Conveyances & The Recording System Flashcards

1
Q

2 steps of a conveyance

A

• The conveyance of land is usually a two-step process: the land sale contract (conveys equitable title) and the closing (conveys legal title).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

land sale contract (SOF & exception; what must be included)

A

• A. The Land Sale Contract must be in writing and signed by the party to be charged (SOF)

[• a. Exception: Doctrine of Part Performance (for specific performance only):

– allows the buyer to enforce an oral contract by specific performance, if he can provide proof of at least two of the following:
»> Full or substantial payment (more than rent) by the purchaser
»> Physical possession by the purchaser
»> Substantial improvements by the purchaser)

– seller enforcement – a seller an enforce can oral land sale contract only if the seller conveys the property to the buyer

– BUT NOTE: if the buyer is a CURRENT TENANT whose “purchase payments” are equal to his current rent, and his improvements are of the type that a tenant would normally make, this will FAIL TO SATISFY part performance because it does not show unequivocally that the acts of part performance unequivocally prove the existence of a purchase and sale contracts]

– The Land Sale Contract must DESCRIBE THE LAND in such a manner that the property may be located with certainty, such as a street address

– The Land Sale Contract must also IDENTIFY THE PARTIES and state a sale price (i.e., a land sale contract requires consideration)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

real estate agent/broker (define; types of listing agreements; unauthorized practice of law)

A

• B. Real Estate Agent/Broker: The agent typically works for the seller and earns her commission when she finds a “ready, willing, and able” buyer. Traditionally, the commission was due even if the buyer repudiates the contract. Most modern cases award the commission only if the sale actually closes or the seller repudiates the contract.

– Types of Listing Agreements. If a broker has an “exclusive right-to-sell” listing agreement, the broker is entitled to a commission if the seller accepts an offer to purchase during the exclusive period, regardless of who procures the buyer or when the closing occurs. If a broker has an “open” or “non-exclusive” listing agreement, the broker is entitled to a commission only if the broker procures the buyer.

– Unauthorized Practice of Law. In most states, agents may fill in the blanks on standard land sale contracts, but they may not draft deeds, mortgages, or other documents that transfer interests in land. In addition, agents may not conduct closings or express opinions on the status of title or zoning laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

title insurance

A

• C. Title Insurance

– A title insurance policy insures that “good record title” to the property exists as of the policy’s date, and the insurer agrees to defend the record title if litigated.
»> It insures against forgery or lack of delivery of an instrument in the chain of title, as well as the disability of a grantor in the chain of title.
»> Title insurance does not insure against claims “outside” the record, such as adverse possessors, boundary disputes, implied or prescriptive easements, zoning ordinances, or hazardous waste.

– Title insurance may be taken out by either the owner of the property or the mortgage lender.
»> An “owner’s policy” protects only the person who owns the policy (i.e., the named insured) and does not run with the land to subsequent purchasers.
»> A “lender’s policy” follows any assignment of the mortgage loan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

equitable conversion (what it means for buyer/seller; result of buyer/seller death; doctrine of exoneration; how does seller’s insurance factor in)

A

• Equitable Conversion (majority view): Upon execution of the PSA, the buyer is considered the equitable owner of the property (unless the contract provides otherwise).

> > > this means that, prior to closing, the RISK OF LOSS rests with the BUYER (assuming no fault on the part of the seller)

> > > if the buyer dies before closing, the property will pass to the persons entitled to the buyer’s real estate at the buyer’s death (***DEVISEES inherit real property)

> > > By contrast, if the seller dies prior to closing, the proceeds of the sale belong to the persons entitled to the seller’s personal property at the seller’s death. (***LEGATEES inherit personal property)

> > > reminder: The death of either party (or both parties) does not discharge the parties’ duties under the contract.

