Contract Law - Terms (1) Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

A condition is said to go to the root of the contract.

A

Poussard v Spiers and Pond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

There is no right for the unjured party to repudiate the contract in a warranty is breached.

A

Bettini v Gye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Innominate term - many terms in contracts are not clearly either a condition or warranty until the breach of that term has occurred.

A

Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co. Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The importance attached to the representation - where the statement is obviously important to the contract, it will be seen as a term of the contract.

A

Couchman v Hill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Special knowledge or skill of the person making the statement.

A

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith Motors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Time lag - where a contract is made later and does not refer to the statement, it is likely that the statement does not become a term of the contract.

A

Routledge v Mackay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Business efficacy test.

A

The Moorcock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Officious Bystander Test - Terms will not be implied if the parties would have never have agreed to them had they thought about them.

A

Shell UK Ltd v Lostock Garage Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Officious Bystander Test - Reasonableness is to be judged objectively, in considering what the parties would have agreed.

A

Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sometimes terms may be implied by custom.

A

Hutton v Warren

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The prior conduct of the parties my indicate terms to be implied. `

A

Hillas v Arcos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly