Contract Of Agency Flashcards
2 situations when ratification will not be allowed
- No valid ratification can be made by a person whose knowledge of the facts of the case is materially defective
- Ratification will have the effect of subjecting a third person to damages or of terminating any right or interest of the third person
Rules governing ratification
- Contract mst be made by the agent on account of the principal and not on account of himself
- Principal must be in existence at the time of act ( not a newly formed company- b4 it’s incorporation)
- Void Abnitio no R
- P can ratify only if at the time of ratification he himself could have done the act. ( insure for an already sunken ship)
- Express or implied
- No if knowledge of facts materially defective
- Ratification pertains to the whole of the transaction
- No if affecting the right of third party or damages
- When time limited- within that time
- When no time limit - within reasonable time
- Ratification is retrospective in effect
3 cases when agent is personally liable
- When the contract is made by the agent for the sale or purchase of goods for a merchant resident abroad
- When the agent doesn’t disclose the name of principal
- When p is diclosed but cannot be sued
Other cases
- Agency coupled with interest
- when the contract so provides
- Fixed by usage
- Without and beyond authority
- Fraud in matter beyond his authority
- Pretends
- Promoters of a company intended to be but in fact not yet
2 sections for liabilty of a pretended agent
S 235 - untruly represents himself as agent - compensation or damage
236- 3rd party rt to compensation but has no rt to compel the performance of a contract
Case or pretended agent
Collen vs wright
If honest- breach of warranty of authority
If knowingly- sue for deciet
test of agency
- lord herchel observed in Kennedy vs DeTafford- abused
- Has he any power to represent the principal, ie making the principal answerable to 3rd person
- Dinbai Wadia vs Farukh - test is not of physical control but right to control. If the principal has rt to control the agent wrt that act
- Terminology used - no matter- “ agent” in contract, but not so in eyes of law if real relation is that of principal and principal
Agency coupled with interest - 3 key points
- Sec 202
- Agent himself has interest in the property which forms the subject matter of agency , cannot be revoked unless an express contract to the contrary
- Agents interest should be a substantial one and such that agency cannot be revoked without causing loss to the agent . In such cases revocation of contract would be equivalent to breach of faith against the agent
- Mere prospect of remuneration is not INTEREST under this section
A gives b authority to sell land.. Pay himself the debts due to him from a
Agents duty to principle
- Direction, custom
- Reasonable diligence, skill
- Difficulty- communicate, direction.
- Hide material fact, disadvantage
- Pricipal had right to claim benifits from hidden business transaction
- Proper accounts
Contracts where principal is undisclosed
Where agent has authority but doesn’t disclose agency
- Enforceable by/ against agent
- 3rd person may sue at his option either p or a and conversely
But the rt of UP to sue 3 rd party - 3 limitations
- Authority of agent must have existed at the time of the contract
- if The personality of the agent in the circumstances a matter of vital importance , then p not allowed to intervene
- Met with all the defences of the 3 rd party against agent
Contract of agency - husband and wife
- Generally not. But via contract, holding out , ratification
- Liable for wife’s debt only if he has given E or I sanctioned what wife dues
Presumption of agency - goods for household purpose
- Wife agent of necessity - pledge husbands debt for necessities of life
- When lives apart for no fault of husband
But liable to tradesman who was induced to deal with wife, failure of husband to give due notice
Liablity of subagent towards principal is not direct, except in case of fraud and wilful wrong
- Delegatus non potest delegare-
Rule embodied in sec 190- cannot lawfully employ another ..unless
- custom - may
- nature - must - Rationale - confidence in the honesty and working capacity of agent
- Principal and subagent
- when properly appointed - responsible for and represented by
- when not properly appointed - p not reperesented or responsible for acts of SA, SA not responsible to P unless for fraud and wilful wrong, agent repository both to p and 3rd party - Summan Singh vs NC bank of new York
Directed NC bank to transfer money to a particular person. Bank instructed its Bombay branch. Bombay bank appointed Punjab national bank to do the act. PNB delivered money to wrong person. Plaintiffs action against pnb failed on the principle that SA not liable to P - In case of fraud and wilful wrong plaintiff can bring action against the SA ( nensukdas vs birdichand )
Section for substituted agent
194
Points of comparison between agency by ratification vs agency by estoppel
- Act of principal
- Knowledge of principal
- Authority of agent at the time of action
- Time when principle is bound
Sections dealing with ratification
196-200
Effect of ratification
Ratification relates back to contract of agency ie its retrospective in effect.
Write the case of BOLTON vs LAMBERT. Is b entitled to specific performance. Bs ratifiction relates back to the moment A and C signed the contract. Hence As revocation is inoperative