contracts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what are contracts?

A

a legally binding agreement that will be enforced by the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the content of a contract

A

obligations between parties. failure to perform these obligations, gives the right to a remedy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does the supply chain consist of?

A

supplier, distributer, manufacturer, retailer, logistics and consumer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

private law is within the area of…

A

national law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

private law covers

A

law of persons (family law, company law),and law of obligation (contract tort and property)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

contract law consists of:

A

private regulations, contractual liability, person better-off with enforcement of promise,private parties(claiment vs respondent), obligations fixed by parties to the contract, succesful claim is a remedy for the person complaining

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

tort law consists of:

A

private regulations, extra-contractual liability, places parties in position they were before, private parties (claimentvs respondent), obligations fixed by law, and succesful claim is a remedy for the person complaining

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

types of parties within agreements

A

business to business, business to consumer and consumer to consumer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

reasons for performance

A
  • promise in exchange for a promise, bilateral contract, e.g. the sale of a bike
  • a promise in exchange for an act, unilateral contract, e.g. reward for information about a criminal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

types of performance

A

marriage, employment contracts, insurance, intellectual property, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

party agreement

A

Standard form contracts, General terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

formal sources of law

A
  • National law (e.g. civil/common law)
  • Default rules, facilitative rules, mandatory rules
  • Regional Law (e.g. EU law)
  • International Law (e.g. CISG)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

informal sources of law

A
  • Non-state organizations
  • Academics
  • Non-binding soft law
  • e.g. Principles, Restatements, DFCR
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

meaning of freedom within contracts

A
  • The autonomy of parties to make the choices they desire in contracting
  • On Whatever terms (Freedom with regard to content)
  • Whenever desired (Freedom to contract or not to contract)
  • With Whomever (Freedom to choose the other party)
  • BUT there are limits!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Binding Force meaning

A
  • Agreements lawfully entered into by parties, have the force of law between the parties.
  • Binding (i.e. there will be a consequence if the contract is breached)
  • Party in default MUST compensate the party not in breach
  • UNLESS terms are deemed unfair or prohibited by law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Informality

A
  • Contracts do not require any particular form.
  • HOWEVER a particular may form be required by law for certain contacts to be valid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Contractual fairness

A

procedural fairness within a contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

procedural fairness

A
  • unequal position between the parties is remedied
  • NOT Substantive fairness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Substantive fairness

A

The contents of the contract is up to the parties even if to anybody else the contract seems to be a ‘bad contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

contract formation

A

offer, acceptance, intention, formality, capacity, lack of vitiating factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Concensus ad idem

A

To have the same understanding of the terms of the agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Mutual Assent

A

− A contract is an agreement between parties
− This agreement is evidence of consensus ad idem (agreement as to the same thing)
− The promisor makes the offer (also known as the offeror)
− The promisee is the person to whom offer is made (also known as the offeree)
− Acceptance of offer creates an agreement, which if legally enforceable is a contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Effect of making the promise

A

Undertaking that certain state of affairs exists − Undertaking that something shall happen or not happen in the future − Failure (of the promisor to do or refrain from doing the action promised) = a breach − Breach creates legal right to remedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Definition of an ‘obligatory agreement

A

An agreement in the sense of this Section is a more-sided (multilateral) juridical act under which one or more parties have subjected themselves to an obligation towards one or more other parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Definition of ‘juridical act’

A
  • A juridical act requires the will (intention) of the acting person to establish a specific legal effect, which will (intention) has to be expressed through a statement of the acting person.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Creation of agreement

A

An agreement comes to existence by an offer and its acceptance

27
Q

an offer

A
  • The obligations to which parties subject themselves under the agreement, must be determinable.
  • An offer is ‘an expression of willingness to contract on certain terms, made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed.’
28
Q

offer vs invitation to treat

A

An invitation to treat is not an offer but an indication that a person is willing to enter into a negotiation to enter into a contract: Depending on jurisdiction, there are legal presumptions regarding certain transactions

29
Q

questions to ask to find out if there is an offer.

A

YES: Sufficiently definite as to the relevant terms.
NO: If there still room for negotiation or request for information.

YES: Clear Intention to be bound by terms immediately upon acceptance.
NO: There is invitation to negotiate the terms

YES: There is certainty regarding substance contract (benefit conferred / subject matter/ time, place or manner of performance
NO: There is a lack of certainty

30
Q

revocable offer definition

A

offer without engagement for the offeror; option rights

31
Q

revocable offer

A
    1. An offer may be revoked, unless it points out a period for its acceptance or its irrevocability results in another way from the offer. −
    1. A revocable offer can only be revoked as long as it has not been accepted and the addressed party has not yet sent a message in which he accepts the offer. … −
    1. A contractual provision under which one of the parties has engaged himself to enter into a specific agreement with the opposite party as soon as the opposite party requests so, is regarded as an irrevocable offer.
32
Q

acceptance

A

must be unconditional, An Acceptance must mirror the offer. * The party accepting (offeree) tries to change anything about the offer this is NOT an acceptance but a COUNTER-OFFER!

