Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Public 1 and Contract > Contracts - 1.7 - Terms > Flashcards

Contracts - 1.7 - Terms Flashcards

1
Q

Contract formation requires

A

Offer & Acceptance
Consideration
ICLR
Capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ways in which an otherwise good contract might be voided

A

Duress and undue influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The content of a contract

A

Means the terms and interpretation of contracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Express Terms

A

Terms communicated between the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Implied Terms

A

Terms that have not been communicated between the parties, but the law assumes or decides they exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Statements made by parties during negotiations may be divided into three groups

A

1) Mere puffs - no legal significance
2) Representations - statements not intended to be binding
3) Statements of fact - intended on being binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When does the distinction between representations and terms matter?

A
  • The statement turns out to be untrue
  • Promise is not fulfilled
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is there a remedy in law for misrepresentation?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The difference between a representation and a term

A

Only a Term is binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do Courts ascertain if parties intend to be bound by a statement made by one of them?

A

An objective test
What would a reasonable person understand to be the intention of the parties having regard to all circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is taken into account when ascertaining whether a statement is binding?

A
  • The importance of the statement
  • The timing of the statement
  • The reduction of the contract into writing
  • Special knowledge/skill of person making statement
  • Assumption of responsibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The importance of the statement

A
  • Regarded a Term if it can be shown that the injured party would not have entered into the contract but for that statement.

Bannerman v White 1861

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The Terms of a contract are….

A
  • It’s contents
  • They define rights and obligations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Express terms

A

Statements made by the parties, by which they intend to be bound.
A contract can have terms agreed in writing, or agreed orally, or a mixture of the two.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Implied Terms

A

Not formed by statements made by the parties.
They have not been agreed
upon, orally or in writing.
The law deems that they exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mere Puff

A

Statements of no legal significance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Representations

A

Statements of fact or law which induce the making of the contract which the parties do not intend to be binding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Terms

A

Statements of fact which the parties intend to be binding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Why does distinction between representations and terms matter?

A
  • When a statement is not true
  • May amount to a breach of contract, leading to remedies or damages
  • Misrepresentation is not a breach, but may be able to obtain a remedy in law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Can a statement be both a term and a representation

A

YES
This would give rise to an action for both breach of contract and misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the objective test for whether parties intended to be bound by a statement?

A

‘what would a reasonable person understand to be the intention of the parties, having regard to all the
circumstances?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Where a statement is made during negotiations for the purpose of inducing the other party to enter a binding contract,

A

There is ground for inferring the statement was intended to be binding.

The inference can be rebutted if the party if it can be shown that it is not reasonable to hold them bound to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

The importance of the statement

A

Statement may be regarded as a term, if it can be shown it was so important that the counterparty would not have entered into the contract but for that statement

  • Bannerman v White
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Bannerman v White

A
  • Purchase of hops
  • Not interested if they are treated with sulphur
  • Held that the statement was a term of the contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Timing

A
  • If the statement was made at the time of contracting, it’s more likely to a term than if at an early stage

Routledge v McKay, 1954

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Routledge v McKay [1954]

A
  • Private seller of motorcycle
  • Told the buyer it was a 1941 or 1942 model
  • Entered into sale, did not mention the year of the model
  • CoA held that the time lapsed meant the statement was a representation and not a term of contract.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Reduction of the contract into writing

A
  • Court influenced by the fact contract reduced into writing.
  • Inference drawn is that the statement could not have been regarded as significant
  • Court concluded the statement was never intended to be a term

eg Routledge v McKay: Motorcycles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Special knowledge or skill

A

When one party had exclusive access to info or special knowledge this is likely to be taken into the other’s favour.

Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams vs Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams

A
  • Age of car wrong (1939 rather than 1948)
  • The skill and expertise lay in the hands of the car dealer
  • Consequently age of the car was a representation rather than a term
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors)

A
  • Told consumer that car had done 20,000 miles
  • After changing the engine and gearbox it was clear that the car had done more miles
  • Court of Appeal held the mileage was a term.
    Harold should have known better
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Assumption of Responsibility

A

A statement may become a term of the contract where the vendor expressly accepts the responsibility for soundness of the sale item in question.

