Contracts, Sales, Patents/ Copyrights Flashcards
Risk of loss passes for Nonmerchant seller:
On Tender of Delivery
(Risk passes when pay for (tender delivery), so buyer has risk of loss even if doesn’t have physical possession/ hasn’t picked up item yet)
What happens when a party fails to perform something he or she is contractually
obligated to do (ie, when there’s a breach of contract):
Remedies (if the party has no defenses (contract enforceable))
When does risk of loss transfer if it’s a merchant seller?
On Actual Delivery
(When buyer takes physical possession of item. If paid for but hasn’t picked up from the store, the merchant still has risk of loss)
Free Along Side (FAS)
Shipment Contract –> buyer has risk of loss
FAS is a price term that requires the seller to deliver the goods alongside of a specified vessel. Risk of loss passes to buyer when seller gets goods alongside the vessel.
Cost, Insurance, Freight (CIF)
Shipment contract –> Buyer has risk of loss
CIF means the contract includes the cost of the goods, insurance, and freight. Risk of loss inviter during shipment.
Free on board (FOB)
Could be shipment or destination contract, depending on the city named after FOB.
If seller’s city: risk transfers when in seller’s city, so it’s a shipment contract and the buyer has risk of loss during shipment.
If buyer’s city: risk transfers when in buyer’s city, so it’s a destination contract and the seller has risk of loss during shipment.
Who has risk of loss of seller sends nonconforming goods?
Seller.
Risk of loss during shipment remains with the seller, regardless of the shipping terms, UNLESS buyer accepts he nonconforming goods.
Specific performance for
Items unique or land*
Cover
Buyer may “cover” (buy comparable goods and sue the seller for the difference between he contract price and the cost of cover)
(Difference between cost of original contract and cost of cover = extra amount you had to pay bc seller breached)
Replevin
When suing for goods that you believe are in the possession of another wrongfully
Want an item because it’s unique and I cannot cover (buy comparable goods and sue for the increased cost I had to pay), and can’t sue for specific performance –> it’s replevin
To establish a cause of action based on strict liability in tort for personal injuries resulting from using a defective product, the plaintiff must prove:
- Defective
- Dangerous
- Dealer (was engaged in the business of selling the product)
Voidable title occurs when
Accept a bad check
Good faith requirement that must be met by a merchant
UCC imposes an obligation of good faith on both parties to a contract. For merchants, this includes the duty to observe reasonable commercial standards
For a rain check to meet requirements of merchant’s “firm offer”
- sale of goods
- merchant seller
- in writing and signed by merchant
- words of firmness (promise to keep the offer open) included in writing
- if no time is stated, offer irrevocable for a reasonable time, up to 3 months
90 days = max time offer open
Output contract
Under the UCC, a contract to sell all of one’s output is valid even though an exact quantity is not stated in the contract
(Output or requirements contract is considered a sufficiently precise quantity)
Under UCC, risk of loss depends on:
Delivery term
Not: title/ ownership
What is a firm offer?
An offer that must remain open despite the absence of consideration
(Can only be made my merchants and must be in a signed writing)
(If doesn’t state it’s period of removability, must remain open for a reasonable time, not to exceed 3 months)
Warranty of title (under the UCC Sales Article)
Provides that the seller deliver the goods free from any lien of which the buyer lacked knowledge when the contract was made.
(Can be disclaimed by specific language or circumstance(judicial sale))
*auto arises in every sale of goods (need not be in writing, seller need not be a merchant)
Action for strict product liability
- sold the product in a defective condition
- seller in the business of selling goods dealer
- dangerous - defect caused the plaintiff’s injury
- (product expected to and did reach consumer without substantial change)
- injured person need NOT be in privity**
- seller’s actions / intent do NOT matter*** (seller need not have failed to exercise due care; liability is strict and imposed on even a careful seller)
- *strict products liability extends to all foreseeable users ( privity not required)
- seller need NOT have been aware of the defect
Most important in determining who bears risk of loss in sale of goods contract:
Contract’s shipping terms
FOB place of shipment contract, risk of loss passes to buyer when the goods are:
Delivered to the carrier **
On anticipatory breach of contract (or repudiation), the nonbreaching party may:
- demand assurances of performance
- cancel the contract
*no right to punitive damages under contract law in general
Seller’s obligation to buyer (unless otherwise agreed to) is to:
Hold conforming goods and give buyer whatever notification is reasonably necessary to enable the buyer to take delivery
Liquidated Damages
An injured party can’t necessarily collect any amount of liquidated damages specified in a contract: must not be penalty and must be reasonable amount.
*seller may retain up to $500 of the buyer’s deposit on the buyer’s breach (even if no provision for liquidated damages in the contract)