Contracts Flashcards

1
Q

Silence as Acceptance

A

Generally, an offeree cannot be forced to speak or have her silence treated as acceptance. However, if because of prior dealings or trade practices, it would be commercially reasonable for the offeror to consider silence an acceptance, the court may so find. Also, if the recipient of services knows or should have known that the services were being rendered with the expectation of compensation and, by a word, could have prevented the mistake, she may be held to have accepted the offer if she fails to speak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Unilateral v. Bilateral Contract

A

Unilateral Contract: exists only when an offeror makes acceptance possible only by performing a stipulated act.

Bilateral Contract: contemplates an exchange of promises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of Irrevocable Offers

A

(1) Option Contracts & Merchant’s Firm Offers; (2) Beginning Performance under a Unilateral Contract; (3) Detrimental Reliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Options & Merchant’s Firm Offers

A

Revocation: offers can be revoked at will by the offeror, even if he has promised not to revoke for a certain period, except with options contracts and a merchant’s firm offer

Options: an option is a distinct contract in which the offeree gives consideration for a promise

Merchant’s Firm Offer: under Art. 2, the following must be met for a merchant’s firm offer:
(i) if a merchant; (ii) offers to buy or sell goods in a signed writing; and (iii) the writing gives assurances that it will be held open

Note - when the court finds a merchant has made a firm offer, the offer is not revocable for lack of consideration during the time stated, or if no time stated, for a reasonable time (but in no event may such period exceed three months)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Unilateral Contract

A

Beginning Performance: an offer for a true unilateral contract becomes irrevocable once performance has begun (IN THE MANNER REQUESTED)

Note - the offeror must give the offeree a reasonable time to complete performance; & the offeree is not bound to complete performance - she may withdraw at any time prior to completion of performance, and there is no acceptance until performance is complete.

Distinguish - Preparations to Perform: substantial preparations to perform (as opposed to the beginning of performance) do not make the offer irrevocable but may constitute detrimental reliance sufficient to make the offeror’s promise binding to the extent of the detrimental reliance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Detrimental Reliance

A

When the offeror could reasonable expect that the offeree would rely to her detriment on the offer, and the offeree does so rely, the offer will be held irrevocable as an option contract for a reasonable length of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mailbox Rule

A

Acceptance by mail or similar means creates a contract at the moment of dispatch, provided that the mail is properly addressed and stamped, unless:
(i) the offer stipulates that acceptance is not effective until received; or (ii) an option contract is involved (an acceptance under an option contract is effect only upon receipt); (iii) if the offeree sends a rejection and then sends an acceptance, whichever arrives first is effective; (iv) if the offeree sends an acceptance and then a rejection, the acceptance is effective (i.e., the mailbox rule applies) unless the rejection arrives first and the offeror detrimentally relies on it.

Remember - The mailbox rule (“effective upon dispatch”) applies only to acceptance. It does not apply to other events in the contract setting, such as rejection or revocation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Statute of Frauds

A

MY LEGS
M - Marriage - A contract in anticipation of marriage

Y - Year - a contract not performable within 1 year (Note that a lifetime contract need not be in writing)

L - Land - Transfer of an interest in land (identity of parties, subject matter, consideration, and signature of the seller are required elements)

E - Executor - Executor contracts

G - Goods - Sale of Goods of $500 or more

S - Surety - A surety contract (a secondary promise to answer for the debt of another)

In most instances, an oral contract is valid. However, certain agreements, by statute, must be evidence by a writing signed by the party sought to be bound (breaching party). The Statute of Frauds requires a writing only for the sale contract and not for a revocation of the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Exceptions to Statute of Frauds

A

There are three situations in which contracts are enforceable without the writing requirements:
(i) Specially Manufactured Goods; (ii) Admissions in Pleadings or Court; or (iii) Payment or Delivery of Goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

SOF Exceptions #1 - Specially Manufactured Goods

A

If goods are to be specially manufactured for the buyer and are not suitable for sale to others by the seller in the ordinary course of his business, the contract is enforceable. To be enforceable, ONE of the following must be met:
(i) The seller has, under circumstances that reasonably indicate that the goods are for the buyer, made a substantial beginning in their manufacture
(ii) The seller made commitments for the buyer’s purchase before notice of repudiation is received

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SOF Exception #2 - Admissions in Pleadings or Court

A

If the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in pleadings, testimony, or otherwise in court that the contract for sale was made, the contract is enforceable without a writing (but in such a case the contract is not enforced beyond the quantity of goods admitted)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SOF Exception #3 - Payment or Delivery of Goods

A

If goods are either received and accepted or paid for, the contract is enforceable. However, the contract is not enforceable beyond the quantity of goos accepted or paid for.

