Contracts and Sales Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Rights of 3rd Party Beneficiaries

A

Generally, only an intended 3rd party beneficiary has a right to bring an action on the contract. His rights vest when

  1. he detrimentally relies on the rights created
  2. manifests assent to the contract at one parties’ request; OR
  3. files a lawsuit to enforce the contract.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assignment, Delegation, Novation

A
  • Assignment is the transfer of right

An assignee takes all the rights or the assignor subject to any defenses

Assignments are not allowed when doing so materially increases the duty or risk of the obligor or materially reduces the beneficiary’s chance of obtaining performance

  • Delegation is the transfer of duties

When obligation are delegated the delegator is not released from liability and recovery can be had against the delegator if the delegatee does not perform

  • Novation is the substitutino fo a new K for an old one and the original obligor is released from his promises under the original agreement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Resale of Non-conforming goods

A

The UCC provides that upon tender of nonconforming goods, a buyer must retain possession of the rejected goods for a reasonable period of time to allow the seller to reclaim them. In the absence of other instructions from the seller, the buyer may store nonconforming goods at the seller’s expense, reship them to the seller, or sell them for the seller’s account in a commercially reasonable manner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mailbox Rule

A
  • Acceptance valid on sending
  • Rejection valid on receipt
  • A then R, A controls unless relied on R.
  • R then A, first to be recieved by the offeror will prevail.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Statute of Frauds

A

Unenforceable unless evidence by a writing including the essential elements and signed by defendant party. Applies to: [Mr. SOUR]

  • marriage
  • suretyship
  • one year (cannot be performed within a year)
  • UCC contracts over $500
  • real property

Modifications, if the contract as modified falls under SoF, must also be in writing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Common law v UCC

A

Art. 2 of UCC will apply whnever the transaction is a sale of goods, otherwise use common law. When a transaction involves both goods and services use the predominant purpose test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a K

A

Mutual Assent (Offer and Acceptance) + Consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Termination of Offers

A
  • Lapse of time (reasonable time unless stated)
  • Death or mental incapacity of the offeror
  • Destruction of subject matter
  • Offer becomes illegal
  • Revocation which is limited by
    • Option K
    • Promissory estoppel
    • Partial performance
    • UCC firm offer rule
      • mercant
      • to remain open
      • in writing assurance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Battle of the Forms

A

When both parties in the sale of goods are merchants and acceptance was made by means of a form that included additional terms.

  • Last shot rule
    • additional term is included unless,
      • ther term materially alters
      • Offer expressly limits acceptance
      • Offeror has laready objected to the additional terms, or objects within a reasonable time

if any of these 3 are met a K is formed but original terms hold

  • Different terms
    • some jurisdictions treat different terms the same as additional terms above
    • most use knock-out rule where different terms are nullified and you use gap fillers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Promises binding without consideration

A
  • Promise to pay a debt barred by the statute of limitations
  • promise to perfrom a voidable duty
  • promise to pay benefits received
  • promissory estoppel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defenses to formation

A
  • Mistake
  • Misunderstanding
  • Misrepresenation, nondisclosure, and fraud
  • Undue influence
  • Fraud
  • Lack of capacity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Defenses to enforcement

A
  • Illegality
  • Unconscionability
  • PP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Implied-in-Fact Ks

A

When words express the intent of the parties, the K is an express K.

When conduct indicates assent or agreement, the agreement is considered implied in fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Implied-in-law (quasi) K

A
  • P confers a measurable benefit on the D
  • P reasonably expected to get paid
  • It would be unfair to let D keep benefit without paying P
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Warranties

A
  • Express Warranty
    • Any promise, affirmation, description, or sample that is part of the basis of the bargain unless it is merely the seller’s opinion
  • Implied Warranty of Merchantability
    • When seller is a merchant goods must be fit for their ordinary purpose
  • Implie Warranty of Fitness for a particular purpose
    • Applies when the seller has reason to know that the buyer has a particular use for the goods, and the buyer is relying upon the seller’s skill to select the goods.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Discharge

