Contracts MBE Flashcards
Revocation of an offer: An offer can be revoked
before acceptance unless it is falls into one of the
FOUR categories: also Mnemonic: FOUR
Firm Offer
Option Contracts
Unilateral Contracts
Reasonably foreseeable reliance on the offer
Creation of an offer
There must be intent to enter into a contract plus specific terms (e.g., price, quantity, and identity of the parties). And, it must be communicated to the offeree creating the power of acceptance
Note: A requirement or output contract will not fail for lack of _________. otherwise what is required?
quantity
The amount sold or requested must be in good faith and not unreasonably disproportionate to a stated estimate or prior comparable output.
Termination of an offer
There are four ways to terminate an offer:
(1) Lapse of time: an offer lapses after a reasonable time.
(2) Rejection (including counteroffer, which is a rejection and a new offer)
(3) Revocation of an offer: An offer can be revoked
before acceptance unless it is falls into one of the (FOUR) categories:
(4) Death or incapacity of offeror
Bilateral contracts are accepted by
a promise to perform or beginning performance.
Unilateral contracts (rewards, prizes, or offers that specify they are unilateral) can only be accepted by
full performance.
Tip: most contracts are bilateral.
Article 2: An offer for the sale of goods is accepted by
promising to ship or shipping the goods.
If the seller ships defective goods with an accommodation letter, that constitutes a __________
If there is no letter, it is both an _________ and a _______.
counter offer
both an acceptance and a breach
Acceptance under the Mailbox rule is effective: acceptance is effective when
sent or dispatched (the mailbox rule).
As an exception to the mailbox rule, in an option contract acceptance effective upon ________.
or if a rejection then an acceptance is mailed, the one
receipt.
the one received first controls
The mirror image rule
Common law: the acceptance must be the “mirror image” of the offer.
UCC: An acceptance does not need to mirror the offer and may have additional or different terms. Between merchants, an additional term will be a part of the contract unless:
Knock out rule majority
it materially alters it, the offeror objects within a reasonable time, or the offer limits acceptance to the terms of the offer.
Under the majority rule, a different term is knocked out and replaced with gap fillers.
The following are not consideration:
NOT consideration:
a promise to make a gift,
a moral obligation,
past consideration, or
an illusory promise.
Reliance is a substitute for__________. if there is a promise and foreseeable and justifiable reliance, enforcement will be granted as necessary to avoid injustice.
consideration
Under the common law, Consideration is needed to modify a contract. The performance of a preexisting legal duty is not consideration unless it falls into an exception. eg of exceptions
Under the UCC: only good faith is needed to modify a contract.
(e.g., unforeseen difficulty,
a good faith settlement of a lawsuit,
a good faith payment in full of a due and disputed debt,
a written promise to pay a time-barred debt, or
if the duty was owed to a third person).
performance under the common law:
• Exception: Express condition (e.g., “I will buy it if I like it” or “I will buy it if I can get a 10% interest rate”). These must be complied with exactly. Tip: courts find that most conditions are “constructive” and substantial performance is enough.
Common law: one has to substantially perform one’s duties in order for the other party’s duty to arise.
UCC: The seller must provide perfect tender of the goods (or the buyer can reject the goods).
If the seller does not provide perfect tender and the buyer rejects the goods, the seller only has an automatic right to cure if
(1) there is time left to perform under the contract, or
(2) the seller reasonably believed that the buyer would accept the nonconforming goods with or without a money allowance such as a discount (e.g., the seller sent better goods than contracted for).
Installment contract: The buyer may reject an installment if there is a
“substantial impairment” and
the seller cannot cure the installment.
Note on revocation: If the buyer accepts goods, he may not reject them. However, he may later revoke his acceptance. However, Revocation is a higher standard than rejection as it requires showing that the defect:
defect substantially impairs the value of the goods to him, among other things.
Carrier cases: Most contracts are shipment contracts (e.g., the contract is silent or has shipping terms such as “FOB Seller’s Place of Business,” “CIF,” “C&F,” or “FAS”). The seller only has to get the goods to the shipper and the risk of loss (ROL)
For destination contracts (e.g., contracts that state, “FOB Buyer’s Place of Business” or “Ex-Ship”), the seller has to get the goods to the destination.
passes to the buyer at that point.
• Non-carrier cases: If the seller is a merchant, the seller what must the seller do for the ROL to pass to the buyer?
If the seller is not a merchant, the seller must tender delivery (make the goods available) for the ROL to pass.
seller must actually: deliver the goods to the buyer for the ROL to pass.
• Breach: if the seller is in breach, who bears the ROL and until when?
Breach: if the seller is in breach, the ROL is on the seller until the defective goods are cured by the seller or accepted by the buyer.
Excusing performance and conditions: A party is excused from performing if
the other party breaches.
An anticipatory repudiation occurs when a party unequivocally breaches. If this occurs, the other party can?
sue immediately, suspend performance and wait to sue, treat the contract as discharged, or urge the other party to perform.
A prospective inability to perform is when a party has reasonable grounds for insecurity that the other will not perform. The insecure party can
demand adequate assurances that performance will take place.
Note that conditions can also be waived.
Discharging duties: A duty can be discharged by:
Occurrence of a condition subsequent
Agreement
Frustration of purpose
impossibility
Discharging a duty:
Occurrence of a condition subsequent
• Occurrence of a condition subsequent: This is a condition that cuts off a duty. (E.g., “I will paint the house until it starts to rain.” The rain is a condition subsequent that cuts off the duty to
paint the house.)
Discharging a duty:
Agreement
• Agreement: examples include novation (a new party steps into the shoes of an existing party), modification, release, accord and satisfaction (the parties agree to new or different consideration), and rescission (the contract is undone).
Discharging duty:
Frustration of purpose
• Frustration of purpose: the primary purpose of the contract known by both parties at the time of contracting is substantially frustrated by an unforeseeable event that occurred
after the contract was entered into.
Discharging duty:
Impossibility
• Impossibility: an event that renders performance impossible occurs after the contract was made, it was not reasonably foreseeable at the time of the contract, the nonoccurrence was a basic assumption of the parties, neither party is at fault, and neither party bears the risk.
Express warranties
Express warranties are affirmations of fact about the goods or a sample of the goods. These cannot be disclaimed. Mere “puffery” does not create an express warranty.
The implied warranty of merchantability
The implied warranty of merchantability is made by a merchant and warrants that goods are fit for their ordinary purpose. This warranty can be disclaimed (e.g., by express language such as a conspicuous “as is” clause or through conduct).
The implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
The implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose can be made by any seller who knows of the buyer’s specific purpose and the buyer relies on the seller. It can be disclaimed.
Tip: the seller does not have to be a merchant.