Schawel v Reade 1913

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Schawel v Reade 1913

A
  • Horse for stud purposes
  • Tried to examine stud horse, was told the horse was sound in every way.
  • At the time of sale was the horse represented as fit for stud purposes?
  • Did the purchaser act on that to but the horse?
  • Strength of statement dissuaded plaintiff from making checks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Ecay v Godfrey (1947)

A
  • Seller of a boat stated it was sound but advised the buyer to have it surveyed
  • Buyer did not intend that his statement should be taken as a term of the contract.
  • Onus of verification on purchaser
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

In deciding if a statement is a representation, the court will consider

A
  • The importance of the statement.
  • The timing of the statement.
  • The reduction of the contract into writing.
  • Special knowledge or skill of the person making the statement.
  • Assumption of responsibility by the person making the statement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

How are express terms incorporated

A
  • A signed written contract
  • Incorporation by notice
  • Other ways of agreeing express terms
  • Incorporation by a course of dealing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

A signed written contract

A

In almost all cases then signing a contract shows that parties intended to be bound.

Even if they have not read the terms or understood them L’Estrange v Graucob Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Exception to Incorporating terms by signed written contract

Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996]

A

If the document signed was not intended to have any contractual effect (eg it was a document simply acknowledging receipt of goods) then the terms within it will not form part of the contract.

‘post contractual document’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Oral Misrepresentation

A

Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co [1951]
A party may be prevented from relying on incorporation of a clause through signature
of a document if it has orally misrepresented the meaning of the clause to the other party`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Incorporation by notice

A

ie by one party notifying the other party of them.
Where reasonable steps have been taken to draw terms to a party’s attention, that
party’s persistence with the transaction suggests an intention to be bound by the terms

Parker v South Eastern Railway Co (1876-77)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Reasonable Notice: Incorporation by notice

A

Thompson v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1930]
* terms may be incorporated by reference to a different document (in this case the contractual document, a ticket, referred to terms contained within a railway timetable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Insufficient notice

A
  • Henderson v Stevenson (1875): where the clause was not referred to on the front of the ticket
  • Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941]: clause was illegible.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Incorporation by notice of adverse terms

A
  • Must clearly bring these tot the other party’s attention
  • Denning MR stated that would need printing in red ink with a red hand to it or something equally startling
    (Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking)
  • Confirmed in: Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1989]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Parker v South Eastern Railway Co (1876-77)

A
  • Limit of liability for bags costing more than £10 that are lost or stolen.
  • Notified via signs
  • Parker argued he did not see notice or ticket believing it was a receipt
  • Court held that an individual cannot escape a contractual term by failing to read the contract but that a party wanting to rely on an exclusion clause must take reasonable steps to bring it to the attention of the customer.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Thompson v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1930]

A
  • Exclusion clause for inuries
  • Company had taken sufficient steps to bring the terms to customers’ attention in clear and legible print.
  • Accepting the ticket for travel constituted acceptance of the terms of travel
  • Reference to the time tables amounted to adequate notice of the existence of the terms and of their contents.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Henderson v Stevenson (1875)

A
  • Luggage lost on voyage
  • Ticket by steamer
  • not on front of the ticket
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941]

A

A date stamp made the writing on the ticket illegible. The clause was therefore not incorporated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971]

A
  • Ticket tried to incorporate conditions displayed on premises.
  • Slipped/liability
  • When did offer and acceptance take place
  • Exclusion clause not successfully incorporated; not brought to attention prior to contract formation.
  • Offer was notice at entrance - too late to retract.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual
Programmes Ltd [1989]