– common law doctrine of exoneration - the person who inherits real property will be able to compel the person who inherits the personal property to pay off the encumbrances on the property (outstanding mortgage, payment owed to seller)

– If a buyer is held liable for a loss before closing, the seller’s insurance proceeds, if any, must be credited to the buyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Implied Covenants Given by Sellers in Land Contracts - conveyance of marketable title

SUPER FRIGGIN IMPORTANT

A

– 1. seller will convey marketable title (i.e., a title free from reasonable doubt and free from non-frivolous lawsuits) at the closing (or, in the case of a land sale contract, at the end of payments)

• a. title is “unmarketable” if there are defects in the chain of title, including:

– The property was obtained by the seller by adverse possession (with no judgment)
»> i.e. the AP must quiet title before the sale

– There are encumbrances (easements/covenants/mortgages) on the title that will not be resolved at closing
»> a beneficial easement (e.g., a utility easement) will not render the title unmarketable

– The seller’s current use of the property violates existing zoning laws
– **BUT NOTE: if the seller plans to use the sale proceeds to remedy any defects (pay off a mortagage, lien, etc.), the title will be deemed marketable

  • b. but the title is MARKETABLE despite the fact that the buyer’s intended use violates existing zoning laws
  • other notes:

– The implied covenant of marketable title applies even if the contract calls for conveyance by quitclaim deed

if there are marketable title issues, you have to give the seller until the closing to fix those issues – and once you close, you can’t pursue claims under the PSA like “failure to convey marketable title”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

2 Implied Covenants Given by Sellers in Land Contracts

A
  • conveyance of marketable title

- seller has not made any false statements of material fact or failed to disclose any latent material defects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Implied Covenants Given by Sellers in Land Contracts - false statements and warranties

A

– 2. seller has not made any false statements of material fact or failed to disclose any latent material defects

• most states require sellers to give buyers a written statement disclosing facts about the property

• in most states, a broad “as is” clause is a defense to claims based on negligent misrepresentation or failure to disclose; an “as is” clause is not a defense for claims based on intentional fraud or concealment
»> however, disclaimers for specific issues will likely be upheld

• CAVEAT EMPTOR: sellers do not make implied warranties of fitness or habitability, except when a NEW HOME is sold by a BUILDER/DEVELOPER (i.e., implied warranty of skillful construction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Implied Covenants Given by Sellers in Land Contracts - time of the essence

A

– 3. time is NOT of the essence in real estate contracts, unless the contract provides otherwise (or the circumstances dictate such a term)

thus, specific performance may be sought even if one of the parties tenders late (but that party would be responsible for any damages caused by the delay)
»> remember, both the buyer and SELLER can claim specific performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the closing - deed vs land sale contract

A

– 1. Upon closing, the deed supersedes the land sale contract; thus, after closing, the buyer must look exclusively to the deed for any rights, warranties, and claims of title (in other words, the implied warranty to provide marketable title is discharged at closing).

• The deed does not supersede fraud or “implied warranty of skillful construction” claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the closing - to transfer title from seller to buyer, there must be: 2 main elements; flesh out first element

A

(LEAD – lawfully executed and delivered)

A “lawfully executed deed”

– i. A writing

– ii. Signed by the grantor/vendor
»> The grantee usually does not sign the deed, but is bound by any covenants therein by accepting the deed

– iii. identification of the grantor and grantee, AND
»> **can’t just call them “grantor/grantee”!
»> if the grantee’s name is left blank, some courts presume that the person taking delivery has authority to fill it in, thus validating the transfer

– iv. A description of the land sufficient so that an objective party may locate it with certainty
»> if described in multiple ways and there is a discrepancy, the PHYSICAL description will take precedence over the QUANTITY description
»> **NOTE: when there is a discrepancy between the amount of land ACTUALLY being conveyed, and the amount of land STATED IN THE DEED - we will give the purchaser the amount of land that was ACTUALLY conveyed

(**unlike PSA looks like no price term needed b/c no consideration here - not exactly a “contract”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the closing - to transfer title from seller to buyer, there must be: 2 main elements; flesh out second element generally

A

(LEAD – lawfully executed and delivered)

