Contracts Flashcards
Applicable Law: Common Law
- Services Contracts; and
2. Real Estate
Applicable Law: UCC
- Sale of Goods
Applies to both merchants and individuals
Applicable Law: Mixed Contracts - Primary Purpose
Is contract primarily for goods or services?
Applicable Law: Mixed Contracts - Divisibility
Divisibility
May apply Common Law or UCC to different aspects of a contract if contract can be broken up into mini deals
Contract Formation (3) OAC
- Offer
- Acceptance
- Consideration
Creating Legal Offer - (3) ObSV
- Objective Test - Reasonable person believe you intended to enter into a contract
- Directed at specific person
- Vest power of acceptance in offeree (say “I accept” and you gucci)
Specificity - Common Law
All essential terms must be in agreement
- Price
- Quantity
- Parties
- Duration
- Subject
Specificity - UCC
Only essential term:
- Quantity
Requirements Contract
Buyer does not know how much is required, but promises only to buy from you
- Quantity still satisfied; “all we need”
Output Contract
Seller does not now how much they will output, but promises only to see to you
- Quantity still satisfied; “all we will produce”
Methods of Revocation (6) RC RC DR
- Revoke
- Constructive Revocation
- Reject
- Counteroffer
- Death
- Reasonable Time
Requirements / Definition: Revocation
- Express communication to offeree of withdrawing offer
Requirements / Definition: Constructive Revocation
- When offeror does something that is absolutely inconsistent with continuing the ability to contract
Contract to buy house, but sells to someone else - without property, there is no more contract
Requirements / Definition: Rejection
- Express communication to offeror of rejecting offer
Requirements / Definition: Death
- Offeror dies before acceptance
Note: if valid contract formed before death, successors must honor obligations
Requirements / Definition: Reasonable Time
- Reasonable time passes, offer automatically is revoked
Revival
Offerors always have the discretion to revive dead offers
Irrevocable Offer Types (4) CLO, UCC, UC, DR
- Common Law Option
- UCC Firm Offer
- Unilateral Contract w/ partial performance
- Detrimental Reliance
Requirements / Definition: Common Law Option (3) OTC
- Offer to contract
- Time
- Consideration
Requirements / Definition: UCC Firm Offer (3) MST
- Both parties merchants
- Signed writing by offeror
- Time
Time not to exceed 3 months - to keep open further, must have consideration –> conversion to CL Option
Unilateral Contract w/ Partial Performance
Offer irrevocable once performance has begun
Detrimental Reliance / Promissory Estoppel
Offer irrevocable once counterparty has taken action to their detriment in reliance on the promise
Construction / Subcontractor bidding is clearest example
Acceptance - Test, Master
Objective Test
Offeror is Master of Acceptance - Offeree must comply
Unilateral Offer
Invites acceptance through performance
Bilateral Offer
Invites acceptance through promise
Ambiguous Offer
Either performance or promise will suffice
Definition / Requirements: Open to All Offer
- To collect on a reward, you must know about the reward
Definition / Requirements: Acceptance (1)
- Must be communicated to offeror
Mailbox Rule
- There is a binding contract once an Acceptance is sent
Mailbox Rule does not apply to: (4)
- Rejection, Counteroffer
- Revocation
- Option
- Fax, Email?