A
  • Transparencies should be returned, holding fee.
  • SCP contended they were unaware of standard conditions and had not be sent copy prior.
  • Insufficent steps to communicate onerous terms
  • Clause not successfully incorporated into the contract.
  • Where a clause is particularly onerous, as in this case, and the fees are exorbitant at ten times the level of other photographic libraries, the party seeking to rely on the clause must show they have taken reasonable steps to bring the clause to the other party’s attention.
  • IPL had failed to do this and they could, therefore, only recover fees assessed on a quantum meruit basis.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Incorporation of terms: Timings

A
  • Reasonable notice of it must be given before or at the time of contracting.
  • Clause not binding term if it is
    communicated only after the contract is made

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971]

A

Car parking
The contract had been formed before the machine produce the ticket, and the conditions referred to on the ticket or later were not incorporated into the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Contractual Effect - Incorporation of terms

A

Terms will only be incorporated by notice if the document giving notice was intended to have ‘contractual effect’

Chapleton v Barry UDC [1940]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Chapleton v Barry UDC [1940]

A

Hired a deck chair, paid.
On the back of the ticket there were T&Cs.
Not binding, as ticket was not intended to have contractual effect

53
Q

Incorporation by a course of dealing

A
  • Parties have dealt with each other on many occasions
  • if a term was brought to the notice of the other party during previous dealings, it may
    be implied into the current transaction

must be shown that the course of dealing has been consistent over a period of time

54
Q

McCutcheon v David MacBrayne [1964

A
  • Incorporation by course of dealing was unsuccessful
  • Written terms relied upon had not been consistently incorporated in the past
  • Signature sometimes required sometimes not
55
Q

Regularity of course of dealing

A
  • To incorporate terms the course of dealing must be consistent and regular
  • If irregular then the terms will not be incorporated
    Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd [1972]
56
Q

Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd [1972]

A
  • Three or four transactions over a period of five years
  • Insufficiently regular
57
Q
  • Henry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969]
  • Petrotrade Inc v Texaco Ltd [1999]
A
  • Three or four times per month
  • Five instances over 13 months
  • Both were held to be sufficiently regular
58
Q

Other ways of agreeing express terms

A
  • Email exchange
  • Verbal agreement
59
Q

Entire Agreement clauses are unlikely…

A

Entire Agreement clauses are unlikely to exclude liability for misrepresentation

60
Q

Exemption clauses are often onerous

A

As they can leave one party with a dramatically reduced remedy

61
Q

Entire Agreement Clauses

A

Parties might seek to reduce the uncertainty of inferred clauses and confusion by including in a written contract an ‘entire agreement’ clause.

62
Q
A
63
Q

How can terms be incorporated?

A
  • Written contract
  • Incorporated by notice, but “reasonable steps”
  • Regular and consistent course of dealing
  • Conversation or emails
  • An “entire agreement” clause helps
64
Q

Implied Term

A

Binding to the same extent as an express term.

May be implied in contract on the basis of fact or law

65
Q

Term implied in fact

A
  • Trade, customs and “business efficacy” to a contract
66
Q

Trade or professional customs

A

Intention of the parties to be bound by well-known customs of a particular trade

British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant [1975]

67
Q

British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant [1975]

A

here parties are of equal commercial bargaining power, the conditions usually contained within industry contracts would be successfully incorporated based on the common understanding of the parties. BCHC could, therefore, recover the costs of recovering the crane.

https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/british-crane-v-ipswich-plant.php

68
Q

A course of dealing between the parties

A

A term will only be implied in these circumstances
where the dealings of the parties have followed a consistent and regular pattern
(McCutcheon
v MacBrayne [1964] Hollier v Rambler Motors [1972] ).

69
Q

McCutcheon
v MacBrayne [1964]

A
70
Q

Hollier v Rambler Motors [1972] ).

A
71
Q

Business Efficacy

A

A term may be implied to give ‘business efficacy’ to a contract – to make the contract produce its intended objective
(The Moorcock (1889)

72
Q

(The Moorcock (1889)

A
73
Q

A term will only be implied on the ground of Business Efficacy if…

A

without the implied term, the arrangement would be so unworkable that sensible people could not be supposed to have entered into it.

