Contracts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

type of law used in K

A

service: common law; good (all things moveable): UCC. If K has both goods and services, FL law determines whether the main purpose of the K is goods or services.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

K formation requirements

A

1-mutual assent: offer & acceptance; 2-consideration; and, 3-no valid defenses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

offer definition

A

invitation to enter into a K: 1-promise, 2-certain essential terms, and 3-communication w/ reasonable expectation of a K?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 types of termination

A

revocation of offer; rejection; and, lapse of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

revocation of offer definition

A

an offer is revocable before acceptance, and generally effective upon receipt unless: 1-option contract; 2-detrimental reliance; and 3-partial performance of unilateral contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

option contract rules

A

1-common law: consideration paid to keep offer open for a certain period of time; 2-FL mailbox rule: does not apply to option K; 3-UCC Firm Offer: offeror is a MERCHANT who signs written assurance that offer will be held open

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

detrimental reliance definition

A

the offeror could reasonably expect that the offeree would rely to his detriment on the offer; the offer will be irrevocable for a reasonable period of time in an option contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

partial performance of unilateral K: definition

A

where offeree’s performance has already begun, offeree has a reasonable time in which to perform,but offeree is NOT mandated to complete performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

rejection of K

A

includes counter-offer and conditional acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

lapse of time definition

A

failure to accept offer w/i a reasonable period of time or specificied period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

acceptance in general

A

a manifestation of intent to enter into an agreement; must be communicated in any “reasonable manner” before offer is terminated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

common law acceptance rule

A

mirror image rule: acceptance must be identical to the offer; otherwise no K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

UCC acceptance rule

A

a K is formed even if acceptance contains different or additional terms. 1-if one party is not a merchant, terms of offer control; 2-if both parties are merchants, the additional terms in the acceptance become part of the K unless: they materially alter the K, the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer, or the offeror objects to the terms w/n a reasonable time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

mailbox rule of acceptance

A

K created at moment of dispatch unless: 1-stipulation; 2-option K; 3-first arrival of rejection/acceptance; 4-rejection and detrimental reliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

consideration in general

A

requires: 1-bargained for exchange; 2-legal value (benefit or detriment) between parties. FL RULE: (legal minority value rule) that consideration is either benefit or a detriment to one party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

consideration: pre-existing duty

A

FL finds consideration when a pre-existing duty was owed to a 3rd party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

consideration: mutuality

A

both parties must be bound or = “illusory K”; discuss meetings of the minds, intent to be bound, mutual promises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

consideration: promissory estoppel

A

consideration is not necessary when: 1-promise reasonably expected to induce action or forbearance; 2-of q definite and substantial character, and; 3-action or forbearance induced causing detrimental reliance. Limited remedies: restitution and reliance damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

consideration substitute-FL promises under seal

A

imports consideration because oral K is harder to modify, but not conclusive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

no valid defenses exist generally

A

(usually 2-3 defenses in fact pattern) enforcement, absence of mutual assent, incapacity, excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

no valid defenses exist: enforcement

A

1-SOF: a K w/i the statute must be 1-in writing, 2-signed by party to be charged, and 3-contain the essential terms of the K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Statute of Frauds K types

A

land; one year rule Ks; sale of goods over $500.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

statute of frauds: land

A

promise creating an interest in land must adequately describe the land, identify the parties, and value to be paid. Ex.: sale of land, leases over 1 yr, fixtures, minerals/structures severed by buyer; mortgages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

statute of frauds: one year rule

A

promises that cannot be completed w/i one year from DATE OF AGREEMENT; must be in writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

statute of frauds: sale of goods

A

sale of goods over $500, except where: 1-the agreement is for specifically manufactured goods; 2-the agreement is b/w merchants & one sent a confirmatory memo; 3-a party admits the K in court of pleadings; 4-part payment or acceptance has been made, which makes the K enforceable to that extent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

FL specifically applies SOF to:

A

healthcare guarantees, debts barred by SOL, newspaper subscriptions, home solicitation sales, home improvement Ks, & credit card agreements to be in writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

defenses: enforcement: unconscionability

A

a K may be VOIDABLE where its clauses are extremely one-sided or unfair when made. This includes Ks w/ inconspicuous risk-shifting provisions (hidden disclaimers of warranty) and Ks of adhesion (“take it or leave it” where the parties don’t have equal bargaining power). Tested at TIME K WAS MADE, not later.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

defense: absence of mutual assent: unilateral mistake

A

K enforceable, unless: 1-unconscionable or 2-other party knew/should have known of the mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

defense: absence of mutual assent: mutual mistake

A

mutual mistake is a defense if: 1-concerns a basic assumption, 2-adverse material effect on agreed upon exchange, and 3-adversely affected party did not assume risk of the mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

defense: absence of mutual assent: ambiguity

A

1-neither party aware-no K unless both parties happened to intend the same meaning; 2-both parties aware-no K unless parties in fact intended the same meaning; 3-one party aware-binding K exists based on the ignorant party’s reasonable interpretation of ambiguous terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

defense: absence of mutual assent: fraudulent misrepresentation

A

“fraud in the inducement”- VOIDABLE K if innocent party justifiably relied upon the misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

defense: absence of mutual assent: non-fraudulent misrepresentation

A

must be representation of a material fact justifiably relied upon; remedy = recission of K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

defense: incapacity

A

K w/ minor, intoxicated person, or person lacking mental capacity are VOIDABLE, except for minors who misrepresent age.

34
Q

defense: incapacity: minors/infants

A

marriage of minor removes contractual incapacity. FL Statutory exceptions: 1-loans for higher education; 2-quality for home, farm, or business loan act; 3-seek prenatal care or care for child, even if not married

35
Q

defense: incapacity: duress or undue influence

A

duress: physical or economic threats; undue influence: within a caregiver or confidential relationship

36
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: conditions

A

an event other than the passage of time that MUST occur/fail to occur; excuses performance; not a breach/promise; in FL subsequent acts may be used to determine whether it was a condition or promise

37
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: condition precedent

A

occurs before performance due to relieve performance obligations

38
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: condition subsequent

A

Occurance “cuts off” an existing duty to perform; party to whom duty was owed may waive the duty; person having the benefit of a condition may indicate by words or conduct that she won’t insist on it

39
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: recovery under unjust enrichment in general

A

where a condition fails to occur and one party has performed

40
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: recovery under unjust enrichment: excuse by anticipatory repudiation

A

words or conduct that UNEQUIVOCALLY indicate an inability or an unwillingness to perform when time comes. The alternative for the non-repudiating party are: 1-treat the anticipatory repudiation as a total repudiation and sue immediately; 2-suspend his own performance and wait to sue until the due date; 3-treat as an offer to rescind and treat the K as discharged; 4-ignore the repudiation and urge performance

41
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: recovery under unjust enrichment: excuse by divisibility of K

A

allows partial performance/remedy for unperformed part of K; created when: 1-performance by each party is divided into 2 or more parts under K; 2-number of parts due by each party is the same; 3-performance of each part by one party is equal to the corresponding part by the other party

42
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: impossibility

A

OBJECTIVE standard that excuses performance. (no one could have performed according to the K terms). 1-must arise after the K was entered into such as death or incapacity or performer, unless performance can be delegated; new law rendering K illegal; destruction of K’s subject matter at no fault f promisor and no longer possible to perform. NOTE: destruction of a building in progress does not discharge duty to rebuild.

43
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: impracticability

A

EXCUSES a party’s performance. Requires that a party encounter “extreme and unreasonable difficulty or expense” that was NOT anticipated. A mere change due to normal risks that could have been anticipated is not good enough. Fl RATIONALE: “circumstances causing breach have made performance vitally different different from what was anticipated; so that K cannot reasonably be thought to govern.”

44
Q

defense: excuse/discharge of performance or non-performance: frustration of purpose

A

EXCUSES performance because it is pointless. Requires: 1-supervening event; 2-unforeseeable at the time of K; 3-completely or almost completely destroy’s K purpose; 4-as understood by both parties

45
Q

K modification: common law

A

if a party has a pre-existing duty to perform, then attempts to modify the K, the new K is not enforceable unless: 1-new or different consideration is given (consideration is required); 2-the promise ratifies voidable obligation ( a promise to pay a debt barred by the SOL); 3-the promise is made to a 3rd party; or 4-there is an honest dispute as to whether a duty is owed

46
Q

K modification: UCC

A

NO consideration required when modification is made in good faith

47
Q

K modification: FL & consideration

A

FL follows the majority rule that a “slight deviation” in terms is sufficient consideration to support modification

48
Q

interpretation of K: Parole evidence rule

A

where parties to a K express their agreement IN WRITING with intent of INTEGRATION (final expression of their bargain); any other expressions made prior or contemporaneous with are INADMISSIBLE as evidence to vary the K terms. Evidence offered to prove fraud, duress, mistake, misrepresentation, illegality, or modification is inadmissible.

49
Q

interpretation of K: Parole evidence rule: Corbin test

A

majority test that considers the “specific circumstances of the transaction involved.”

50
Q

interpretation of K: Parole evidence rule: williston test

A

minority test that only looks at the face of the written agreement

51
Q

warranties in general

A

Ks for sale of goods generally include either express or implied warranties

52
Q

implied warranty of merchantability

A

in every sale by a MERCHANT who deals in goods of a kind, there is an implied warranty that the goods are “merchantable” (“fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used”). Specific disclaimer in written sales K must mention “merchantability” and must be “conspicuous” (larger type, contrasting color/font, marks draw reader’s attention).

53
Q

implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

A

ANY SELLER, merchant or not, has reason to KNOW OF THE PARTICULAR PURPOSE for which the goods are being used, and that BUYER RELIES on the seller’s skill and judgment to select suitable goods. Specific disclaimer in writing must be conspicuous.

54
Q

express warranty

A

any affirmation of fact, promise, description, model, or sample, made by seller to buyer, which is part of the basis of bargain, which buyer could have relied upon to enter K. Once made, express warranties are very difficult to disclaim, because contradictory language between the warranty and disclaimer is read in favor of the warranty, overriding the disclaimer.

55
Q

breach in general

A

1-an absolute duty to perform, and 2-the duty has not been performed or has been performed inadequately or improperly.

56
Q

minor breach definition

A

non-breaching party receives substantial benefit of bargain despite the breaching party’s failure to perform. Does not discharge non-breaching party from duty to perform, just gives rights to damages

57
Q

material breach definition

A

non-breaching party does NOT receive the substantial benefit of her bargain. Discharges non-breaching party’s duty to perform and she has immediate right to seek remedies.

58
Q

minor v. material breach

A

1-amount of benefit received by non-breaching party; 2-adequacy of compensation for damages to injured party; 3-extent of performance by breaching party; 4-hardship to breaching party; 5-negligent or willful behavior of breaching party; 6-likelihood of performance of remainder of K

59
Q

UCC perfect tender rule

A

if goods or their delivery fail to conform to the K in any way, the buyer may reject all, accept all, or partially accept/reject any ratio of commercial units

60
Q

Exceptions to UCC perfect tender rule

A

1-installment Ks- installments can be rejected only if non-conformity “substantially impairs” the value of that installment AND it cannot be cured; same with K as a whole; 2-seller’s right to cure: a seller has a right to cure in the following situations: a-seller may cure after giving reasonable notice of intent to cure and furnishing new tender of conforming goods, if within original K performance time allowed, buyer must accept or b-after time for performance of K has expired, if buyer rejects goods that seller reasonably believed would be acceptable, seller may provide reasonable notice of intent to cure, giving seller additional time to cure. seller’s reasonable belief is determined by: 1-trade practices or prior dealing w/ buyer; or 2-seller unaware of defect despite proper business conduct

61
Q

damages in general

A

P MUST MITIGATE damages; avoidable damages are not recoverable

62
Q

damages: specific performance: in general

A

K is for something rare or unique and monetary damages are inadequate.

63
Q

damages: specific performance: land

A

land can be gotten through specific performance; alternative is injunction

64
Q

damages: specific performance: service Ks

A

cannot get specific performance because it’s akin to involuntary servitude; can get injunction

65
Q

damages: specific performance: covenant not to compete

A

must be 1-reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate interest; 2-reasonable geographic scope and duration; 3-not harm the public

66
Q

damages: specific performance: equitable defenses available

A

laches, unclean hands, sale to bona fide purchaser

67
Q

damages: monetary: compensatory damages

A

put non-breaching party in same position as if K had been performed

68
Q

damages: monetary: expectation damages

A

give the non-breaching party the benefit of her bargain; K price - market price

69
Q

damages: monetary: reliance damages

A

non-breaching party’s cost of performance

70
Q

damages: monetary: consequential damages

A

ANY damages recoverable if: 1-reasonably foreseeable when K was made; 2-unavoidable through reasonable efforts; 3-provable with reasonable certainty (available to buyer only in sale of goods)

71
Q

damages: monetary: incidental damages

A

in sale of goods, non-breaching party: buyer’s expense of inspection, transportation, custody & care; seller’s expense of storing, shipping, returning and reselling

72
Q

damages: monetary: punitive damages

A

generally NOT awarded in Ks

73
Q

damages: monetary: liquidated damages

A

amount stipulated to by parties in K in event of breach: must be 1-difficult to estimate at K formation and 2-reasonable forecast of compensatory damages

74
Q

damages: restitution

A

prevents unjust enrichment when non-breaching party has not fully performed where K unenforceable or no K exist; recovery is value of “benefit conferred”

75
Q

damages: rescission

A

K VOIDABLE- “never existed” if before or at time K entered: 1-mutual mistake; 2-unilateral mistake if other party knew or extreme hardship by mistaken party; 3-misrepresentation; 4-duress, undue influence, illegality, incapacity or no consideration. Equitable defenses are laches, unclean hands

76
Q

damages: reformation

A

K is modified to conform to parties’ original intent; proven by clear and convincing evidence

77
Q

damages: SOL

A

FL written K = 5 years; oral K = 4 years; parties may not lengthen, but may limit to 1 year

78
Q

tortious interference with K

A

interference w/ business relationship: 1-K between parties; 2-3rd party knew of relationship; 3-3rd party causes breach; 4-damages, i.e. money lost

79
Q

consideration: forms

A

i) A return promise to do something;
ii) A return promise to refrain from doing something legally permitted;
iii) The actual performance of some act; or
iv) Refraining from doing some act.

80
Q

Florida Distinction: Promise to Pay a Debt Barred by the Statute of Limitations

A

In Florida, for a promise to pay a debt after the statute of limitations has run to be enforceable, it must satisfy the Statute of Frauds and be in writing and signed by the party to be charged. Fla. Stat. § 95.04.

81
Q

Test for impracticability in a K

A

in FL, the rationale for the doctrine of impracticability is that circumstances causing breach have made performance vitally different from what was anticipated, so that the K cannot reasonably be thought to govern.