Mailbox Rule - Acceptance mailed first, then phone call rejecting
Acceptance controls
Mailbox Rule - Acceptance mailed first, mail lost
Acceptance controls
Mailbox Rule - Acceptance mailed first, Rejection then mailed
Acceptance controls, unless counterparty detrimentally relied on rejection
Mailbox Rule - Rejection mailed first, Acceptance mailed
Whatever is opened first controls
Acceptance by Silence - Permitted When (5)
- Unilateral reward (inefficient to communicate Acceptance)
- Geographic proximity (you can see them perform)
- Past history of Accepting through silence
- Acceptance by silence is specific and offeree intends to accept by silence
- Implied in Fact Contracts
Implied in Fact Contracts
Acceptance inferred through actions
Hanging around barbershop
Acceptance / Counteroffer - Common Law
Mirror Image Rule
Acceptance must match terms of the contract exactly
Non-conformity is considered counteroffer
Acceptance / Counteroffer - Common Law; Conditional Acceptance
At Common Law, constitutes counteroffer
Acceptance / Counteroffer - UCC
UCC 2-207; non-conforming acceptance may constitute acceptance
Not all non-conforming terms will control
UCC 2-207 (1) - Acceptance (3)
- Acceptance must be seasonable; reasonable time
- Cannot condition acceptance upon nonconforming terms
- Must be for the same contract (chainsaw vs hand saw)
UCC 2-207 (2) - Nonconforming Terms (4) MMEO
- Both parties merchants;
- New terms do not materially alter the deal;
- Initial offer does not expressly limit acceptance to its terms; and
- Offeror does not reject within reasonable time to new terms
UCC 2-207 (3) - No Contract
In case of no contract but parties continue on:
Only terms parties agreed to become part of the contract
Knockout Rule - Minority vs Majority
Minority Rule - Initial terms control
Majority Rule - Conflicting terms all knock out
UCC 2-207 - Confirming Memo; (4) Analysis
If there is a confirming memo with new terms, examine:
- Both parties merchants;
- New terms do not materially alter the deal;
- Initial offer does not expressly limit acceptance to its terms; and
- Offeror does not reject within reasonable time to new terms
Generally unlikely that the new terms control
Consideration / Bargained For Consideration
Parties exchange benefit or detriment
Not doing something you are legally entitled to do constitutes consideration
Gifts / Conditional Gifts - Consideration?
No
Adequacy of Consideration
Consideration must be nominal
Pretense does not suffice
Value matters - economics is not dispositive; as long as a party wants something, this constitutes nominal value
Illusory Promise
When performance is controlled exclusively at a party’s discretion
Unenforceable
Satisfaction Contracts
Contracts which state fulfillment upon a party’s satisfaction
Enforceable
Past Consideration - Consideration?
No
Promising not to Sue (2)
Constitutes consideration if:
- Plaintiff has good faith basis for the claim; or
- There is reason to doubt validity of the claim
Contract Modification - Common Law
Preexisting Duty Rule
A promise to do something you already promised to do does not constitute consideration
For modification, need new consideratoin
Contract Modification - Common Law - Exceptions (3)
- Change in performance;
- Third party promising to fulfill; or
- Unforeseen difficulties which excuse performance
Contract Modification - Common Law - Partial Debt Payment
Partial payment of debt to satisfy debt obligation is enforceable only if the debt is not currently due
Contract Modification - UCC
Requires only good faith
No consideration required
Promissory Estoppel / Reliance
Occurs when a party makes a promise and the other party takes an action in reliance of that promise
Definition / Requirements: Promissory Estoppel / Reliance (3) RDI
- A promise is made to reasonably induce reliance;
- Promisee takes detrimental action in reliance of that promise; and
- Injustice can only be avoided by enforcing promise
Definition / Requirements: Quasi-Contract (3) MPU
- Plaintiff confers measurable benefit on defendant;
- Plaintiff has reasonable expectation of compensation; and
- Unjust to to let defendant keep benefit without paying
Damages limited to fair value of benefit conferred
Moral Obligation + Subsequent Promise
Minority rule
You were saved and promised to pay for rescue - enforceable in minority jurisdictions
Seal
Has no binding force
Contract Defenses (7) MIMFDIU
- Misunderstanding
- Incapacity
- Mistake
- Fraud / Misrep / Nondisclosure
- Duress
- Illegality
- Unconscionability
Misunderstanding (3)
- Both parties use a material term that is open to two or more reasonable interpretations;
- Each side attaches a different meaning to the term; and
- Neither party knows or should know of the confusion
Incapacity (3) / Contract for Necessity
- Minors
- Mentally impaired
- Intoxicated
Incapacitated party may void