‘Oh, of course’ (Shirlaw v Southern
Foundries [1939]

74
Q

Terms implied as a matter of law

A

erms can also be implied by the courts at common law in order to give effect to legal duties
which arise, as a matter of policy, out of certain common types of contractual relationships, for
example in the context of a landlord and tenant relationship (see Liverpool City Council v Irwin
[1976] 2 WLR 562). These are often referred to as terms implied in law.

75
Q

Liverpool City Council v Irwin
[1976] 2 WLR 562

A
76
Q

Terms implied by statute

A

Certain statutes indicate that stipulated terms will be implied into contracts.
Statutory implied
terms will also operate irrespective of the intention of the parties, unless there is a valid exemption
clause

77
Q

Examples of Statutory Implied Terms

A

Sale of Goods
Act 1979,
Consumer Rights Act 2015
Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982

78
Q

Terms implied by law

A
  • Either by common law
  • Or by statute
79
Q

Terms can be implied in fact

A
  • basis of a custom or * basis of a course of dealing between the parties.
  • to give “business efficacy” to a contract.
80
Q

Terms can be implied at common law

A

as a matter of policy, in certain types of relationships

81
Q

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 does not apply to.

A

Do not apply to consumer contracts as defined in the Consumer Rights Act 2015

82
Q

Sale of Goods Act 1979
S12

A

Title
Section 12 provides for the implication that the seller has the right to sell the goods.

The term implied by ss 12(1) is categorised as a condition of the contract.

83
Q

Sale of Goods Act 1979
S 13(1)

A

Correspondence with description
Where goods are described as having certain characteristics and specifications then they must correspond with that description.

A condition under s 13(1A)

84
Q

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 s14(2)

A

Satisfactory Quality

A reasonable person.

Section 14 2(B) A checklist of what counts as satisfactory quality

85
Q

Satisfactory Qualirt

A

(a) Fitness for all the purposes for which goods of the kind in question are commonly supplied;
(b) Appearance and finish;
(c) Freedom from minor defects;
(d) Safety; and
(e) Durability.

86
Q

SGA s 14 (3)

A

Fitness for a particular purpose.

No implied condition when the buyer does not rely, or it is unreasonable for him to rely on the seller’s skill or judgement.

Breach of a condition

87
Q

SGA, s 15

A

Sale by sample

Two conditions implied

  • The bulk will correspond with the sample in quality
  • Free from any defect… which would not be apparent on reasonable examination of the sample
88
Q

SGA, s15A

A

Modification of remedies for the breach of condition

If the breach is so slight it would be unreasonable for the buyer to reject the goods - should be treated as a breach of warranty, damages only

Burden on Seller

89
Q

Contracting out of the SGA

A

Can be excluded and/or restricted by the agreement of the parties, subject to Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

90
Q

UCTA 1977

A

Unfair Contract Terms Act

S6(1)(1) - title cannot be excluded or restricted

13 - 15 can be excluded subject to the requirement of reasonableness

91
Q

s12 - quick fire

A

Title

92
Q

s13(1) quick fire

A

Description

93
Q

s 14(2) quick fire

A

Satisfactory quality

94
Q

s14(3) - quick fire

A

Fit for particular purpose the purchaser has expressly or impliedly made known

95
Q

s15 quick fire

A

The bulk of the goods must correspond with sample

96
Q

Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982

A

Implication of terms in:
(a) Certain contracts for the transfer of property in goods;
(b) Contracts for the hire of goods; and
(c) Contracts for the supply of services.

97
Q

SGSA does not apply to

A

Consumer contracts defined in CRA 2015

98
Q

SGSA 1982: Contracts for the transfer of property - other than

A

(a) A contract of sale of goods;
(b) A hire purchase agreement;
(c) A contract under which the property in goods is or is to be transferred in exchange for trading
stamps;
(d) A transfer made by deed for which there is no consideration other than presumed
consideration; and
(e) A contract intended to operate by way of security.

