Contracts Flashcards
Misunderstanding
Neither party was aware of ambiguity - no K formed unless both parties intended the same meaning
One party aware of ambiguity - K formed and enforced according to the intention of the unaware party
Both parties aware of ambiguity - no K formed unless both parties intended the same meaning
Mutual Mistake vs Unilateral Mistake
Mutual Mistake: K is voidable by an adversely affected party if both parties are mistaken concerning
Unilateral Mistake: Will not prevent K formation UNLESS non-mistaken party knew or should have known of the mistake
Parole Evidence Rule (PER)
Under the PER, evidence that is extrinsic to a written K is inadmissible to supplement or contradict the K if it is a complete integration.
Extrinsic Evidence may be allowed if a) K was only partially integrated or b) additional terms would ordinarily be in a separate agreement
PER allows evidence of: mistake, misrepresentation, condition precedents, modifications, meanings of ambigious terms
- What is the ROL for shipment K?
- What is the ROL for a destination K?
- What is the ROL for non-carrier delivery by merchant seller?
- What is the ROL for non-carrier, non-merchant seller?
- What is FOB [location]?
- Shipment K = ROL passes to buyer when seller delivers goods to carrier
- Destination K = ROL passes to buyer only when buyer takes delivery
- ROL passes to buyer when he takes physical possession
- ROL passes to buyer upon tender of delivery
- Seller bears the risk and expense of getting goods to the named location, at which point the ROL passes to buyer
Warranties
UCC Ks have default implied warranties
Express warranty - promise about the quality or feature of a product
Implied Warranty of Merchantability - seller automatically warrants goods are fit for their ordinary purpose
Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose - seller automatically warrants that goods are fit for buyer’s purpose if: 1) buyer has particular purpose; 2) buyer relies on seller to select suitable goods; and 3) seller has reason to know of buyer’s purpose and reliance on seller
Expectation damages
Puts the non-breaching party where it would have been had the promise been performed. Expectation damages must be reasonably foreseeable at K formation
Reliance damages
If expectation damages too speculative, cost of performance made in reliance of K
Consequential damages
Losses resulting from breach that a reasonable person would have foreseen
Unconscionability
Unconscionability: The test is whether in light of the general commercial background and needs of the particular parties, K is so one sided as to be unconscionable under the circumstances at time of formation.