Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Law Sem 1, Yr1 > Contract Law > Flashcards

Contract Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

Contract

A

An agreement giving rise to obligations which are enforced or recognised by law… based on the agreement of the contracting parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Agreement

A

The meeting of minds between contracting parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Obligations

A

Voluntarily assumed
Recognised and enforced by law
Reciprocal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What must there be for a valid contract

A
  • An agreement
  • Consideration
  • Intention to create legal relations
  • Certainty of terms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Common misconceptions abt contracts

A
  • Do not always need to be written
  • Can be oral
  • Often do not always need to be signed
  • Do not need to be fair, equal or reasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why we need contracts

A

Enforcement reasons
Safeguarding of parties
Reliance
Allocate risks
Executory performances security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ITCLR

A

Intention to create legal relations (for a contract)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the rebuttal presumption for social and domestic arrangements

A

There is no intention to create legal relations in a domestic or social arrangement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Social and domestic arrangement case example

A

Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571
Money £30 a month to wife
Stopped after divorce but had no limit
Contract or no contract?
Trial judge said was a contract
Court of Appeal said no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the presumption for commercial arrangements

A

There is a ITCLR
Can be rebutted by evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the objective approach

A

Focuses on the outward expressions and actions of the parties involved, rather than their internal intentions or beliefs
Grounded in the principle that contracts should be assessed based on what a reasonable person would understand from the words and conduct of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social and domestic arrangements: Rebutting the presumption that was no ITCLR

A

Where the parties separated prior to making the agreement
Where there is an element of commercial dealings between the parties
Where parties have acted to their detriment or where the agreement has been executed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Commercial arrangements: rebutting presumption that was an ITCLR

A

Expressing stipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the existence of an agreement is determined by

A

Ascertaining the objective intentions of the parties when looking at the words and conduct of the parties from the perspective of a ‘reasonable person’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Traditional approach to ascertaining whether parties have come to agreement

A

Offer and acceptance approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is finding there is actual agreement important

A
  • Required for a valid contract
  • Point at which rights and obligations begin
  • Basis for contractual obligations
  • Tells us when (and where) a contract has been formed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Offer and acceptance approach

A

Offer?
- There must be sufficient certainty and intention to be bound
- Otherwise could be an invitation to treat

Acceptance?
- Must match the offer and (usually) be communicated

The agreement is made at the point of valid acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Objective approach to intention

A

How a reasonable person would interpret a defendant’s actions, rather than the defendant’s subjective state of mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Offer and acceptance approach structure

A

Invitation to treat (if applicable)
Offer
Counter-offer (if applicable)/Request for information
Acceptance
Revocation (if applicable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Unilateral contract

A

Where one party makes a promise in exchange for an act by another party. In this arrangement, only one party is obligated to perform, while the other party is not required to do anything until they choose to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Unilateral contract - offer

A

The offeror intends to be bound upon performance of a requested act or condition
Intention?
Certainty?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Unilateral contract - agreement

A

An acceptance of a unilateral offer is traditionally held to be on completion of the act requested
- Can be revoked any time before acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Unilateral contract - revocation

A

The revocation of a unilateral offer will be effective if the offeror takes reasonable steps to bring the revocation to the attention of all those who may have read the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

General rule of auctions

A

Auctioneer’s request for bids constitutes an invitation to treat
But auctioneer is free to accept or reject a bidder’s offer
However, where the auctions are ‘without reserve’, the auctioneer may be in breach of contract if he refuses to sell to the highest bidder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Without reserve meaning auctions

A

Promise to sell to the highest bidder
Known as an absolute auction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Auctions without reserve have 2 contract options

A

Bilateral
- For the goods

Unilateral
- Based on the promise to sell without the reserve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What contract is the auctioneer in breach of if he refuses to sell the goods

A

Unilateral
- Bilateral contract has not been made
- Therefore bidder is not entitled to the goods in question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Tenders

A

A formal proposal or offer to provide goods, services, or works at a specific price
- Also known as an invitation to tender, a request for tender, or a bid

Two contract’ (or collateral contract) analysis also applies to the tenders
- Request for tenders normally invitation to treat
* But an express contractual promise to accept most competitive bid or to confirm certain bid conditions may constitute a unilateral offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Invitation to treat
ITT