33
Q

counter offer

A
  • The COUNTER-OFFER takes the place of the OFFER.
    − The COUNTER-OFFER becomes the OFFER
34
Q

communication theories on acceptance

A

moment it is written, moment it is sent, the moment it is received, moment it is read

35
Q

which country uses the receipt rule: it must have reached the offeror

A

netherlands

36
Q

which country uses the dispatch rule: takes effect the moment the acceptance is sent or posted

A

england

37
Q

explain the freedom of contract situation

A

to enter into a contract, you must consent to giving up certain freedoms. if it is involuntary, the courts will not enforce the agreement.

38
Q

prohibited contracts

A
  • statutory illegality
  • contrary to public policy
39
Q

defects of consent

A
  • Mistake
  • Fraud
  • Threat / Duress
  • Undue Influence
  • Misrepresentation (CL)
40
Q

Avoidance

A

Cancelling a contract when it cannot be continued or is no longer
profitable. The parties are released from any future performance of their obligations
and restitution of that which has already been delivered may be required

41
Q

Rescission

A

Unmaking of a contract between parties. Rescission is the unwinding of
a transaction. This is done to bring the parties, as far as possible, back to the position
in which they were before they entered into a contract (the status quo ante)

42
Q

Void

A

Never existed in the eyes of the law; lacks enforceability in law

43
Q

voidable

A

Contract valid until party applies for contract to be declared void.

44
Q

Focus is to protect the party who believes there WAS a contract unless there is

A

− Mistake
− Misrepresentation
− Threats and duress
− Undue Influence

45
Q

mistakes within common law

A
  • Unilateral mistake
  • Common mistake
  • Mutual mistake
46
Q

three types of mistakes in English law

A

unilateral, mutual, common.
res extincta, res sua, as to quality

47
Q

Unilateral mistake

A
  • Only one party is mistaken
  • Contract will be upheld unless non-mistaken party was aware of the mistake and tried to take advantage
48
Q

Mutual mistake

A

Both parties mistaken, but different mistaken belief

49
Q

Common Mistake: Res Extincta

A

The court held that since the subject matter of the agreement did not in fact exist at the time of contracting, the contract was void for mistake

50
Q

Common Mistake: Res Sua

A

a mutual mistake and misapprehension as to their relative and respective rights, the result is that that agreement is liable to be set aside as having proceeded upon a common mistake” on such terms as the court thinks fit to impose

51
Q

Common mistake: As to Quality

A

Both parties had made the same mistake.

52
Q

Common mistake: As to Quality

A

Both parties had agreed to the terms of a contract for settlement and that is what they got. This type of mistake is very narrowly construed to promote certainty and to avoid
having the courts redraft contracts for parties in a bid for fairness.

53
Q

CL fraud

A
  • Misrepresentation
  • Fraudulent
  • Negligent
    But for the deliberate representation intended to deceive
    (causal link) party would not have entered into the contract
54
Q

misrepresentation

A

Common law concept, It is A FALSE statement of fact has the effect of INDUCING a party to ENTER
into a contract.

55
Q

THREE ELEMENTS - In order to prove a misrepresentation.

A

− A false statement of past or existing fact has been made,
− The statement was made to the party bringing the court action.
− The statement had influenced the party bring the claim to enter into the
contract

56
Q

three types of misrepresentation

A

− Innocent: honestly made
− Negligent: honestly made, but ought to have known
− Fraudulent: knowing it was untrue or reckless as to truth

57
Q

types of misrepresentation, fields of law

A

civil law: fraud
common law: misrepresentation

58
Q

fraud (civil law)

A

Fraud
(With intention to deceive)
= Avoidance + Damages

59
Q

misrepresentation (common law)

A

Innocent Misrepresentation
Rescission OR Damages
Negligent Misrepresentation
= Rescission + Damages
Fraudulent Misrepresentation (with
intention to deceive)
= Rescission + Damages

60
Q

fraud art 3.44 DCC

A

Art 3:44 (1) A juridical act is voidable when it has been performed under the influence of fraud
* Art 3:44(3) Fraud is legally present when someone induces another
person to perform a juridical act by deliberately making an incorrect
statement, by deliberately concealing a fact that had to be revealed or
by another artifice.

61
Q

Threats (Civil Law) & Duress (Common Law)

A

DCC
* Art 3:44(2)
CL
* Duress
* Barton v. Armstrong
* Economic Duress
* Occidental Case

62
Q

DCC

A

district criminal court

63
Q

CL

A

common law