Contracts-Contracts Content & Meaning Flashcards
Parol Evidence Rule (PER)
PER limits the extent to which evidence of discussions or writings made prior to or contemporaneous with the signed written K can be admitted and considered as part of the agreement.
Partial vs Total Integration
Partial Integration: is one intended to be the final expression of the agreement, but NOT intended to include all details of the parties’ agreement. PER does NOT allowed the extrinsic evidence to contradict/materially alter but DOES allow it to SUPPLEMENT a term in a partially integrated K.
Total Integration: is the final expression of the agreement, and is also intended to include all details of the agreement. PER does NOT allow extrinsic term in a totally integrated K.
Intent of the Parties used to determine integration
Common law - four-corners rule: look within the “four corners” of the document for evidence of intent. Merger clause = complete/total integration
R2d rule: if, under the circumstances, an extrinsic term of an agreement would “naturally be omitted” from a writing, then that term can be introduced, so long as it does not contradict the writing.
UCC rule: presumes that a written K = partial integration & allows additional consistent terms unless a ct concludes that the parties “certainly” would have included the term in the written K.
PER Exceptions (when will PER not apply?)
- K formation OR enforcement defect/defense (e.g., fraud, mistake, duress, etc.)
- Conditions precedent to the K’s effectiveness
- Interpreting an ambiguity (incl. course of performance, course of dealing, and usage of trade)
- Separate or subsequent agreements