The deed must be “delivered” to be effective

– delivery: grantor must manifest the PRESENT INTENT (shown by words and/or conduct) to be IMMEDIATELY BOUND by the conveyance (in other words, did the grantor intend to part with legal control of the property)?
»> **a deed not properly delivered is VOID
»> this is a LEGAL standard, not a LITERAL standard of delivery

– most courts hold that if the grantor executes a deed and gives it to another with instructions to give it to the grantee upon the grantor’s death, the grantor’s intent was to presently convey a future interest to the grantee (either a remainder, with a life estate reserved in the grantor, or an executory interest), and so the gift is inter vivos, not testamentary
»> BUT FOR THIS TO HAPPEN, GRANTOR MUST RELINQUISH ABSOLUTE & UNCONDITIONAL CONTROL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the closing - covenants of title (quitclaim deeds)

A

– 1. Quitclaim Deeds: No covenants of title (grantor conveys only what she has, which may be nothing)

**so if you failed to sue for marketable title under the PSA, you are SOL now

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the closing - covenants of title (general warranty deeds - three PRESENT covenants)

A

• a. Three Present Covenants, which may be breached only AT closing (which is when the SOL starts to run):

“I own it; I can sell it; without encumbrances”

  • Covenant of seisin (grantor owns the property)
  • Covenant of right to convey (grantor has the legal right to convey the property)
  • Covenant against encumbrances (there are no mortgages, liens, etc. of which the grantee is unaware)
  • note: The future covenants run with the land (and are enforceable by successors), but the present covenants do not (and thus may be enforced only by the party to whom they are made).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the closing - covenants of title (general warranty deeds - three FUTURE covenants)

A

• b. Three Future Covenants, which may be breached only if the grantee is disturbed in possession AFTER closing (the SOL starts to run upon such breach):

“No one will bug you; If they do, I’ll defend you; After I defend you, I’ll take any steps necessary to make sure this never happens again”

• Covenant of quiet enjoyment (grantor will indemnify grantee against future claimants)

• Covenant of warranty (grantor will defend grantee’s title against lawful claims) in this instance, lawful means successful (not just colorable/nonfrivolous)
»> The grantee must give the grantor notice of such claims
»> If the grantee defends a claim and prevails, the grantee is not entitled to reimbursement because the claim was not “lawful”

  • Covenant of further assurances (grantor will perform any administrative or ministerial steps necessary to perfect title)
  • note: The future covenants run with the land (and are enforceable by successors), but the present covenants do not (and thus may be enforced only by the party to whom they are made).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the closing - covenants of title (damages for breach of covenants in a PSA)

A

• d. Damages for breach of a PSA covenant are limited to the consideration received by the covenantor (and not current FMV), plus interest

17
Q

the closing - covenants of title (special warranty deeds)

A

– 3. Special Warranty Deeds (authorized by statute). Two covenants by grantor (made on behalf of the grantor only, not his or her predecessors):

  • i. grantor has not conveyed the estate to others (i.e., no double-dealing)
  • ii. the estate is free from encumbrances created by the grantor
18
Q

recording system - general common law rule; purpose of recording acts; when recording is not needed; shelter rule

A
  • A. Common Law: First-in-Time is First-in-Right (whomever received the conveyance first wins)
  • B. Purpose of Recording Acts: to protect subsequent bona fide purchasers and mortgagees (but not judgment creditors, unless the recording act so provides)

– 3. A recording is not necessary for a deed to be enforceable between the grantor and grantee

– 4. A person who is not a BFP (because he or she did not give value or had notice of prior claims) may still be protected as a BFP by the “shelter rule” if that person acquired the property from a BFP.
»> purpose is to protect the BFP and allow them to convey their land
»> **applies even when his transferee had actual knowledge of a prior unrecorded interest or did not take for substantial pecuniary value (i.e. a donee)

19
Q

recording system - bona fide purchaser (define; notice categories; when is notice determined; where will a subsequent BFP fail to be protected)

A

a bona fide purchaser is one who:

– 1. gives substantial new value and
»> i.e. satisfying an existing debt, being a judgement creditor, or getting the property as a gift/devise is INSUFFICIENT

