CORE 3 (Pg 17-24) Flashcards
Identify the three time horizons the MOC operates in
COPS and FOPS are focused on near- to midterm operational planning. FUPLANS is focused on longer-range planning efforts or non-time-sensitive planning. Nominally COPS looks 24 to 72 hours in the future; FOPS looks 3 – 10 days (sometimes up to four weeks) into the future; FUPLANS looks one month to 20 years in the future
Identify the Current Operations Time Horizon and what COPS focuses on
COPS primarily focuses on monitoring and assessing ongoing operations and the execution of the commander’s intentions. COPS is responsible for overseeing and providing quality control during an operation for the implementation and coordination of the commander’s orders. COPS is focused on “what is happening”
Identify the Future Operations Time Horizon and what FOPS focuses on
The focus of FOPS is the development of plans and orders for operations that are inside the threshold of the long term efforts of the Maritime Planning Group (MPG). FOPS is focused on the “what if?” of operations in that time horizon beyond COPS focus but within the current phase of the operation. Planning processes and products generally require significant coordination with elements internal to the staff; they will also require coordination with entities external to the staff. FOPS and COPS may need to leverage functional expertise
Identify the Future Plans Time Horizon and what FUPLANS focuses on
FUPLANS contains the core group of planning experts for the maritime operations center. They support MOC operations by providing long-range planning as well as coordinating for the staff assessment of and input to the commander’s contribution to the higher headquarters long-range plans such as campaign plans, OPLANs, and OPORDs. FUPLANS focuses on “what’s next”
Identify the concept of the Battle Rhythm and its major purpose
The entire operation of the MOC is driven by the commander’s battle rhythm, which is the deliberate daily cycle of command, staff, and unit activities intended to synchronize current and future operations. A commander’s BR regulates the speed, flow, and sharing of information that support the commander’s decision cycle; furthermore, BR is a cascading process. As a practical matter, the commander’s BR consists of a series of meetings, report requirements, and other activities. It must be designed to minimize the time the commander and key staff members spend attending meetings; it must allow the staff and subordinate commanders time to plan, and direct the activities of subordinates. Within the CFT concept, many WG produce products that serve as input to subsequent events. Establishment of an appropriate BR can be an iterative process. A BR schedule is developed based on when decision makers need to have certain pieces of information before they enter into high-level collaboration or decision events. BR schedules must be aligned with senior and subordinate battle rhythms. Adherence to scheduled BR events is critical to ensure the requisite information is gathered at the appropriate time. Typically, the knowledge management officer (KMO) has the planning lead for development of the initial draft BR
Describe the purpose and contents of a Seven Minute Drill
The seven-minute drill is a tool that identifies information about cross functional teams and events. The seven-minute drill is a way to summarize the purpose for the CFT, its linkage to other CFTs, and its support to decision- making requirements. Seven-minute drills should be reviewed whenever the MOC director feels that the change in mission requires a change in the composition of CFT
Seven-minute Drill should include
Name of board or cell Lead J/N-code When/where does it meet in battle rhythm? Purpose Inputs required from When? Output/Process/Product Time of delivery Membership codes
Describe the purpose and contents of the Staff Battle Rhythm Matrix
A consideration for Battle Rhythm development is the staff’s resources. The ability of the staff to support the events requires deconfliction. The Staff Battle Rhythm Matrix shows required BR participation in the events. The Staff Battle Rhythm Matrix identifies participation and what Centers/Cells are tasked for events
Describe the purpose of MOC standardization and the idea of 80% compatibility
Standardizing the MOCs allows for the establishment of common missions, functions, tasks and procedures; equipping and training. This results in greater commonality across the Fleets and less difference as you cross CHOP lines. Also, common training is provided for MOC operators and the common equipment allows for the establishment of a more economical maintenance and system training. MOCs are only held to be 80% standard due to differences in the Combatant Commanders they support. The 80% is based on manning (number of the 94 core positions filled and required training, AQD, NOBCS accomplished; METs and supporting tasks; and material/equipment/system baseline
Describe the MOC certification process as it relates to what is looked at and how often each MOC is certified
The Navy MOC Training Team will perform a two part review of each MOC every two years. The Team will look at the staffing levels including staffing training, the number of Standard METs and supporting tasks the MOC performs and the material and system baselines installed in the MOC. In addition to this numeric analysis, the MOC Training Team will evaluate the proficiency of the MOC. Feedback of the numeric analysis is forwarded to Fleet MOC Standardization Council (FMSC), made up of the Deputy Commanders of the USFF and PALCFLT with the Team’s certification recommendation. The Team’s analysis of the MOC’s proficiency is sent only to the MOC Commander
Identify the source of the 94 core MOC positions and describe the information/requirements aligned with each position
OPNAV M -3500.42, MOC Standardization Manual, identifies the core MOC positions. Chapter Six of the manual identifies the Position Name, Functional Team the position is associated with, Associated NOBC and AQDs and the number of Standard MOC Procedures Led (Table 6-1). Chapter Four lists the formal training each of the core positons should have
Describe how Navy Planning is tied to Joint Planning and why navy planners should be aware of joint doctrine
Military planning occurs at all levels—from the strategic level and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, through the combatant commanders (CCDRs) at the theater strategic level, across to other Service or functional components, and down to the individual ship, submarine, or aircraft. The levels of planning differ in their complexity, scope, and purpose; however, they are all linked. The operational level is where the crucial link from strategic military objectives to tactical warfighting is established. Navy forces seldom operate independently without coordination with other Services. Navy staffs should be well versed in joint doctrine, particularly JP 3-0, Joint Operations; JP 5-0, Joint Operation Planning; and approved joint terminology. The Navy Planning Process (NPP) links commanders, and the staff, with HHQ, laterally to other Service and functional component commands, and to subordinate commanders. In the case of a Navy component commander, collaborative planning technique should be used with subordinate forces such as carrier strike groups (CSGs) or expeditionary strike groups (ESGs). Likewise, in the case of a CSG or ESG, planning among the warfare commanders, ships, squadron, and other forces attached must be linked
Outline the six phases of an operation
The six phases of an operation are: Phase 0 (Shape) Phase I (Deter) Phase II (Seize Initiative) Phase III (Dominate) Phase IV (Stabilize) Phase V (Enable Civil Authority)
List the two types of planning
Deliberate
Crisis Action
Describe Deliberate Planning
At this theater strategic level there are two forms of planning, deliberate and crisis action. In deliberate planning, the end product is a plan (OPLAN or concept plan (CONPLAN)), that goes on the shelf. Numbered fleets, using the NPP, will frequently support Navy component deliberate planning by developing supporting plans