CONTRACT TERMS Flashcards
PAROL EVIDENCE RULE
Keeps out evidence of a prior or contemporaneous agreement (oral or written) that CONTRADICTS a later WRITING
4 EXCEPTIONS TO THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE
EVIDENCE COMES IN IF OFFERED TO:
(1) Correct a clerical error
(2) Establish a defense against formation
- Ask if what is being introduced is being introduced to “rewrite” the K
(3) Interpret a vague or ambiguous term
(4) Supplement/add to a PARTIALLY integrated writing
PARTIALLY INTEGRATED WRITING
A final statement of terms INCLUDED, but not a complete statement of ALL terms agreed to
-Partially integrated writings may be supplemented by proving up consistent additional terms
MERGER CLAUSES
e. g. “K is limited to the terms herein”
- Indicate completely integrated documents, cannot be supplemented
UNDER ARTICLE 2:
-Only merger clauses keep out parol evidence
SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS & THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE
Parol evidence has NOTHING to do with what happens AFTER an agreement is reduced to writing
-These are MODIFICATION issues
CONDUCT AS GAP FILLERS
(in order of importance)
(1) Course of Performance
- What these parties did under this K
(2) Course of Dealing
- What did these parties do under prior K’s with each other?
(3) Usage of Trade
- What do others in the trade do under similar K’s?
EXPRESS WARRANTIES
-Include statements of fact, descriptions of the good, and use of samples/models
- In order to be actionable, MUST be a basis of the bargain
- i.e. if the buyer could have relied on the express warranty
IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY
- Goods are fit for their ordinary purpose
- Seller MUST be a merchant who deals in goods of the kind
- e.g. specialized knowledge about the particular goods involved in the transaction
IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
-Goods are fit for the buyer’s particular purpose
(1) Seller MUST KNOW buyer has a special use for the goods, AND
(2) That buyer is relying on the seller to pick out goods suitable for that use
-Seller does NOT have to be a specialized merchant
WARRANTIES OF A LESSOR IN A LEASE OF GOODS (ARTICLE 2A)
Lessors of goods can make the same warranties under Article 2 as sellers under Article 2
EXCEPT: finance leases
SELLER’S ABILITY TO DISCLAIM WARRANTIES (ARTICLE 2 AND 2A)
- Sellers can disclaim IMPLIED warranties, NOT express warranties
- Need magic words
e. g. “merchantability” or “as is” or “with all faults” - Otherwise disclaimer must be conspicuous
LIMITATION OF BUYER’S REMEDIES (ARTCLE 2 AND 2A)
RULE: Seller can limit buyer’s remedies for breach of any warranty (implied or express) as long as the limitation is not unconscionable
-i.e. Limiting buyer’s remedies for personal injury is PRESUMED unconscionable
RISK OF LOSS HIERARCHY
(1) Agreement of the parties
(2) Breach
- Breaching party bears ROL, even if loss and breach are unrelated
(3) Delivery by common carrier
- ROL shifts to buyer when seller completes delivery obligations
(4) Non-Carrier
SHIPMENT CONTRACT
- Seller must get goods to a common carrier, make delivery arrangements, and notify buyer
- The above completes seller’s delivery obligations and ROL shifts to buyer
DESTINATION CONTRACT
- Seller must get goods to a specific destination (usually where buyer is located)
- ROL passes to buyer at named location
- FOB
- If FOB city is where the seller is located, Shipment K
- If FOB city is anywhere else, destination K