Contract Remedies: Specific Situations: Personal Services Contracts Flashcards
What general issues arise with regards to personal services contracts and remedies?
- What remedies are available for personal service K’s
- damages
- restitution
- specific performance - Enforcement of Negative Covenants
- During Term of Employment
- After Term of Employment
In general, what remedies may be available for personal service K’s?
- damages
- restitution
- specific performance
With regards to MONEY DAMAGES, what are the damages if
- an employee breaches?
- an employer breaches?
If EE breaches –> ER recovers cost of obtaining replacement
If ER breaches –> EE gets:
[wages promises] LESS [avoidable damages]
NOTE –> if wrongful dismissal is tortious, EE may recover lost wages, emotional distress, and punitive damages
With regards to RESTITUTION, what are the damages if
- an employer breaches?
- an employee breaches?
IF ER breaches –> EE is entitled to REASONABLE VALUE of services, even above K price
IF EE breaches –>
- ER can get restitution of PAID but UNEARNED wages
- Breaching EE can get value of services rendered (limited by contract rate) less ER’s damages
What issue arises with regards to “negative covenants during term of employment K”?
- Usually, this refers to EE’s promise not to work for anyone else during K term
- Courts WILL enforce this
NOTE –> covenant WILL be implied if EE promised full time or exclusive services
Issues:
- Requirements
- Defenses
What are the requirements for court to enforce EE’s promise not to work for anyone else during K term?
- Inadequacy of damages (ie..service must be unique)
- feasibility (HOWEVER, this is not a problem in this case)
- conditions to EE’s employment must be satisfied (ie.. employer must furnish proper place to work and pay promised wages)
- no defenses
NOTE –> some courts require “independent significance” of covenant (ie.. breach would cause ER harm beyond that caused by breach of the affirmative covenant)
What are the defenses to negative covenant during term of employment K (covenant not to work for someone else)?
- include all defenses against specific performance
NOTE –> argument that EE is prevented from earning a living is not enough
HOWEVER –> injunction will be dissolved if ER is not “ready, willing, and able” to accept D’s performance
What issues arise with regards to “negative covenants after termination of employment” (covenant not to compete)?
Scenario –> clause in employment agreement (or sale of business) that require EE not to compete for a period following employment
ISSUES:
- when are damages an adequate remedy
- when is injunctive relief appropriate?
With regards to a covenant not to compete (following employment) - when are damages an adequate remedy?
Damage = adequate IF —> EE’s services are ordinary
Damages NOT adequate IF –>
- EE’s services are UNIQUE; or
- TRADE SECRETS or GOODWILL are involved
With regards to covenant not to compete (following employment) - when is an injunction appropriate?
- damages are inadequate; AND
- restriction is REASONABLE in TIME and SPACE and no broader than necessary to protect the ER
NOTE –> courts are less likely to find “REASONABLENESS” if restriction bans EE from competing after termination
What happens if a covenant not to compete is over broad?
Some Courts (“Blue Pencil Rule”) –> allows over broad covenant to be enforced to extent reasonable
Other courts –> hold such covenants VOID as ILLEGAL RESTRAINT of TRADE
With regards to a covenant not to compete - do liquidated damages preclude injunctive relief?
No