– 2. takes without notice of prior claims; notice may be:

  • actual notice
  • record notice (but only if filing is in the proper chain of title)

• inquiry notice (all purchasers have a duty to inspect property; thus, if a prior claimant is living on the property, a subsequent purchaser is deemed to have notice, whether or not she inspects)
»> inquiry notice would also include reference in the record to unfiled documents if a reasonable person would investigate such documents

– BFP status is determined at the time of PURCHASE (i.e., giving value); notice acquired after purchase is irrelevant.
»> ***for a buyer of a home, it would be determined at the time of CLOSING (note – a seller can mortgage his property between the execution of the PSA and the closing because he is still technically the LEGAL owner)

– **the recording acts do not protect subsequent BFPs against interests that arise by operation of law, such as implied easements and adverse possession, because there is no instrument to record in order to perfect such interests – instead, the BFP would take SUBJECT TO that interest

20
Q

pure race statutes

A

– 1. (Pure) Race Statutes (DE, NC, LA): first to record wins—no exceptions (notice is irrelevant)

• in race jurisdictions, the statute will typically call the second purchaser a “purchaser for value,” instead of a “purchaser for value, without notice thereof,” b/c they don’t care about BFPs

21
Q

notice statutes (& distinguish from race-notice)

A

– 2. Notice Statutes (about 50% of states): A subsequent bona fide purchaser or mortgagee wins—no exceptions (i.e. last BPF always wins! doesn’t need to have recorded!)

• MBE Language: “A conveyance of an interest in land shall not be valid against any subsequent purchaser for value, without notice thereof, unless the conveyance is recorded” or “No conveyance or mortgage of real property shall be good against subsequent purchasers for value and without notice unless the same be recorded according to law.”

– **key note: if the word “first” is included, it is Race Notice; if the word “first” is excluded, it is Notice

22
Q

race-notice statutes (& distinguish from notice)

A

– 3. Race-Notice Statutes (about 50% of states): A subsequent BFP or BF mortgagee wins, but only if she records her deed or mortgage before the prior claimant records (i.e. first BFP to record wins!)

• MBE Language: “A conveyance of an interest in land shall not be valid against any subsequent purchaser for value, without notice thereof, whose conveyance is first recorded” or “No unrecorded conveyance or mortgage of real property shall be good against subsequent purchasers for value without notice, who shall first record.”

– **key note: if the word “first” is included, it is Race Notice; if the word “first” is excluded, it is Notice

23
Q

chain of title & notice

A

A purchaser or mortgagee has constructive notice of all prior, properly recorded deeds, mortgages, liens, etc.; “properly recorded” means that the deed, mortgage, etc. is filed in the proper chain of title.

24
Q

chain of title - instances where “recorded” deeds are NOT in the proper chain of title and thus do not constitute constructive notice: The Wild Deed (what it is and typical hypo)

A
  • The Wild Deed: a recorded deed that isn’t connected to the chain of title – it doesn’t impart constructive notice because a subsequent purchaser could not feasible find it
  • The Wild Deed Hypothetical: In 1950, O buys Blackacre. In 1990, O sells Blackacre to A, who does not record her deed. In 1995, A sells Blackacre to B, who immediately records (the A-B deed is the “wild deed”). In 2000, O sells Blackacre to C, who immediately records and has no actual or inquiry notice of the O-A or A-B transfers. Who wins between B and C?

– Answer: C. The A-B deed is not in C’s chain of title; thus, C is a BFP without notice. In a grantor-grantee search, C would search O’s title and find O purchased Blackacre in 1950 and never disposed of it (because the O-A deed was not recorded). There is no reasonable way for C to find the A-B deed. Thus, C wins as a BFP without notice (who was first to file in the proper chain of title).

