Contracts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

contract

A

Legally enforceable agreement that contains the rights and responsibilities of the contracting parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

UCC Terms Needed

A

The UCC “fills the gap” for missing contract terms other than the parties, subject matter, and quantity. The quantity term must specify an amount that is certain or capable of being made certain by reference to objective facts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

offer

A

An offer is an objective manifestation of a present intent to enter into an agreement, which is determined by whether an individual receiving the offeror’s communication would believe that acceptance would create an enforceable contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Contract not specifying assortment of goods

A

The UCC imposes a duty on the buyer of assorted goods to specify the assortment unless the contract states otherwise. The seller can treat the buyer’s failure to specify the assortment as a breach only if it materially impacts the seller’s performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Warranty of mechantability

A

The implied warranty of merchantability warrants that the goods sold are fit for their ordinary purpose, but this warranty is implied only when the seller is a merchant with respect to the goods sold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Termination of offer before acceptance

A

Offers can be terminated by revocation, rejection, lapse, or operation of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Offeror’s revocation

A

Offeror communicates revocation directly to offeree. OR Offeree learns information from reliable source that reasonably indicates offer was revoked (eg, house sold to another buyer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Offeree’s rejection

A

Offeree communicates rejection directly to offeror. Offeree’s counteroffer serves as rejection & new offer (Counteroffer does not terminate offer if offeree manifests intent to take offer under advisement.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lapse of offer

A

Time period specified in offer expires OR After reasonable time if no time period specified in offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Termination of Offer by Law

A

Either party dies or is adjudicated insane OR Subject matter of offer is destroyed or becomes illegal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

merger clause

A

a clause that declares the written contract to be the complete and final agreement between the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

promissory estoppel - a gift can be enforced when:

A

Under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, a party’s promise to make a gift is enforceable if (1) the promisor should reasonably expect the promisee to rely on the promise, (2) the promisee detrimentally relies on the promise, and (3) injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A requirements contract

A

an exclusive agreement between a buyer and a seller for the sale of as many goods as the buyer requires during a specified period. The buyer’s purchase of the goods from another seller violates the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing and constitutes a breach of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

An output contract

A

an exclusive agreement between a seller and a buyer for the sale of as many goods as the seller makes during a specified period. The seller’s sale of the goods to another buyrt violates the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing and constitutes a breach of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A contracting party’s duty to perform is discharged by impracticability when

A

(1) an unanticipated or extraordinary event makes it impracticable for the party to perform, (2) the contract was formed under a basic assumption that the event would not occur, and (3) the party seeking discharge was not at fault in causing the event to occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

unilateral contract

A

arises when an offeror promises something in return for an offeree’s complete performance of a specified act. Therefore, a unilateral contract is not formed until the offeree’s performance is fully completed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

objective theory of contracts

A

a party’s intent to contract is judged by outward objective facts as interpreted by a reasonable person—not a party’s subjective intent or belief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Bilateral Contract

A

can be accepted with a return promise or by starting performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Auctions

A

If goods in an auction sale are offered in lots, each lot represents a separate sale. An auction sale is complete when the auctioneer announces its end, such as by the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer or in any other customary way. When a bid is made contemporaneously with the falling of the hammer, the auctioneer may, at her discretion, treat the bid as continuing the bidding process or declare the sale completed at the fall of the hammer.

In a reserve auction, the auctioneer may withdraw the goods any time before she announces completion of the sale. An auction is with reserve unless specifically announced as a no-reserve auction. In a no-reserve auction, after the auctioneer calls for bids on the goods, the goods cannot be withdrawn unless no bid is received within a reasonable time. In either type of auction, a bidder may retract her bid until the auctioneer announces the completion of the sale. A retraction, however, does not revive any earlier bids.

When an auctioneer knowingly accepts a bid by the seller or on her behalf, or procures such a bid to drive up the price of the goods, the winning bidder may avoid the sale or, at her option, take the goods at the price of the last good-faith bid prior to the end of the auction. There are two exceptions to this rule, which are that (i) a seller may bid at a forced sale and (ii) a seller may bid if she specifically gives notice that she reserves the right to bid. Debtors and foreclosing creditors are both treated as “sellers” under the forced-sale exception to auction sales.

