Contract - Terms Flashcards
Schawel v Reade
If it was the statement maker’s intention to guarantee the truth of the statement it could be deemed as a term
Ecay v Godfrey
If one party needs to question the validity of a statement made by the other party as to a term it is likely to be a representation
Bannerman v White
If particular emphasis was placed on a criteria, the other party should be aware of its importance and so it should be used as a term
Oscar Chess
If they are not an expert in their area their statements are likely representations
Dick Bentley Productions
If they are an expert in their area they have a higher onus on them to find out the truth
How can a term be incorporated into the contract?
- Signature
- Notice
- Reference
- Common dealings
L’Estrange v Graucob rule and exception (incl. case)
You are bound by what you sign EXCEPT from when it is a misrepresentation (Curtis Chemical Cleaning)
Grogan v Robin (Signature)
The document you sign must be a contractual document
Notice
Parties should be given notice as to when a term is incorporated into a contract and the term must appear in the contractual document
Notice cases (2 cases)
- Parker v Southeastern Railway
- Chapelton v Barry
Olley v Marlborough Court; Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking
Terms cannot be incorporated into the contract after it has been made
Impala Warehousing (reference)
Terms can be incorporated if it was on the contractual document for a period of time
Sterling Hydraulics (reference)
It must be clear as to where the proposed terms are in the contractual document
McCutcheon v David (Common dealings)
Previous dealings are only capable of being incorporated into contract if constructive knowledge of the term is established and the parties assent to them
Hollier v Rambler Motors (Common dealings)
A term may be incorporated into a contract by common dealings if it has been consistent across the course of the dealing
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking; Interphoto Picture Library
The more onerous the term is, the more attention that should be brought to it
Interpretation - Rainy Sky
In determining what the parties meant by a term, think about what a reasonable person would have understood the parties to have meant
Can courts correct contracts? (incl. 2 cases)
- The court can correct the contract (Shauler v Wickman)
- It corrects linguistic mistakes not a bad bargain (Arnold v Britton)