Copyright in artistic works Flashcards

1
Q

What order (7 things) should you address the problem?

A
  1. Is it original
  2. Does it fall within s1(1)(a) as defined by S4
  3. Is it permanent and is the author qualified
  4. Is the author the owner
  5. Is it within the protection period
  6. Infringement
  7. Defences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 cases on originality

A

Ladbroke v William Hill - originality goes to source not inventiveness
University of London Press: For originality there need only be minimal skill, labour and judgment
Interlego: revision / update of a work must be more than minimal to start the clock again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What section of the CDPA explains “artistic work”

A

s4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 cases explaining graphic work

A

British Northrop: Anything beyond a single line
Wham-O: Engravings on a frisbee
Hi Tech Autoparts: etchings on a carmat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When is a photo of an object a copyright work

A

When the lighting, angle, positioning etc are skillful: Antiquesportfolio.com, Red Bus Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a collage?

A

Two or more things stuck together with adhesive: Creation Records

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a sculpture (2 cases)

A

a 3D work made by the artists hand: metix

Must be intended to be enjoyed for aesthetic purposes alone: Lucasfilm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Minimum threshold for architecture

A

Any fixed structure

Can be dull: Hay v Sloan (suburban housing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a work of artistic craftsmanship

A
  1. Eye appeal and 2. craftsmanship (can be a team): Vermaat v Boncrest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is eye appeal judged (2 cases)

A

Intention of the maker: Hensher v Restawile

Not if it is functional: Merlet v Mothercare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is craftsmanship judged (2 cases)

A

Skill and pride in work - Vermaat v Boncrest

Not made by machine - Guild v Eskander

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Obiter comment in Metix about sculpture

A

An ice sculpture would be protected by copyright

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What order do you address qualification copyright protection

A

s153 (1) AUTHOR is domiciled / resident / citizen of a CONVENTION country (Art 2(6) Berne Convention at material time
OR
first PUBLISHED in the UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the material time?

A

s154(4)
UNpublished: time of creation
PUBLISHED: time of publication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is publication

A

Issue of copies, availability online, NOT exhibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which section deal with ownership and what does it say?

A

S11 - Author is the owner
UNLESS
made in course of employment (eg Beloff v Pressdram)

17
Q

What section deals with joint ownership and what does it say

A

S10 - Contributions must not be distinct. BUT see Beckingham v Hodgens - young at heart riff

18
Q

What is the protection period for copyright (and the sections)

A

S12(2) Life + 70

S52(2) Reduced to 25 years if exploited commercially

19
Q

Where are the infringing acts listed

A

S16

20
Q

What is the test for infringement of copyright

A

Substantial taking. Designers Guild Test:
1. Identify the features of the Ds design which are alleged to be copied
2. If there is similarity plus opportunity for copying the burden is on D to show no copying
3. Is the copied element a substantial element of the source work (not Ds).
Test is impressionistic, goes to quality not quantity when considering importance to source work.

21
Q

Two things to remember about the Designers Guild test

A

Do not break the copied work into its constituent parts: ladbroke v William Hill
Red Bus: look to overall composition, distinctive elements

22
Q

Where does it say that copying can be direct or indirect?

A

s16(3)(b)

23
Q

An example of indirect copying

A

CD cover based on poster based on photo: Gabrin v Universal

24
Q

An example of subconscious copying

A

ABCKO v Harrisongs

25
Q

Is there a parody exception

A

No: Schweppes v Wellington

26
Q

What section says that a 3D copy of a 2D work infringes and vice versa

A

17(3)

27
Q

What case says there is no clearcut rule for the dividing line between copying of an idea or an expression

A

Baigent & Lee

28
Q

Where is the provision on authorising infringing ats and what is the definition

A

S16(2). Authorise = sanction, countenance or approve: Moorhouse

29
Q

Which sections apply to commercial dealings with infringing copies

A

S22&23 - and see Pensher - infringing doors in a block of flats = secondary infringement.

30
Q

What is the main defence to infringement of a design

A

s51 - making something to the spec of a design document, BUT doesn’t count for works of art.

31
Q

When was what was copied a mere idea

A

Norowzian

32
Q

When was a design not permanent

A

Hensher

33
Q

Independent creation was a defence

A

Kleeneze

34
Q

What section says that copyright prevails over a design right where both exist

A

s236