Thus, if only some of the goods called for in the oral contract are accepted or paid for, the contract is only partially enforceable.

If an indivisible item is partially paid for, most courts hold that the SOF is satisfied for the whole item.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Specific Performance

A

Specific performance is allowed when the legal remedy (damages) would be inadequate, such as with contracts to purchase land, which is unique.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Capacity & Voidability

A

Legal Incapacity to Contract: Individuals in certain protected classes are legally incapable of incurring binding contractual obligations. Timely assertion of this defense by a promisor makes the contract voidable at his election.

Who is an Infant?: The age of majority in most jurisdictions is 18. However, in many states, married persons under age 18 are considered adults.

Effect of Infant’s Contract: Infants generally lack capacity to enter into a contract binding on themselves. However, contractual promises of an adult made to an infant are binding on the adult. In other words, a contract entered into between an infant and an adult is voidable by the infant but binding on the adult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Affirmance/Disaffirmance

A

On reaching majority, a minor may choose either to be bound by a contract by affirming it or to avoid the contract by disaffirming it. Generally, such a contract must be affirmed or disaffirmed as a whole; it cannot be affirmed in part and disaffirmed in part. If a contract is not disaffirmed shortly after the party reaches majority, it is considered affirmed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Remedies - Standard Measure of Damages

A

Compensatory Damages:
+ The usual goal of damages for breach of contract is to put the non-breaching party in the position she would have been in had the promise been performed.
+ Money is the general but limited tool by which this goal is accomplished.

“Standard Measure” of Damages - Expectation Damages
In most cases, the plaintiff’s standard measure of damages will be based on an “expectation” measure.
+ The “expectation” measure awards the plaintiff sufficient damages for her to buy a substitute performance
+ This is also known as “benefit of the bargain” damages

17
Q

Remedies - Consequential Damages

A

Consequential damages are special damages and reflect losses over and above standard expectation damages.
+ They arise because of the non-breaching party’s particular circumstances, and most often they consist of lost profits.
+ These damages may be recovered only if, at the time the contract was made, a reasonable person would have foreseen the damages as a probable result of a breach.
+ Therefore, to recover consequential damages, the breaching party must have known or had reason to know of the special circumstances giving rise to the damages.

Note - in contracts for the sale of goods, only a buyer may recover consequential damages

18
Q

Remedies - Incidental Damages

A

When do compensatory damages include incidental damages?
In contract for the sale of goods, compensatory damages may also include incidental damages.

Buyer - The buyer may claim incidental damages for the following when the buyer has rightfully rejected the seller’s breach: inspecting the goods, receiving the goods, transporting the goods, caring the goods, and custody of the goods.

Seller - The seller may claim incidental damages for the following when: storing the goods, shipping the goods, returning the goods, and reselling the goods.

19
Q

Unilateral Mistake

A

Unilateral mistakes arise most commonly when one party makes a mechanical error in computation. If only one of the parties is mistaken about facts relating to the agreement, the mistake will not precent formation of a contract. However, if the nonmistaken party knew or had reason to know of the mistake made by the other party, the contract is voidable by the mistaken party. As is the case with mutual mistake, for the contract to be voidable, the mistake must have a material effect on the agreed upon exchange and the mistaken party must not have borne the risk of the mistake. Materiality is determined by the overall impact on both parties. Ordinarily this is proven by showing the exchange is much less desirable to the mistaken party and more advantageous to the nonmistaken party.

20
Q

Modification under the UCC

A

At common law, a contract modification generally is unenforceable unless it is supported by new consideration. Art. 2 does not follow this rule. Under Art. 2, contract modifications sought in good faith are binding without consideration. A good faith modification is based on a legitimate commercial reason outside the control fo the party seeking the modification. Modifications extorted from the other party are in bad faith and are unenforceable.

21
Q

Additional Terms: Battle of the Forms

A

Art. 2 has abandoned the mirror image rule, providing instead that the proposal of additional or different terms by the offeree in a definite and timely acceptance does not constitute a rejection and counteroffer, but rather is effective as an acceptance, unless the acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.

22
Q

Merchants & Non-Merchants - Additional or Different Terms

A

Merchants -
If both parties to the contract are merchants, additional terms in the acceptance will be included in the contract unless any ONE of the following are present:
(i) They materially alter the original terms of the offer (e.g., they change a party’s risk or the remedies available)
(ii) The offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer
(iii) The offeror has already objected to the particular terms, or objects within a reasonable time after notice of them is received

Non-Merchants -
If any party to the contract is not a merchant, the additional or different terms are considered to be mere proposals to modify the contract that do not become part of the contract unless the offeror expressly agrees.