Contract for Necessity - pay fair value for necessities exchanged
Mistake
A belief not in accord with present fact
Mutual Mistake (3)
- There is a mistake of fact, existing at the time the deal is made;
- The mistake relates to the basic assumption of the contract and has a material impact on the deal; and
- The impacted party did not bear the risk of mistake
Unilateral Mistake (2.5)
May rescind if:
- Prove all elements of mutual mistake; and
2a. The mistake would make the contract unconscionable; or
2b. The other side knew of, or had reason to know of, or cause the mistake
Misrepresentation (3)
A statement that is untrue at the time of contracting
- Misrepresentation of present fact;
- That is material or intentional; and
- Made under circumstances in which it is justifiable to rely on the representation
Fraud
Intentional representation
Fraud in the Execution
Tricking someone to sign something that they did not know is a contract
Nondisclosure
Normally you do not need to disclose all material facts of a deal
Nondisclosure - Breach (2)
- Fiduciary Relationship; or
2. Actvice concealment
Duress
Improper threat that deprives a party of meaningful choice
Undue Influence
Use of high pressure tactics to overcome more susceptible party
Illegality
Unenforceable
Illegality - In Furtherance Exception
Contracts made in furtherance of an illegal act is not illegal
Cab ride to assassination is not illegal - although hit is
Less guilty party may recover restitution
Contracts Against Public Policy
Unenforceable, although may not technically be illegal
Unconscionability - 2 Types
Shocks the conscience
- Procedural
- Substantive
Procedural Unconscionability
A defect in the bargaining process
Substantive Unconscionability
Substance of the contract is a rip off
Statute of Frauds
Certain contracts are required to be committed to writing
Statute of Frauds - Contract Types (5) MSOUR
- Marriage
- Suretyship
- Outside 1 year
- UCC +$500
- Real Estate
Statute of Frauds - Main Purpose Exception
Statue of Frauds will not apply if a contract was entered into for a surety’s benefit
The surety will have benefitted from the contract and so the injured party may not sue them - go after the gurantor
Statute of Frauds - Real Estate
Only real estate contracts that transfer title are subject to the Statute of Frauds
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction (2)
- Writing; or
2. Performance
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction - Common Law - Services Contract within 1 Year
Full performance by either side satisfies Statute of Frauds
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction - Common Law - Writing Signed by Party Against Whom Rights are Asserted (3)
Signed writing against party whom the rights are being enforced
- Show contract has been made;
- Identifies parties;
- Contain essential elements
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction - Common Law - Real Estate (2) (2/3)
- Signed writing; or
- Partial performance if 2/3 are met:
- Possession;
- Payment; or
- Improvements to the Property
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction - UCC - Sale of Goods - Signed Writing
Signed writing will satisfy;
- No need to mention price;
- Must mention quantity
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction - UCC - Sale of Goods - Partial Performance
Partial performance satisfies the Statute of Frauds, but only for the amount delivered and accepted
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction - UCC - Custom Made Goods Exception
If goods are custom made, Statute of Frauds is satisfied once counterparty has undertaken a substantial beginning
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction - UCC - Judicial Admission
Statement made in pleading or during testimony
Statute of Frauds - Satisfaction - UCC - Confirming Memo
If both parties are merchants, confirming memo satisfies if it is not rejected
Statute of Frauds - Equal Dignity Rule
Signed writing is needed to authorize an agent to act on your behalf
Statute of Frauds - Subjecting Modification to the Statute of Frauds
Modified contracts are only subject to the Statute of Frauds if the the deal as modified is subject to the rule
Parol-Evidence Rule
Once a contract is fully integrated, any previous oral discussions or writings are not part of the deal
PER does not apply to subsequent modifications after the contract has been fully integrated
Full Integration
Contract expresses all terms of the agreement
Partial Integration
There is a final writing, but not all terms are included
Merger Clause - Identify Integration
Merger clauses within contracts state the contract is fully integrated
Natural Omission
Courts will examine whether a term would naturally be omitted from a contract
If so, then may be admissible
Parol-Evidence Rule - UCC
UCC assumes partial integration of all contracts