20
Q

Accord

A

Under an accord agreement, a party to a contract agrees to accept a performance from the other party that differs from the performance that was promised in the existing contract, in satisfaction of the other party’s existing duty. An accord requires consideration to be valid. That consideration can be worth less than what was agreed to in the original contract only if (1) there is a good-faith dispute as to the amount owed or (2) the new consideration is of a different type than what was owed under the original contract.

21
Q

Satisfaction

A

A “satisfaction” is the performance of the accord agreement; it will discharge both the original contract and the accord contract. However, there is no satisfaction until performance, and the original contract is not discharged until satisfaction is complete. Therefore, if an accord is breached by the party who has promised a different performance, the other party can sue either on the original contract or under the accord agreement.

22
Q

Accord and Satisfaction with negotiable instrument (i.e. check)

A

1) the obligation is unliquidated (i.e., uncertain in amount) or otherwise in dispute

2) the obligor, in good faith, tenders the negotiable instrument with a conspicuous statement that the instrument is tendered as full satisfaction of the obligation and

3) the obligee obtains payment of the instrument (e.g., by cashing the check).

23
Q

third-party beneficiary

A

a nonparty to a contract who receives some advantage or benefit from that contract. There are two types of third-party beneficiaries: intended and incidental

24
Q

incidental third-party beneficiary

A

those who receive some indirect benefit from the contract even though there was no contractual intent to benefit them (i.e., all third-party beneficiaries who are not intended beneficiaries). Does not have contractual rights and cannot sue.

25
Q

Ways to discharge (excuse) contractual obligations

A

FIRM SCAN
Full performance of contractual obligations
Impossibility, impracticability, or frustration of purpose
Release (in writing only)
Mutual rescission
Substituted contract
Contract or covenant not to sue
Accord & satisfaction
Novation

26
Q

Promise to Pay a Debt Barred by the Statute of Limitations or Bankruptcy

A

A new promise to pay a debt after the statute of limitations has run is enforceable without any new consideration. When the new promise is an express promise, most states require that the new promise be in writing and signed by the debtor. In addition, a new promise may be implied when the obligor (i) voluntarily transfers of something of value (e.g., money, negotiable note) to the obligee as interest on, part payment of, or collateral security for the prior debt, (ii) voluntarily acknowledges to the obligee the present existence of the prior indebtedness, OR (iii) states to the obligee that the statute of limitations will not be pled as a defense.

27
Q

Effect of new terms in reply to offer (UCC) - nonmerchants

A

When the contract is for the sale of goods between nonmerchants or between a merchant and a nonmerchant, a definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or written confirmation that is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance of the original offer. This is true even if it states terms that are additional to or different from the offer, unless the acceptance is made expressly conditional on the offeror’s consent to the additional or different terms. The additional terms are treated as a proposal for addition to the contract that must be separately accepted by the offeror to become a part of the contract.

28
Q

Effect of new terms in reply to offer (UCC) - merchants

A

battle of the forms. In this situation, remember that a contract exists under the terms of the acceptance, unless (i) the terms materially alter the agreement, (ii) the offer expressly limits the terms, or (iii) the offeror objects to the new terms within a reasonable time after notice of the new terms is received.

UCC 2-207 (its too long for a flash card)

29
Q

Merchants

A

A merchant is one who regularly deals in the type of goods involved in the transaction or has specialized knowledge of the goods subject to the contract.

30
Q

Vesting of Intended Beneficiaries Rights

A

Once an intended beneficiary’s rights have vested, the contracting parties cannot modify or rescind the contract without the beneficiary’s consent. Vesting occurs when the beneficiary (1) materially changes position in justifiable reliance on the rights created, (2) manifests assent to the contract at a party’s request, or (3) files a lawsuit.

31
Q

Disclaiming Implied Warranty of Merchantability

A

The implied warranty of merchantability requires a merchant-seller to provide a buyer with merchantable goods. This warranty may be disclaimed for defects that an examination would have revealed if, before entering the contract, the buyer examined the goods as fully as desired or refused to examine them. Trade usage and conspicuous language waiving it.

32
Q

When a contractual duty cannot be delegated

A

(1) the other party has a substantial interest in having the delegating party perform or (2) the contract prohibits delegation.

33
Q

UCC Contract Modification

A

Under the UCC, no consideration is needed to modify a contract. All that is required is good faith—i.e., honesty in fact and fair dealing per reasonable commercial standards.

34
Q

Offer Termination by Lapse

A

An offer terminates by lapse if it is not accepted by a specified date or, if no date is specified, after a reasonable time. Reasonableness is determined by several factors, including (1) the nature of the contract, (2) the purpose and course of dealing between the parties, and (3) trade usage.

35
Q

Revokable Offer

A

a revocable offer terminates by revocation if it is revoked by the offeror prior to acceptance.

36
Q

Restitution for contract to perform an illegal act

A

A contract to perform an illegal act (e.g., fraud) is void and unenforceable. However, restitution damages may be recoverable if the claimant conferred a benefit on the other party and:

was justifiably ignorant of the facts that made the contract illegal*

was less culpable than the other party (i.e., was not in pari delicto) or

withdrew before the contract’s illegal purpose was achieved and did not engage in serious misconduct (e.g., shockingly immoral, unethical, or unjust behavior).

37
Q

Reformation

A

is a modification by a court of a written contract that fails to reflect the contracting parties’ intent. A party may seek reformation as an equitable remedy on several grounds, including mutual mistake.

38
Q

Mutual Mistake

A

A mutual mistake arises when both parties are mistaken as to an essential element of the contract. A court may reform a written contract due to mutual mistake if (1) there was a prior agreement, (2) the parties agreed to put the prior agreement in writing, AND (3) there is a difference between the prior agreement and the writing due to the mistake.

39
Q

Under the UCC, a buyer’s request for shipment of goods

A

Under the UCC, a buyer’s request for shipment of goods is construed as an offer that the seller may accept by (1) promising to ship the goods, (2) shipping conforming goods, or (3) shipping nonconforming goods without notice of accommodation. Shipping nonconforming goods without such notice constitutes an immediate breach.

40
Q

PER - Express Terms Supplemented

A

If the express contract terms are inconsistent with the course of performance, course of dealing, or trade usage, priority is given as follows: (i) express terms prevail over all others, (ii) course of performance prevails over course of dealing and trade usage, and (iii) course of dealing prevails over trade usage.

41
Q

Mailbox rule

A

An acceptance that is mailed within the allotted response time is effective when sent (not upon receipt), unless the offer provides otherwise. The mailing must be properly addressed and include correct postage.

42
Q

Mailing a rejection

A

If the offeree sends an acceptance and later sends a communication rejecting the offer, then the acceptance will generally control even if the offeror receives the rejection first. If, however, the offeror receives the rejection first and detrimentally relies on the rejection, then the offeree will be estopped from enforcing the contract.

If a communication is sent rejecting the offer, and a later communication is sent accepting the contract, then the mailbox rule will not apply, and the first one to be received by the offeror will prevail. An acceptance or rejection is received when the writing comes into the possession of the offeror or her agent, or when it is deposited in her mailbox. The offeror need not actually read the communication that is received first for it to prevail.

43
Q

Time is of the Essence

A

In a CL contract, the failure to perform by the time stated in the contract is generally not a material breach if performance is rendered within a reasonable time. However, if the nature of the contract makes timely performance essential, or if the contract expressly provides that time is of the essence, then the failure to perform on time is a material breach.

44
Q

Cure of a misrepresentation

A

If, following a misrepresentation but before the deceived party has avoided the contract, the facts are cured so as to be in accord with the facts that were previously misrepresented, then the contract will no longer be voidable by the deceived party.

45
Q

material benefit rule

A

Under the material benefit rule, when a party performs an unrequested service for another party that constitutes a material benefit, the modern trend permits the performing party to enforce a promise of payment made by the other party after the service is rendered, even though, at common law, such a promise would be unenforceable due to lack of consideration. This rule is not enforced when the performing party rendered the services without the expectation of compensation (e.g., as a gift).