A
  • Impracticability
  • Frustration of purpose - unexpected events arise that destory one party’s purpose for K
  • Recission
  • Release
  • Destruction or Injurty to identifed goods
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

3rd parties

A
  • 2nd restatement says 3rd party can recover if she ia an intended beneficiary.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Types of Ks within Statute of Frauds

A
  • Marriage
  • Suretyship
  • One year
  • UCC over $500
  • Real property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Parol Evidence Rule

A
  • determine whether parties writing is completely integrated or partially
    • Complete - inadmissable to contradict or supplement
    • partial - inadmissible to contradict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Remedies at common law

A
  • Expection damages - put the injured party in the same position as if the K had been performed.
  • Consequential damages - reasonably forseeable losses to a nonbreaching party that go beyond expecation damages, such as loss profits
  • Liquidated damages and penalties
  • Restituonary - seeks to restore a party the benefit conferred on the oether party
  • reliance - based on the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the non-breaching party
  • Specific performance - watch for land or unique goods
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Does the right to choose alternatives in contract formation make a promise illusory?

A

A promise is not illusory even if it offers the option for the promisee to choose the means of performance, as long as none of the options are illusory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How does detrimental reliance relate to promissory estoppel?

A

To determine whether promissory estoppel is a viable theory of recovery in circumstances of inadequate consideration, look to see whether one party relied on the other to his or her detriment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Requirements for K modifications under the UCC

A

No need for consideration just good faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Can a pre-existing legal duty serve as consideration?

A

A pre-existing duty is not adequate condideration. Exceptions:

  • New or different consideration
  • Ratification
  • Duty that is owed to a third person instead of the promisee
  • Duty is disputed
  • Unforeseen circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Substitutes for consideration

A

Promissory estoppel

good faith under UCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Elements of Promissory Estoppel

A
  1. Promisor could reasonably expect his promise to induce action or forbearance
  2. The action induced is definite and substantial
  3. The action is in fact induced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Condition precedent

A

A condition precedent is something that must occur before performance is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Concurrent conditions

A

Concurrent conditions are those that occur at same time. If one condition has happened, the other is due.

29
Q

condition subsequent

A

Performance cuts off the preceding duty, which leaves no remaining duty to perform.

30
Q

Contractual conditions may be excused by:

A

FAP SAW DI

  • Failure to cooperate: One party prevents a condition from happening
  • Actual breach: Excuses the conditions for the non-breaching party
  • Prospective inability to perform: If it is reasonable to believe one party won’t perform, the condition is excused
  • Substantial performance: One party commits a minor breach, but most of the job is done
  • Anticipatory repudiation: An unequivocal statement that one party will not be able to perform excuses conditions on both sides
  • Waiver or Estoppel: One party communicates to the other that the condition is not essential and he will not demand it
  • Divisibility of contract: If the contract is easily divisible, one party can perform some units and not others
  • Impossibility, impracticability, or frustration of purpose
31
Q

What is the difference between conditions precedent and conditions subsequent with respect to burden and pleading?

A
  • If there is a condition precedent, the plaintiff has the burden to plead and prove the condition precedent because her claim is that the defendant has a duty to perform
  • If there is a condition subsequent, the defendant must plead and prove the condition because his claim is that his duty has been terminated
32
Q

When does a third party beneficiary have enforceable rights

A

When she:

  • Knows about the benefit
  • Relies on the benefit
  • Brings a suit to enforce the contract
33
Q

What rights does a third party beneficiary have against a promisee?

A

A third party beneficiary may sue on a contract where his right have vested if he is a creditor of the promisee. A donee third party beneficiary has no right to sue unless there is detrimental reliance.

34
Q

What is an intended third party beneficiary?

A

An intended third party beneficiary is a party who:

  1. Has contractual rights (once vested)
  2. Has contractual rights that are identified in the contract
  3. Receives performance directly
  4. Has a relationship with promisee
35
Q

When is an assignment of contract rights permissible? What does an assignment create?