Unless parties would have certainly included a disputed term in writing
Parol-Evidence Rule - UCC Exception (3)
- Will not bar evidence of defense;
- Even with fully integrated deals, a party may introduce evidence of a separate deal
- Even with fully integrated deals, a party may introduce evidence of prior communications relating to defining an ambiguous term
Warranties (2)
Promise about a term of the contract that shifts risk to promise-making party
Warranties may be disclaimed
Express Warranty
A promise that affirms of describes goods and is in part of the bargain, or a sample of the goods sold, constitutes an express warranty
Implied Warranty of Merchantability
A merchant, dealing in goods they normally sell, warrants the goods sold are fit for ordinary commercial purposes
May be disclaimed - must be conspicuous
Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose
When a buyer relies on a seller’s expertise that a good will be used for a special purpose
Nonmerchants, such as salespeople, can warrant a good’s fitness
Can disclaim, must be in writing
Conditions (2)
Shift risk of parties if something in the future happens
Express or Implied
Express Conditions
Created by language of the contract
Must be strictly satisfied
Satisfaction Conditions - 2 Methods
Contract is enforceable per the satisfaction of counterparty
Objective Test - If most reasonable people would be satisfied
Subjective Test - for aesthetic executions, like art
Condition Waiver (2)
- Conditions may be waived by words or conduct
2. Wrongful interference or hindrance
Implied Conditions - Constructive Condition of Exchange
One party’s performance is conditioned on another party’s performance
Common Law - Performance - Doctrine of Substantial Performance
A party will satisfy the Constructive Condition of Exchange if no material breach has occurred
Breach must not be willful
Recovery - CCE Minor Breach
Parties injured by minor breach may recover:
- Cost of completion; or
- Diminution of market value
Recovery - CCE Major Breach
No recovery on contract, but maybe quasi-contract
Recovery - Breach of Express Contract, Quasi Contract Recovery
Usually not
Divisibility - Substantial Performance?
If a contract is clearly divisible, then the deal will be broken up to determine whether there has been substantial performance
Performance - UCC (2)
- Perfect Tender
- Perfect Delivery
Performance is the one time the UCC is more stringent than the Common Law
Elements: Perfect Tender
- Perfect Goods
- Perfect Delivery
Installment Contracts not subject to Perfect Tender
Nonconforming Performance - Revocation of Acceptance
Buyer may revoke acceptance when goods seemed okay on delivery but a defect is found within a reasonable time
Seller’s Right to Cure (2)
If seller fails Perfect Tender, seller may cure if:
- There is time left on the contract; or
- The seller has reasonable grounds to accept nonconforming delivery
Delivery
Delivery is assumed to be a one time delivery
Delivery - Installment Contracts
Goods can be delivered in lots / installments over a period of time
Delivery - Installment Rejections
A buyer may reject a nonperfect installment delivery if there is substantial impairment in the shipment that cannot be cured
Methods of Delivery (3)
- Tender at Seller’s Place of Business
- Shipment Contract
- Delivery Contract
Tender at Seller’s Place of Business
Seller gives goods to buyer
Shipment Contract (3)
Requires seller:
- Get goods to common carrier;
- Make an arrangement for delivery; and
- Notify buyer
Destination Contract (2)
Requires seller:
- Deliver goods to buyer;
- Notify buyer
Risk of Loss Analysis (4)
- If risk of loss has been dealt with in contract, contract controls
- With breach, breaching party bears loss
- No breach, examine shipment type
- No breach, is seller merchant
Risk of Loss - Shipment Contract
Risk of Loss - Buyer
Risk of Loss - Destination Contract
Risk of Loss - Seller
Risk of Less - Merchant (2)
If Merchant: Risk of Loss stays with seller until buyer receives goods
If Not Merchant: Risk of Loss stays with buyer when seller tenders goods
Excuse (5) IIDFM
- Impracticability
- Impossibility
- Death
- Frustration of Purpose
- Modification / Cancellation
Impossibility (3)
Performance excused if impossible:
Illegality
Subject matter is destroyed
Special person dies
Impracticability
Ability to perform is very difficult
Economic cost not dispositive
Death
Death after contracting does not excuse obligations
However, if there is a special interest in having one person perform and they die, performance is excused
Frustration of Purpose
If the purpose for the contract is undermined
Like watching royal wedding, but was cancelled
Modification / Cancellation
May walk away if both sides have remaining performance
Accord and Satisfaction
Parties agree that performance of an earlier contract will be changed to a new type of performance
New Performance = Accord
