Contractual Liability To Third Parties Flashcards
How do you know if only personally liable?
Depends on what kind of transaction eg if their name is on shares, will be personally liable. This happened on Glasgow bank cases, only personal or company!
Also circumstances of case
Not just ‘trustee’
Will all trustees be liable?
Only those who contracted but those who later acquiesce also (Torchetti v Glasgow Bank)
Do trustees have right of relief?
Yes, trust patrimony can shelter them from personal liability and allow them to exercise right to recompense (Cuningham v Montgomerie)
Depends on circumstances of case (Lumsden v Buchanan)
Partnerships have unlimited personal liability, doesn’t matter if didn’t mean to contract personally
Cuningham v Montgomerie
Could seek redress from trust patrimony first, shield. Only where patrimony exhausted
Can all trustees be liable for transaction where only carried out by some?
Yes, if you later acquiesce (Roberts v City of Glasgow Bank)
Is it unfair to impose personal liability on intra vires contracts?
Yes, trustees don’t share gains, why share pains?
Trustee chill
Confusing for 3rd parties, contracting with trust, not 3rd parties
Won’t be helped by professional indemnity as not at fault
Why is personal liability desirable?
3rd party cannot know extent of estate, further safety net if funds not met
Imposes v high standard of care
Trustees owe duty to beneficiaries to stipulate, if don’t then there a shame
Approach in Guernsey, UTC, SA
Disclosure principle
If you tell someone you are acting as trustee, shouldn’t be liable
Anglo-American
Trustees personally liable, not just trust assets
If breach of trust, no right to reimburse
But suffer if trustee insolvent
Ultra vires ?
See s4 1921 act - any power listed therein
Voidable by beneficiaries if gratuitous or 3rd party in bad faith
Now s2 - acts nor challengeable if contrary to trust purposes or terms
SLC proposal
If disclose, no personal liability!!!
Advantages of no personal liability unless not disclosed
Much clearer
Less emphasis on as trustee - bit silly
Removed trustee chill
Not punishing trustees excessively
In which case was it ultra vires to invest in company rather than bank?
Sanders v Sanders
Are trustees personally liable at first instance?
Yes, but can exclude by saying ‘as trustee’