Contracts - 1.7 - Terms Flashcards
Contract formation requires
Offer & Acceptance
Consideration
ICLR
Capacity
Ways in which an otherwise good contract might be voided
Duress and undue influence
The content of a contract
Means the terms and interpretation of contracts
Express Terms
Terms communicated between the parties
Implied Terms
Terms that have not been communicated between the parties, but the law assumes or decides they exist.
Statements made by parties during negotiations may be divided into three groups
1) Mere puffs - no legal significance
2) Representations - statements not intended to be binding
3) Statements of fact - intended on being binding
When does the distinction between representations and terms matter?
- The statement turns out to be untrue
- Promise is not fulfilled
Is there a remedy in law for misrepresentation?
Yes
The difference between a representation and a term
Only a Term is binding
How do Courts ascertain if parties intend to be bound by a statement made by one of them?
An objective test
What would a reasonable person understand to be the intention of the parties having regard to all circumstances
What is taken into account when ascertaining whether a statement is binding?
- The importance of the statement
- The timing of the statement
- The reduction of the contract into writing
- Special knowledge/skill of person making statement
- Assumption of responsibility
The importance of the statement
- Regarded a Term if it can be shown that the injured party would not have entered into the contract but for that statement.
Bannerman v White 1861
The Terms of a contract are….
- It’s contents
- They define rights and obligations
Express terms
Statements made by the parties, by which they intend to be bound.
A contract can have terms agreed in writing, or agreed orally, or a mixture of the two.
Implied Terms
Not formed by statements made by the parties.
They have not been agreed
upon, orally or in writing.
The law deems that they exist.
Mere Puff
Statements of no legal significance.
Representations
Statements of fact or law which induce the making of the contract which the parties do not intend to be binding.
Terms
Statements of fact which the parties intend to be binding.
Why does distinction between representations and terms matter?
- When a statement is not true
- May amount to a breach of contract, leading to remedies or damages
- Misrepresentation is not a breach, but may be able to obtain a remedy in law.
Can a statement be both a term and a representation
YES
This would give rise to an action for both breach of contract and misrepresentation
What is the objective test for whether parties intended to be bound by a statement?
‘what would a reasonable person understand to be the intention of the parties, having regard to all the
circumstances?’
Where a statement is made during negotiations for the purpose of inducing the other party to enter a binding contract,
There is ground for inferring the statement was intended to be binding.
The inference can be rebutted if the party if it can be shown that it is not reasonable to hold them bound to it
The importance of the statement
Statement may be regarded as a term, if it can be shown it was so important that the counterparty would not have entered into the contract but for that statement
- Bannerman v White
Bannerman v White
- Purchase of hops
- Not interested if they are treated with sulphur
- Held that the statement was a term of the contract