A

A willingness to enter into negotiations
Lacks an intention to be bound and sufficient certainty required for an offer
- This is judged objectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

ITT examples

A
  • Advertisements
  • Display of goods in a shop
  • Price lists
  • Websites
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Reasons for treating specific exchange or communication as an ITT and not offer

A

Lacks intention to be bound
Lacks sufficient certainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Offer

A

An expression of willingness, by words or conduct, of an intention to be bound on certain terms
Objective
Must be capable of being accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Counter-Offers
Request for information

A

Rejection of the terms of an offer
Extinguishes the original offer so the person making the counter-offer may not go back and accept it
The ‘battle of the forms’
‘Last shot’ rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

The ‘last shot’ rule

A

The terms presented last before a contract is formed are the ones that apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Acceptance

A

The ‘final and unqualified assent to the terms
Needed in order for there to be an agreement between the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

General rules what constitute a valid agreement

A
  • Must be unequivocal
  • Must be made in response to an offer
  • Must match the offer
  • Must be communicated to the offeror
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Factors to consider on communicating and receiving acceptance

A
  • A prescribed mode of acceptance must be followed
  • Silence cannot amount to a valid acceptance
  • Acceptance may be communicated by an authorised third party
  • Instantaneous communication
  • The postal rule
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

The postal rule

A

 A contract is formed when an offer is accepted by post, regardless of when the offeror receives the acceptance
 Applies when using the post is within the reasonable contemplation of the parties
 The rule applies to mail, postcards, and telegrams, but not to instantaneous communication like email, fax, or electronic transactions
 The rule may be ousted by evidence the parties wanted to receive acceptance
 If the acceptance does not arrive then it is still effective
 But if incorrectly addressed the rule is displaced and acceptances takes effect when receive
 Generally cannot be revoked by a more expeditious method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

The receipt rule

A

An offer is only accepted when the offeror receives the acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Prescribed mode of acceptance

A
  • If the offeror stipulates a prescribed method of acceptance (e.g. “you must reply by email”) then an acceptance by a non-prescribed mode will only be valid if it’s no less advantageous to the offeror
  • Acceptance may be communicated by a reliable and authorised third party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Silence

A

Cannot amount to valid acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Revocation

A

Anytime before acceptance – unless the offer is supported by consideration to keep open
Takes effect upon receipt
- No postal rule
May be revoked by reliable third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

How is an invitation to treat distinguished from an offer?

A

Invitation to Treat: An invitation to negotiate or make an offer (e.g., advertisements, displays of goods)

Offer: A clear proposal made by one party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What constitutes a valid offer?

A

Invitation to Treat
Offer
Clear and Definite Terms
Intention to Create Legal Relations
Communication
Capacity
Legality
Possibility of Performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What is a consideration

A

Something of value that is exchanged between parties when forming a contract
A crucial element for a contract to be legally enforceable
Law is not concerned with gratuitous promises
Represents the ‘bargain’/exchange in contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Basic structure to addressing consideration

A

Agreement between the parties
But one of the parties does not keep or wants to go back on their promise
Alternatively, may be an existing agreement but something new has been agreed on
Alteration/Modification
Issue here is whether the promise is enforceable
Is consideration valid?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

4 main rules of consideration

A
  • Consideration must be sufficient, but need not be adequate
  • Consideration must not be in the past
  • Consideration must move from the promise
  • Performance of a pre-existing duty is not good (valid) consideration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Consideration must be sufficient, but need not be adequate rule of consideration

A

To be enforceable, the consideration given in exchange for a promise must be ‘sufficient’ – recognised as being of value in the eyes of the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Consideration must be sufficient, but need not be adequate rule of consideration examples

A

Chappell V Nestlé [1960] AC 87
 Consideration in the form of chocolate bar wrappers was held to be ‘sufficient’ consideration despite the fact that they were of virtually no economic value and were simply discarded

Hamer v Sidway 124 N.Y. 538, 27 N.E. 256 (1891) – USA
 The decision by a nephew to give up drinking, smoking and gambling in return for a promise of a certain sum of money from their uncle was held to be sufficient consideration
 The nephew had given up their lawful freedom, their right, to engage in such activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Consideration must not be in the past rule of consideration