25
Q

chain of title - instances where “recorded” deeds are NOT in the proper chain of title and thus do not constitute constructive notice: Estoppel by Deed (what it is and typical hypo)

A
  • Estoppel by Deed: one who conveys realty in which he has no interest is estopped from denying the validity of that conveyance if he subsequently acquires the title that he had previously purported to transfer
  • Estoppel by Deed Hypothetical: In 1950, O buys Blackacre. In 1980, O considers selling Blackacre to A, but decides against such a sale. Nevertheless, in 1980, A sells Blackacre to B by warranty deed, who immediately records. In 1990, O finally decides to sell Blackacre to A, who immediately records the deed. Who wins between A and B?

– Answer: B. Even though A did not own Blackacre at the time he sold it to B, under the doctrine of estoppel by deed, a person who conveys property (by warranty deed) he or she does not own, is deemed by operation of law to have conveyed it if he or she later acquires the property. Thus, the law assumes that A transferred Blackacre to B, so B wins.

– Assume A sells Blackacre to C in 1995. Who wins between B and C?

• Answer: C. In a grantor-grantee search, C would search A’s title and find A purchased Blackacre in 1990 and never disposed of it (because the A-B deed was recorded prior to that time—before A owned Blackacre). As a result, C is not expected to find the A-B deed. Thus, C wins as a BFP without notice (who was first to file in the proper chain of title).

– ***Estoppel by deed does NOT apply if the grantor conveyed the property by quitclaim deed.

– REMEMBER THAT THE RECORDING STATUTES WILL TYPICALLY ALTER THE OUTCOME HERE

26
Q

PSA - buyer’s remedies for seller’s breach of implied warranties

A

– buyer’s remedies for breach of implied warranties (must sue prior to closing):

  • specific performance with an abatement of the purchase price in an amount reflecting the title defect
  • rescind the contract and sue for damages for breach
  • require seller to quiet title (some jurisdictions)
27
Q

the closing - delivery (rebuttable presumptions; delivery to a 3p)

A

– rebuttable presumptions: when delivery is in doubt, the courts rely on various rebuttable presumptions:
»> physical possession of the deed by the grantor raises a presumption of non-delivery
»> physical possession of a properly executed deed by the grantee raises a presumption of delivery
»> the recording of the deed raises a presumption that it was delivered

– delivery to a third party:
»> If the grantor gives the deed to an agent of the grantee (e.g., the grantee’s attorney or friend) to deliver to the grantee, the delivery requirement will generally be satisfied at that moment.
»> If the grantor gives the deed to an agent of the grantor (e.g., the grantor’s attorney) to deliver to the grantee, the delivery requirement will be not satisfied until the grantor’s agent delivers the deed to the grantee, which must occur before the grantor’s death.

28
Q

the closing - delivery (oral conditions; subsequent cancellation; acceptance requirement; consideration)

A

– delivery with oral conditions: these conditions will automatically drop out

– subsequent cancellation: once proper delivery has been made, the deed may not be cancelled by destroying it or returning it to the grantor; instead, the grantee must re-deed the property to the grantor (even if the grantee never recorded her deed)

– Acceptance of the deed by the grantee is also required, but acceptance is generally presumed.

– consideration: this is NOT required for conveyance of the deed (b/c some are gifts, and for those that are not, we have the land sale contract)

29
Q

the closing - void deeds (6 scenarios & key note on void deeds and BFPs)

A

– a deed obtained by fraud in the execution (i.e., the grantor did not know that the document she was executing was a deed)

– a deed (or other recordable document, such as a mortgage or release of mortgage) that is materially altered is “void” at least to the extent of the alteration

– if the grantor’s signature is forged

– a deed executed under physical duress (i.e., serious violence or threats of serious violence) is void

– a deed to a dead person or non-existing entity

– a deed executed by a person who has no ownership interest in the property at the time of conveyance (**subject to the doctrine of Estoppel by Deed)
»> However, if the grantee takes possession of the property, the grantee would have “color of title” for purposes of adverse possession.

NOTE: a “void” deed will not protect a subsequent BFP

30
Q

the closing - voidable deeds (2 scenarios)

A

– a deed obtained by fraud in the inducement is “voidable” by the grantor until the property is conveyed to a bona fide purchaser

– a deed obtained by undue influence is also “voidable.”