A
  • All contract rights are assignable as long as the assignment does not substantially change the duties or risks to the non-assigning party
  • Assignments are revocable without consideration but irrevocable with consideration
  • An assignment creates privity of contract between the obligor and the assignee and cuts off privity between the obligor and the assignor
36
Q

How is a Non-Assignment Clause generally construed?

A

Any clause barring assignment of a contract will be construed very narrowly. The clause typically will be construed to bar only assignment of the assignor’s duties. With such a clause, the affected party has the right to sue for damages, if any; however, the assignment will generally still be allowed. A contract prohibiting all assignments is void.

37
Q

What remedies are available for breach of contract?

A
  • Damages
  • Specific performance
  • Rescission
  • Restitution
  • Quasi-contractual relief
38
Q

What do compensatory contract damages do?

A

Compensatory damages put the non-breaching party in as good of a position as that party would have been in had the contract been upheld.

39
Q

When are nominal contract damages awarded?

A

Nominal damages may be awarded if there is a breach but no actual damages.

40
Q

Expectation damages are what type of damages?

A

Expectation damages are considered compensatory damages.

41
Q

Reliance damages are:

A

Reliance damages are compensatory damages in the amount of the loss resulting from the non-breaching party’s reliance on contract.

42
Q

Consequential damages are:

A

Consequential damages are awarded in addition to compensatory damages if a reasonable person would have foreseen at the time the contract was entered into that such damages would be possible.

43
Q

When will specific performance be awarded?

A

Specific performance will be awarded upon a showing that:

  1. The contract contains certain and definite terms
  2. All the non-breaching party’s conditions have been satisfied or are ready and able to be performed
  3. Damages would be inadequate
  4. Both parties are capable of performance
  5. Specific performance is feasible and enforceable
  6. The breaching party has no valid defenses

Note: Specific performance is for land or unique goods, not for services (because requiring specific performance on a services contract amounts to indentured servitude).

44
Q

What is the effect of an award of restitution?

A

An award of restitution allows the non-breaching party to recover the benefit conferred to the breaching party to prevent unjust enrichment.

45
Q

What is replevin?

A

a lawsuit that enables a person to get back personal property taken wrongfully or unlawfully and get compensation for resulting losses.

46
Q

What damages are available to the buyer under a U.C.C. contract?

A

Market price/Cost of replacement goods minus the contract price = The buyer’s damages.

47
Q

What are a seller’s remedies under a U.C.C. contract?

A

The seller has the right to withhold goods for nonpayment by the buyer or the right to reclaim goods sold on credit if the buyer turns out to be insolvent.

48
Q

What damages are available to a seller under a U.C.C. contract?

A

Market price minus the contract price or the contract price minus the resale price or the contract price minus lost profits.

49
Q

When does a third party beneficiary’s rights vest?

A

A beneficiary’s rights vest (and at that point, an intended beneficiary can enforce them) when the beneficiary:

  • Assents to the promise
  • Initiates a lawsuit to enforce the contract
  • Changes his position in a significant manner in reliance on the contract
50
Q

In what circumstances may a promisee sue a promisor when performance is not rendered to a third party beneficiary?

A
  • If the third party beneficiary was a creditor: The promisee may recover damages against the promisor if he already paid the third-party beneficiary, and he may compel specific performance if he has not paid the debt yet
  • If the third party beneficiary was a donee: The majority view allows the promisee to recover nominal damages or compel specific performance
51
Q

Which assignee prevails when there are successive assigments?

A

Revocable assignments may be revoked by subsequent assignments; however, irrevocable assignments may only be revoked in limited circumstances: The subsequent assignee provided consideration and did not receive notice and one of the following occurs:

  • A later assignee obtained the first judgment against the obligor
  • A later assignee received the first payment of a claim from the obligor
  • A later assignee received delivery of a token chose
  • A later assignee enters into a novation
  • An estoppel theory applies
52
Q

How can a revocable assignment of rights be revoked?

A
  • Death of the assignor
  • Bankruptcy of the assignor
  • Notice of revocation
  • Assignor’s acceptance of performance from the obligor
  • Later assignment
53
Q

What are the assignee’s rights against the obligor, and what are the obligor’s defenses?

