Contracts MEE Rule Statements Flashcards
Common law applies to
contracts for services or real estate
Article 2 of UCC applies to
contracts for the sale of goods
If a transaction includes both goods and services, what test is applied?
The predominant purpose test is applied to resolve whether the common law or the UCC applies to the entire transaction
Under common law, if the breach is minor
the breaching party has substantially performed and the non-breaching party must still perform under the contract.
Under common law minor breach, who can recover on the contract?
A party who substantially performs can recover on the contract even though they have not rendered full performance.
What can the substantially performing party recover under common law if it’s a minor breach?
Contract price minus cost to the other party of obtaining promised full performance.
A material breach occurs
when the non-breaching party does not receive the substantial benefit of the bargain
A material breach allows the non-breaching party to
withhold any promised performance and pursue remedies for the breach, including damages.
Under material breach, the breaching party who failed to substantially perform generally cannot:
recover damages, but may be able to recover through restitution.
Recovery in restitution is generally only available if
the breach was not will full
A party who intentionally furnishes services that are materially different than what was promised cannot
recover anything in restitution unless the non-breaching party has accepted or agreed to accept the substitute performance
in construction contracts, the general measure of damages for a contractor’s failure is
the difference between the contract price and the cost of construction by another builder, plus any progress payments made to the breaching builder and compensation for delay in completion of the construction.
When a breach results in a defective or unfinished construction, if the award of damages based on the cost to fix or complete the construction would result in economic waste, the court may
award damages equal to the diminution in the market price caused by the breach
Economic waste occurs
when the cost to fix or complete the construction is clearly disproportional to any economic benefit or utility gained as a result
compensatory damages are meant to
compensate the non-breaching party for actual economic losses
expectation damages are intended to
put the non-breaching party in the same position as if the contract had been performed.
expectation damages must be calculated with
reasonable certainty
In construction contracts, the general measure of damages for a contractor’s failure to begin or complete a building project is the
difference between the contract price and the cost of construction by another builder, plus any progress payments made to the breaching builder and compensation for the delay in completing the construction.
Actual damages can be either
direct or consequential
Consequential damages are
a direct result of the breach but need not be the usual result of the breaching party’s conduct
Consequential damages must be
reasonably foreseeable result of the breach given the parties’ specific circumstances
damages are foreseeable if they were
a natural and probable consequence of breach, if they were in the contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was made, or if they were otherwise foreseeable.
there must be a causal link between the breach and the
consequential damages for them to be recoverable.
the plaintiff must prove the dollar amount of consequential damages
with reasonable certainty