socialists argue about to what extent common ownership should be applied. Moderate socialists, such as the Labour government of 1945-51 nationalised key strategic industries but left most of the rest of the economy in private hands.
Most modern socialist parties make less of a commitment to public or common ownership.
What do marxists think about social class
Divide society into the ‘have’s – the Bourgeoisie and the ‘have-nots’ – the proletariat.
Capitalism oppresses the proletariat because they have to sell their labour for minimal gains.
The Bourgeoisie exploit this by using the proletariat to profit themselves.
Worker’s revolution is needed to overthrow the bourgeoisie, destroy capital, impose common ownership and eventually eliminate class difference.