Controversies in Intelligence Flashcards

1
Q

What was Binet’s approach to measuring intelligence?

A

He wanted to find a systematic way to identify people with learning problems, and created IQ tests for educational purposes (in rank order)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was Yerke’s approach to measuring intelligence?

A

He argued that intelligence is innate and not dependent on educational or environmental influences; he created the alpha and beta tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How could the content of Yerke’s tests be potentially criticized?

A

They only measured acculturation and were used to justify racial and ethnic discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the two components of the WWI US army group administered IQ tests

A

Alpha tests for literates; Beta tests for illiterates and non English speakers (match symbols, continue patterns, speed tests, fill in blanks, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was suspicious about the distribution of scores obtained from the WWI army tests?

A

Zero was by far the most common value in several of the alpha tests (mode); highly skewed; they assumed people must be stupid; Beta tests were also skewed with many zeros

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How was the average mental age of those who completed the WWI army tests calculated and what was dodgy about this?

A

The reference group used for standardization were a group of 62 students and businessmen, defined as having a mental age of 16; so the average white American male (with a mental age calculated at 13.08 yrs) performed worse than this reference group at the army tests; ethnic groups were found to have even lower mental ages (10-12 yrs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe US eugenics policies after WWI

A

Strict immigration quotas into the US were introduced for ethnic groups found to have low IQ in WWI army data (e.g. European Jews; up to 6 million); compulsory sterilization for “feeble-minded” people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the key arguments put forward in “the bell curve”?

A

Because IQ is largely inherited (not due to environmental factors/SES and stays the same across the lifespan), educational interventions to increase IQ have either been unsuccessful or transitory; Society will become more stratified by intelligence, with the least intelligent representing a criminal underclass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the counterarguments to arguments about the bell curve?

A

Educational interventions tend to be short so it’s amazing they had any effect at all; their measure of SES is too crude (parent education x income)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What’s the evidence for a significant genetic contribution to intelligence?

A

You get a higher correlation (.86) between the IQs of identical twins than between non-identical twins (.60); this points to a heritability estimate for intelligence of about 50%; twins reared apart have IQs correlating at .76

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the criticisms about the twins evidence for a genetic contribution to intelligence?

A

Twins reared apart are more likely to have similar environments (restricted range); identical twins are likely to be treated similarly (same looks/characteristics); shared uterine environment accounts for up to 20% of shared variance; genetic influence differs according to social class; slight differences in genetic intelligence might trigger environmental multipliers even though just the variance in genetics can account for the whole difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Heritability estimates were found to be much higher for upper-middle classes than lower social classes. What’s a potential reason for this?

A

Because upper-middle environments are more homogenous so there’s little variation (genetics is all that’s left to vary); less restriction of range for lower as the environment may be much more variable and able to account for more of IQ variance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If IQ is largely inherited, what implications does this have for its mutability?

A

It has no implications of whether it can be changed or not; no effect on the extent to which it can be affected by the environment (e.g. short-sightedness and height are inherited but both can be improved)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the Flynn effect and what theoretical implications does this have for intelligence test scores?

A

Refers to huge observed increases in IQ test scores from generation to generation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the relationships between intelligence and biological measures?

A

IQ tests correlate between .3 and .4 with simple reaction time, inspection time and some EEG measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What implications have relationships between intelligence and biological measures been argued to have?

A

That it indicates that IQ represents a fundamental brain process

17
Q

What are the counterarguments to the arguments about the relationship between intelligence and biological measures?

A

That even fundamental brain anatomy is influenced by experience (and IQ too)

18
Q

What real world variables do IQ correlate with?

A

Academic achievement (.5- .8); job performance (.3-.6); socio-economic status; quality of life indices (health status, law breaking, family integrity)

19
Q

Why might the relationship between IQ and job performance be spurious, or at least exaggerated, according to Sternberg?

A

Correlation doesn’t mean causality; could be circular – people may already be preselected on the basis of IQ; could just be about the ability to do well in testing situations