Excusal of Initial Performance = Satisfaction
Novation
When both parties agree that a substitute person will take over contractual obligations
With valid Novation, original promisor no longer has obligations
Anticipatory Repudiation (2)
- Clear; and
- Unequivocal
statement to counterparty that you will not honor your contractual obligations
Anticipatory Repudiation - Post-Repudiation Action (2.5)
- Sue immediately; or
- Wait and demand performance
- If only payment is pending, must wait until contract time is up, then sue
Anticipatory Repudiation - Retraction (2)
Retraction permitted if:
- Counterparty has not initiated lawsuit; or
- Counterparty has not detrimentally relied on repudiation
Anticipatory Repudiation - UCC - Adequate Assurance of Performance
Under the UCC, buyers can request an AAP from seller
If there is no response within reasonable time, silence constitutes repudiation
Expectation Damages
Seeks to put party in economic position they would have been had contract been honored
Contract Value w/ Breach vs Contract Value w/o Breach
Expectation Damages - Limits (3)
- Reasonably certain calculation;
- Only general damages or foreseeable consequential damages;
- Duty to Mitigate
Reasonably Certain Damages Calc
Expectation Damages must be calculated with reasonable certainty
Speculative damages will be left out
General Damages
Recoverable, the types of losses anyone would suffer
Foreseeable Consequential Damages
Recoverable, losses only this particular person would suffer
Unforeseeable Consequential Damages
Unrecoverable unless breaching party had reason to believe such losses were possible at the time of contracting
Mitigation
Breached against party has duty to reduce the amount of damages suffered on account of the breach
Mitigation efforts must be reasonably similar to original contract
Lost Volume Profits
Recovering lost sales - you could have had two, but only sold one
Recover the profits you would have otherwise earned
Incomplete Performance Recovery
If there is a breach, performing party must stop their performance
Cannot complete the building just to run up damages
Contract Price - (Amount Already Paid - Amount Needed to Finish)
Economic Waste / Diminution of Market Value
How much lower the market value is of what you got vs what you expected
Reliance Damages
Seeks to put a party in the same economic situation they would have been in had the contract never been entered into
Restitution
Provide the plaintiff the equal amount of economic value conferred to the defendant
Liquidated Damages (2)
Provided expressly in contract
Requires:
- Amount of liquidated damages was reasonable at the time of contracting; and
- Actual damages from breach would be difficult to calculate
Punitive Damages
Never awarded
Specific Performance (2)
Awarded only when monetary damages are insufficient to compensate
- Common Law - presumed unavailable for service contracts
2, UCC - Only available for unique goods
Right of Reclamation (3)
Arises when buyer becomes insolvent
- Buyer is insolvent at time they receive goods;
- Seller must demand goods within 10 days of receipt or within reasonable time of insolvency notice from buyer; and
- Buyer still has goods
Intended Beneficiary
Intended to have been conveyed contractual rights
Has right to sue
Incidental Beneficiary
No right to sue
Creditor Beneficiary
Third Party Beneficiary in a deal where promisee agrees to pay a prior debt from the promisor
Donee Beneficiary
No clear obligation, but promisee clearly intends to confer a gift of enforcement to Third Party
Revoking Third Party Rights (4)
May bar revocation based on promissory estoppel or:
- Beneficiary detrimentally relied on rights;
- Beneficiary manifests intent to the contract; or
- Beneficiary filed lawsuit to enforce contract
Assignment
Transfer of rights under a contract
Delegation
Transfer of duties under a contract
Assignment Scope
Generally, all rights my be assigned, in whole or in part, unless expressly prohibited in contract
Prohibition of Assignment
If you assign this is a breach, and counterparty any recover
Invalidation of Assignment
If you assign there is a breach, and counterparty cannot recover since there was no right to assign to begin with
Assignment without Consideration
Last assignment will generally control
Assignment with Consideration
First assignment for consideration controls
Delegation
Generally okay unless:
- There is special interest in having a specific party execute; or
- Not prohibited by contract
Delegation with Consideration
Creates liability
UCC Auction
When lots constitute separate sales
Auction - Completing Sales
Auctioneer announces end
For simultaneous end and bid, Auctioneer reserves discretion to continue
Reserve Auction
Auctioneer may withdraw goods at any time
Non-Reserve Auction
Goods cannot be withdrawn unless no bid has been received within a reasonable time