Contrast Red Queen and the Wright Landscape metaphor Flashcards

1
Q

Can adaptation be brought about by both abiotic and biotic changes?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give examples of abiotic changes.

A

Climatic variables like temperature or rainfall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give examples of biotic changes.

A

New predator, parasite or competitor introduction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Are abiotic changes fast?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Are biotic changes fast?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which is better for modelling abiotic changes, Red Queen or Wright Metaphor? Why?

A

Wright metaphor, because it is more rigid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which is better for modelling biotic changes, Red Queen or Wright Metaphor? Why?

A

Red Queen, as it is better at explaining dynamic and rapid changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who created the Wright Metaphor and when?

A

Sewell Wright in 1932

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does the Wright Metaphor visualise reproductive fitness?

A

As a topology, where peaks are fitness optima and troughs are fitness minima

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the position of an individual in the landscape depend on?

A

Their genetic composition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In the Wright Metaphor, does an individual’s position on the topology change?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In the Wright Metaphor, what causes the distribution of individuals to change?

A

Changes to population allele frequency

I think basically the topology changes but the individuals stay in the same position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In the Wright Metaphor, information is conveyed by a combination of…

A

landscape topology and individual position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In the Wright Metaphor, if the topology is rugged, and peaks are steeper, what does this show?

A

That selection is stronger and there is greater disparity in fitness between genotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In the Wright Metaphor, if the topology is broader, and peaks are flatter, what does this show?

A

That selection is weaker and there is less disparity in fitness between genotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In the Wright Metaphor, what does it show if individuals are clustered around a peak?

A

Mutation rate is low, allowing more individuals to achieve optimum fitness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

In the Wright Metaphor, what does it show if there are fewer individuals at the peak?

A

Mutation rate is high and less individuals have achieved optimum fitness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Populations always move down peaks. True or false?

A

False, they only ever move UP

19
Q

Why can individuals only move up peaks?

A

Because deleterious mutations are removed by selection, so organism fitness either stays the same or improves (moves up)

20
Q

What is a hill-climbing mutation?

A

Beneficial mutations of small effect that allow movement of a whole population up a peak

The mutation initially arose in one organism but then spread through the population as it was advantageous

21
Q

Why are hill-climbing mutations generally of small effect?

A

As large mutations are often deleterious

22
Q

Rugged fitness landscapes, where there are multiple optima, contain numerous peaks separated by adaptive valleys. How do individuals move peaks?

A

In a phenomena called ‘peak jumping’ as they cannot move down in the fitness landscape

23
Q

Peak-jumping occurs via two major mechanisms. What are these?

A
  1. Peak shifts

2. Wright’s shifting balance theory

24
Q

How do peak shifts occur?

A

Mutations in regulatory genes cause major phenotypic effects. These are either deleterious and removed or beneficial, causing organisms to jump to a new optima.

25
Q

What is Wright’s Shifting Balance Theory?

A

When a subpopulation is exposed to drift, it shifts across the landscape through the trough of an adaptive valley, as reduced genetic diversity produces minimal fitness. The subpop. is then at the base of a new peak and can begin hill-climbing towards new optima.

26
Q

Who critiqued Wright’s Shifting Balance Theory? What did they say?

A

Coyne et al., 1997

There is support for each stage of the theory independently but no cases in which all three come together to produce an adaptive shift

27
Q

In the Wright Metaphor, evolution is thought to halt at a peak and recommence only under…

A

changing conditions

This means the Wright Metaphor is insufficient to explain rapid biotic changes that are continually evolving

28
Q

Who put forward the RQ hypothesis and when?

A

Leigh Van Valen in 1973

29
Q

What is the RQ hypothesis?

A

That adaptation is driven by biological factors in a cyclical process that requires perpetual change in all players to ensure their survival

30
Q

The RQ hypothesis is named after a quote from Alic Through The Looking Glass by Lewis Carroll, when the Red Queen says ‘…it takes all the running you can do to stay in the same place…’, what does this mean in terms of evolution?

A

Players are in a constant evolutionary arms race, evolving to out-compete each other but remaining constantly locked in competition

31
Q

What is Fluctuating Red Queen (FRQ)?

A

Fluctuating selection drives continuous, time-lagged oscillations in allele frequency in both parties

32
Q

Explain FRQ in terms of exploiters and their victims.

A

Exploiters track the common genotype, allowing the rare genotype to become common, then the exploiter shifts its preference to the new common genotype, and the cycle continues

33
Q

Give a referenced example of FRQ in snails.

A

Jokela et al., 2009

P. antipodarum snails are hosts for nematodes. Snails exist in mixed sexual and asexual pops.
Sexual populations remained stable, whilst asexual populations did not. Common clonal types became more susceptible to parasites and were eventually driven to extinction, whilst rare clonal types became more prevalent as common types declined.

34
Q

Give a referenced example of FRC in worms.

A

Morran et al., 2011

C. elegans worms are hosts for parasite S. marcescens. Mating system was genetically manipulated so that worms existed in either sexual, self-fertilising or mixed populations.
Parasite introduction = self-fertilising populations driven to extinction, whilst sexual populations displayed reciprocal coevolution.

35
Q

Why did sexual populations persist in response to FRC in both Jokela et al. (2009) and Morran et al. (2011)?

A

Because sex increases variance by recombination, creating new genotypes that have higher fitness than the parents in response to parasite invasion

36
Q

What is Escalatory Red Queen (ERQ)?

A

Directional selection favours extreme phenotypes, which drives the evolution of an adaptive trait. The traits in both parties exceed in value until a stable equilibrium is reached or one player can no longer compete.

37
Q

Under ERQ what limits coevolution?

A

When traits become too costly to produce

38
Q

Give an example of EQR between a reptile and an amphibian.

A

Geffeney et al., 2002

Predator is T. sirtalis (garter snake) and prey is newts of the genus Taricha.
Newts produce tetrodotoxin (TTX) to discourage snakes.
Snakes display toxin resistance.
In areas of high snake resistance newts produce more toxin.

39
Q

Geffeney et al., 2002:

How do garter snakes resist the effects of TTX?

A

They have developed TTX-resistant sodium channels in their skeletal muscle

40
Q

Give an example of ERQ in bean weevils.

A

Crudgington et al., 2000

C. maculatus males and females are under SAC.
Males have sclerotic penile spines that break off in female repro tract and injure her. Therefore she cannot mate again for long periods which ensures that the male’s sperm fertilise her eggs. Plus males release chemicals that stimulate female oviposition, which enter her haemolymph more quickly through wounds.
In response females have coevolved the behaviour of kicking males during copulation; this significantly reduces male copulation time and damage to repro tract.
Spines/kicking phenotypes have increased over time.

41
Q

So in conclusion, the Wright metaphor is better for studying…

A

slower, abiotic changes that stop/start

42
Q

So in conclusion, RQD are more useful for studying…

A

rapid, biotic changes that involved cyclical or escalatory interactions between two players

43
Q

Who described ERQ dynamics in water striders?

A

Perry and Rowe, 2011

Clasps in males and shields in females

44
Q

Who described the genetic robustness of viruses on the Wright Landscape? What did they say?

A

Lauring et al., 2013

Viruses have v. high mutation rate thus are inherently robust to mutations.
Their fitness topology is therefore a series of low hills, as when selection knocks a genotype away from one optimum it is likely to land on another peak.