99
Q

SGSA - Contracts for the hire of goods

A

a contract
under which one person bails or agrees to bail goods to another by way of hire Other than:

  • Hire purchase agreement
  • goods are bailed in exchange for trading stamps.
100
Q

SGSA: Contracts for the supply of services

A
  • Care and skill (s13)
  • Reasonable time (s14)
  • Consideration = reasonable charge (s15)
101
Q

Contracting out of terms implied under the SGSA

A

Can contract out, subject to the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

102
Q

Consumer Rights Act - S1

A

deals with consumer contracts for goods, digital content, and services.

103
Q

Consumer Rights Act - S2

A

Regulates unfair terms (in consumer contracts).

104
Q

The three sections of the Consumer Rights Act 2015

A
  • Contracts for goods
  • Contracts for digital content
  • Contracts for services
105
Q

A consumer, CRA 2015

A

Defined as “an individual acting for purposes that are wholly or mainly outside that individual’s trade, business, craft or profession”

106
Q

Trader, CRA 2015

A

A person acting for purposes relating to that person’s trade, business, craft or profession, whether acting personally or through another person acting in the trader’s name or on the trader’s behalf

107
Q

CRA 2015: Contracts for goods

A

s9 - Satisfactory quality
s10 - Reasonably fit for any purpose
s 11 - match description

108
Q

CRA: Contracts for digital content

A
  • s34 Satisfactory quality
  • s35 Reasonably fit for purpose
    *s36 Match description
109
Q

CRA: Contracts for services

A
  • s49 Reasonable care and skill
  • s51 Reasonable price to be paid
  • s52 Reasonable time

s50(1) - anything said/written to the consumer to be included as a term if taken into account when entering the contract

110
Q

As well as implying terms, the CRA also ….

A

Specifies remedies when terms are breached

111
Q

CRA Remedies - Contracts for good

A
  • Short term right to reject (usually 30 days)
  • Right to repair or replace
  • Right to reduce price, or final right to reject
112
Q

NEED TO RELOOK AT CRA

A
113
Q

Significance of distinguishing between conditions and warranties

A

In a breach of a contract
Term - repudiate, sue
Warranty - sue

114
Q

Distinguish between conditions and warranties

A

A condition is an important term ‘going to the root of the contract’
(Poussard v Spiers (1876)).

A warranty is a less important term not going to the root of the contract.

115
Q

Poussard v Spiers (1876)

A
116
Q

What is a crucial question when distinguishing breach of relevant term?

A

Did the parties intend at the time of contracting, that any breach of the relevant term could result in the innocent party terminating

117
Q

Inominate terms

A

Distinction between conditions and warranties not exhaustive

Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962]

118
Q

n Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962]

A

CoA - many terms which are neither conditions nor warranties.

Term: Ship hired, ‘in every way fitted for ordinary cargo service

Does the breach deprive the party substantially of the whole benefit of the contract?

119
Q

Condition

A

An important term going to the root of contract

120
Q
A
121
Q

Warranty

A

Less important term not going to the root of contract

122
Q

Inominate term

A

A term which at the outset is neither a condition or warranty but is of an intermediate nature.

123
Q

SGA ss 12 -15

A

Condition

Breach gives rise to right to reject and claim refund

124
Q

SGSA, s13

A

Innominate Terms

125
Q

Section 15 A

A

If breach is so slight it is unreasonable for the buyer to
repudiate the contract and reject the goods, should be treated as a breach of
warranty

126
Q

A party that has committed a breach of condition is said to have committed a …

A

Repudiatory breach

127
Q

Repudiatory Breach

A
  • A party that has committed a breach of condition is said to have
    committed a repudiatory breach. * innocent party has a right to treat the contract as repudiated ie they can terminate the contract.
128
Q

Time for performance or completion

A
  • Time is of the essence, lateness will amount to
    a repudiatory breach entitling the other party to terminate the contract.
  • If time is not of the essence, can become so by serving notice with a reasonable completion date
129
Q
A

Public 1 and Contract (16 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions