Contracts Flashcards
Elements of Bargain
Manifestation of Mutual Assent + Certainty of Terms + Consideration
Mutual Assent
Intent to enter into bargain objectively, reasonably manifest from either party’s perspective
Most often: Offer + Assent
Common law certainty: required terms
parties, subject matter, price, quantity
U.C.C. certainty: required terms
parties, subject matter and quantity
No duration term specified (or vague duration term like “employment for life” or “permanent employment”) in employment contract?
Then at will contract implied
Do plans to memorialize contract in writing prevent formation of contract?
No, BUT circumstances may show that agreements are preliminary negotiations.
RC § 27 Manifestations of assent are themselves SUFFICIENT to conclude contract regardless fo manifest intention to memorialize bargain in writing
Factors:
- extent to which express agreement has been reached on all terms that will eventually be included in the writing
- whether contract of this type is usually reduced to a writing
- whether writing is required for full expression of bargain
- whether bargain included few or many details
Offer
manifestation of willingness to enter into bargain (must acknowledge, if not, define, both sides of the bargain)
must justify the other’s understanding that his acceptance is invited and if properly tendered, will conclude the bargain
Offers create power to accept in oferee
Unilateral or Bilateral?
Unilateral: FULL performance is only valid manner of acceptance (offer temporaily irrevocable when oferee begins performance)
- unilateral is offeree’s performance in exchange for offeror’s promise
Thus, offeror only bound if offeree performs
Bilateral: acceptence in some form other than performance (promise) required prior to performance to create contract
bilateral is offeree’s promise in exchange for offeror’s promise
Do courts assume bilateral or unilateral?
bilateral unless offeror explicitly demands performance rather than promise
Acceptance
- manifestation of assent
- to terms of offer
- by offeree
- in proper manner (dictated by offeror, or if not, by any reasonable means)
Acceptance by Silence
- offeree takes benefit of offered services with reasonable opportunity to reject htem and reason to know that they were offered with the expection of compensation
- offeror has stated or given oferee reason to understand that assent may be manifested by silence or inaction, AND offeree remains silent and inactive AND offeree intents to accept offer (as determined by reasonable/objective standard)
Mailbox rule
ONLY APPLIES TO ACCEPTANCES
Acceptance generally takes effect upon its dispatch
Exception: Offeree sends rejection to offer, then sends acceptance–whichever the offeror receives first takes effect
BECAUSE REJECTION ONLY EFFECTIVE WHEN RECEIVED
Mirror image rule
Acceptance by promise only valid if it’s terms are precise mirror image of terms in offer
“acceptance” that conflicts at all with terms of offer is in fact a counter-offer
Promise to perform not followed by any acceptance, is this enforceable?
Only if promissory estoppel (detrimental reliance applies): promissee (1) reasonably and (2) detrimentally relied on promise
Promissory estoppel elements
Promisee’s reliance was reasonable:
- reasonably foreseeable to promisor that promisee would rely on promise
detrimental reliance
- promisee must have suffered some injury due to reliance on promise and promisor’s failure to perform
A offers for bilateral K to B; B sends acceptance; B sends rejection; A receives rejection first; A doesn’t perform; B sues for breach.
- Is there a K?
- Does B have a claim?
- Does A have a defense?
- Yes, there is a K per mailbox rule. A made offer and B sent acceptance. B’s acceptance was effective upon dispatch.
- Yes, there is a contract and A failed to perform. B has a claim against A.
- Yes, if A detrimentally relied on B’s rejection, a reasonable reliance since he received B’s rejection first, he has a claim to estoppel.
revocation
objective indication to offeree that offeror no longer has intent to enter bargain
when are revocations effective?
upon receipt
When may offeror revoke offer (terminate offeree’s power to accept)
Generally, an offeror may revoke offer anytime before acceptance
Ways to terminate offer/offeree’s power to accept
- explicit acceptance/rejection
- explicit revocation
- lapse after reasonable amount of time
- death/incapacity of offeror
- counter offer by original offeree
U.C.C. firm offer elements
- signed writing
- by merchant offeror
- indicating that offer will be held open for time indicated
When do bilateral contracts lapse?
after
- face to face conversation ends
- period expressed in offer passes
- reasonable amount of time passes
When does unilateral offer lapse?
- period expressed in offer lapses
- reasonable amount of time lapses
When may an offeror indirectly (not explicitly) revoke a unilteral contract?
- Offeror takes action inconsistent with offer; AND
- offeree discovers this action prior to starting performance
Promise to perform in exchange for performance (offer for unilateral contract), followed by start of performance: is there a contract?
No. Unilateral contract is not formed until performance is tendered (performance is the means of acceptance of a unilateral contract).
However, beginning performance terminates offeror’s power to revoke, offer must stay open for reasonable amount of time while other party completes performance.
When is notice of completion due in unilateral contract?
upon completion
Promise to perform in exchange for promise to perform (offer for bilateral contract), followed by begining to perform (no explicit promise made in response to offer): is there a contract?
Yes, beginning performance in response to offer for bilateral contract constitutes promise to perform and therefore acceptance.
Unilateral K, notificatino of completion required by K, what is effect of completion but no notification?
Offeror’s duties to perform are discharged UNLESS
1. offeror discovers completion; or
2. Offeree made reasonable effort to notify offeror or completion
Certainty
mutual assent must be to reasonably certain terms as to
- quantity
- price
- parties
- subject
time/place of delivery may be left uncertain, determinable by courts
Common law mirror image rule
acceptence must mirror all terms of offer, if not, then rejection of offer and counter offer
U.C.C. § 2-207
- Acceptance is any indication of intent to form a bargain
- Additional/differing terms only prevent acceptance and therefore contract formation IF acceptance is expressly conditional on additional/differing terms. In this case, the “acceptance” is a rejection and counter offer.
- If valid U.C.C. acceptance but with additional differing terms:
- IF one/both parties NOT merchants: contract formed as to definite and seasonable acceptance to terms. Any terms not agreed upon ADDITIONAL are proposals to be added to contract.
- IF both merchants: contract formed incorporating the ACCEPTANCE’s TERMS UNLESS the acceptances terms (1) materially alter the agreement; (2) offer expressly limits the terms; (3) offeror rejects new terms within reasonable time.
- DIFFERING terms are generally knocked out (this is jurisdictional, minority of jurisdictions do not apply knock out rule and treat differing terms same as additional terms)