Contracts (Formation of K's) Flashcards
An offer is…
An objective manifestation of a present intent to contract
Advertisements are…
generally not offers, unless highly specific as to quantity and clearly indicate who may accept
NOTE it is NOT exclusive to newspapers!! It can be a notice of a competition for a school offering a first-place award, etc.
An offer may be TERMINATED by
-Death or insanity of either party
-Indirect revocation (learning of someone else about destruction of K)
-Express rejection
-Counteroffer
An offer may be REVOKED by
- Lapse of reasonable time
-Unambiguous statement by the offeror to the offeree
-Offeree becomes aware of offeror’s unambiguous conduct or statement indicating an unwillingness or inability to contract
Mailbox Rule for OFFER
effective upon RECEIPT by the offeree
- Rejections and counteroffers are also effective upon receipt by offeree’s physical possession
Mailbox Rule for acceptance
Effective upon DISPATCH/WHEN SENT
Exception to Mailbox Rule is…
If offeree sends a rejection FOLLOWED by an acceptance, first to arrive/first to receive controls
Mailbox Rule and Option K’s
the mailbox rule DOES NOT apply to option contracts.
An acceptance under an option contract is EFFECTIVE UPON RECEIPT.
UCC Acceptance—two issues often arise: (Battle of the Forms)
Acceptance with additional terms—are both parties merchants?
Yes?—K is formed with additional terms UNLESS either: (“MELO”)
a) Additional terms Materially change the offer,
b) Offer Expressly Limits acceptance to the offer’s terms, c) Offeror Objects within a reasonable time
No?—K is formed, but without additional terms
“Knockout Rule” - in a contract between merchants for the sale of goods, if the acceptance DOES NOT match the terms of the offer-
Additional terms that do not materially alter the original terms of the offer will be included in the contract, but different terms may be KNOCKED OUT of the contract.
Consideration-
is a bargained for exchange for value;
- consideration will not be invalidated because of the amount (ex. I can sell my house to you for a dollar)
- “ a peppercorn will suffice!”
An Illusory Promise is-
when the party making the offer retains control (ex. I will sell you my car whenever I feel like it” or “If I want to”)
-Modern trend:
A promise to give a gift
is INVALID consideration (ex. grandma calls son and says I promise to give you $100 to boy, then changes her mind.. this is ok)
Past or Moral consideration…
is NOT consideration
-(ex. Little John is drowning in the ocean and Carlos saves Little John. Mr. John says “phew, thank you for saving my son’s life! Come to my house and I will give you $10k”. Next day, Mr. John only gives $10.)
- This is fine, and Mr. John doesnt need to give anything!
A promise to pay a debt that was barred by SOL is-
Valid consideration.
- (ex. If i promise to pay you a debt even though its been barred by SOL can still be enforced)
A promise to pay a debt that has been discharged by bankruptcy-
is valid and enforceable consideration
If I have the right to sue you, but I give up the right to sue, it is-
Valid consideration
The forbearance to sue/giving up the right to sue is…
valid consideration
Promissory Estoppel occurs when
a promise is made and one relies to their detriment on that promise
Accord and Satisfaction occurs when-
parties to an existing K agree to accept different performance in satisfaction of the original, existing obligation
-ex. If I owe you $100, but agree to $75 and send the $75, the deal is $75. Think of debt collectors agreeing to a lower debt/negotiating on different amounts
- Ex. Resolving a good-faith dispute… if you agree to a new deal after debating/questioning the debt in good-faith, that new figure is acceptable and enforceable
Partial payment of an original debt will satisfy as an…
Accord and Satisfaction if there is a bona fide dispute about the validity of the claim
A promise to settle a claim may be-
valid consideration to support a return promise so long as
there is a good faith dispute over the validity of the claim.
Under the pre-existing duty rule in the common law-
a promise to perform a pre-existing duty or obligation generally does not constitute consideration
A bilateral contract is a-
Promise for a promise; exchange of mutual promises
-E.g., A offers to sell his car to B for $5,000 and B promises to purchase A’s car at that price
A unilateral contract is a-
Promise for an act/performance
- E.g., A promises to pay B $100 if B paints A’s fence; B is not obligated to paint A’s fence, but if B does, K is formed and A must pay B $100
A quasi-contract is
not a K, but rather a restitution remedy designed to prevent unjust enrichment;
Think of a haircut– barber gives you haircut, he expects to be paid (implied-in-fact K)
Look for:
-P has conferred a benefit to D;
-P reasonably expects to be paid;
-D knowingly accepted the benefit; and
-D will be unjustly enriched if P is not compensated
An Implied-in-law K occurs when-
-the plaintiff has conferred a measurable benefit (eg, medical services) on the defendant
- the plaintiff acted without gratuitous intent
- it would be unfair to let the defendant retain the benefit without compensating the plaintiff.