A

The assignee may directly enforce her rights against the obligor, who may raise against the assignee any defenses that he can assert against the promissee, unless:

  • It is a personal defense arising after the assignment
  • Estoppel prevents the obligor from asserting the defense
54
Q

What are the rigths and liabilities of the delegate?

A

If there is only delegation, the delegate has the power to perform the delegator’s duty but cannot be compelled to perform. If there is a delegation and assumption, where the delegate promises to perform in exchange for consideration, the obligee is also a third party beneficiary who can compel the delegate to perform or bring suit for non-performance.

55
Q

When does a seller make an implied warranty?

A
  • When a merchant deals in a certain type of goods, there is an implied warranty of merchantibility, warranting that the goods are generally fit for the ordinary purposes for which those goods are used
  • An implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose arises when a seller knows or has reason to know the purpose for which the goods are required and that the buyer is relying on the seller’s skill to provide them
56
Q

What are the defenses for breach of an implied warranty?

A
  • Assumption of risk by using the product while knowing of the breach
  • Contributory negligence by acting unreasonably after discovering the defect
  • Comparative negligence
  • Notice of the breach, which requires that the buyer give the seller notice within a reasonable time after the consumer knew or should have known that the product was not in compliance with the warranty
57
Q

When does a claim for breach of an express warranty arise?

A

A claim for breach of an express warranty arises when a seller makes an affirmation of fact or promise to the buyer about the goods that becomes part of the “basis of the bargain” and that promise is breached, regardless of whether the seller was at fault.

58
Q

Can past consideration be effective?

A

If the exchange of value occurred in the past, it cannot suffice as consideration for a present promise. For example, A paints B’s house, B promises to pay after the painting is complete. There is no valid contract.

59
Q

Is there consideration for a gift?

A

There is no consideration for a gift because it is gratuitous.

60
Q

What is an illusory promise and does it constitute consideration?

A

Consideration must be mutual, meaning that both parties must exchange something. If one party is not actually required to perform or do something, then the promise is illusory and consideration does not exist on both sides of the agreement. If there is no consideration there is no contract.

61
Q

Does the right to choose alternatives in contract formation make a promise illusory?

A

A promise is not illusory even if it offers the option for the promisee to choose the means of performance, as long as none of the options are illusory.

62
Q

How does detrimental reliance relate to promissory estoppel?

A

To determine whether promissory estoppel is a viable theory of recovery in circumstances of inadequate consideration, look to see whether one party relied on the other to his or her detriment.

63
Q

When can consideration for past performance be effective?

A

Consideration for past performance is effective when:

  • A technical defense rendered a previous obligation unenforceable but a new promise is made in writing or has been partially performed
  • The promisor requested the promisee to perform and the promise involves paying for the past act requested by the promisor
64
Q

When will courts inquire into the adequacy of the consideration?

A

Generally, courts will not evaluate thr sufficiency of consideration, but courts of equity may deny an equitable remedy if they find the contract unconscionable, such as where consideration is a token (no value), and where there is sham consideration (insignificant sum that may not be actually paid).

65
Q

Is there consideration in requirement and output contracts?

A

Yes, there is consideration in requirement and output contracts. The buyer incurs the legal detriment of relinquishing his legal right to buy goods he may need from alternate sources and the seller relinquishes the right to sell goods she may manufacture to another buyer.

66
Q

Are conditional promises enforceable?

A

Yes, regardless of how unlikely the contingency is. Conditions that are completely within the promisor’s control, however, may be deemed illusory, rendering a contract unenforceable.

67
Q

Does the right to cancel or withdraw render a contract invalid due to lack of consideration?

A

An unqualified right to cancel may render a promise illusory for lack of consideration, but if that right is restricted in any way, consideration will be deemed valid.

68
Q

What is consideration?

A

Consideration is bargained for exchange of legal value. Consideration can be a promise for a promise or a promise for an act. Courts will not question the adequacy of consideration unless it is totally valueless.