A

If the consideration is given before the promise is made then it cannot be said to have been given in support of the promise
Promise is not enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Consideration must not be in the past rule of consideration examples

A

Re McArdle [1951] Ch 699
 A promise to reimburse a relative for work already done to a house was unenforceable

Roscorla V Thomas (1842) 3 QB 234
 An oral warranty as to soundness of a horse, given after sale of the horse was held to be unenforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Consideration must move from the promise rule of consideration

A

Consideration must be provided by the promise and not a third party (but does not have to move to the promisor)
Must also be a link between the consideration and the promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Consideration must move from the promise rule of consideration example

A

Combe V Combe [1951] 2 KB 215
 A promise by a husband to pay his wife maintenance was not supported by consideration in the form of the wife refraining from going to court because the husband had not (on the facts) requested her not to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Performance of a pre-existing duty is not good (valid) consideration rule of consideration

A

Performance of something that is already required or promised is generally held not to be valid consideration
Legal or moral duties
Contractual duties
Duties owed to a third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Performance of a pre-existing duty is not good (valid) consideration rule of consideration example
Legal

A

Collins v Godefroy (1831) 1 B & Ad 950
 A promise was made to pay to Collins a guinea a day for attending a trial as a witness but because he was already subpoenaed to give evidence, he was obliged by law to do so and was not doing anything more than he was already obligated to do = no consideration, not enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Performance of a pre-existing duty is not good (valid) consideration rule of consideration example
Contractual

A

Stilk V Myrick [1809] EWHC KB J58
 Voyage from London to Baltic and back
 2 out of 11 men deserted
 Captain promised to divide the two men’s wages amongst the rest of the crew if he could not replace the two deserters
 No replacements available, so the existing crew sailed the ship back to London

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Structure of modifying promises

A

Original Agreement
-Promise to pay more
OR
-Promise to accept less
Consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Promise to pay more

A

Performance of a pre-existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
-Ensure both parties are giving something of value in new deal

Avoid PPECD rule
-Find fresh/additional consideration
-Can go beyond contractual duty

A practical benefit to promisor may support finding of consideration
-Then promise to pay more may be supported by consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Promise to accept less

A

Part-payment of debt is not sufficient consideration to support promise to discharge entire debt

Promise to discharge debt may be supported by consideration if something different or new element is given in exchange

Can presence of practical benefit from part-payment support finding of consideration to enforce the dishcharge of debt?

60
Q

PPECD rule

A

Proposal
Person
Exchange
Capacity
Deliberation

61
Q

Promissory estoppel

A

Prevents a party from withdrawing a promise when the other party has reasonably relied on that promise to their detriment, even in the absence of a formal contract
Serves to enforce fairness and justice in situations where a promise was made and reliance was placed on that promise

62
Q

Ingredients of a promissory estoppel

A
  • There must be a clear and unequivocal promise
  • The promisee has altered their position
  • It must be inequitable (unfair) to go back on the promise
  • Promissory estoppel cannot be used as a ‘sword’
  • Promissory estoppel suspends, does not extinguish, legal rights
63
Q

Altered position/reliance
Promissory estoppel

A
  • Some change in position
  • Part payment?
  • Detrimental reliance
64
Q

Inequitable to go back on the promise
Promissory estoppel

A
  • Absence of detrimental reliance = could make it fair to go back on the promise
  • Time lag
  • Prejudice to promise
  • Bad faith
65
Q

Cannot be used as a ‘sword’
Promissory estoppel

A

-Promissory estoppel cannot be used to found a cause of action

66
Q

Suspends, does not extinguish, legal rights
Promissory estoppel

A

Means it might be possible in the future to go back on promises by giving reasonable notice

67
Q

Glidewell LJ’s criteria required to find consideration

A
  • There must be a contract for goods and services
  • Doubt that the promisee will complete on time
  • Promise to pay more
  • Promisor obtains a practical benefit
  • No duress (usually economic
  • Consideration must otherwise be valid
68
Q

What are terms

A

Define the rights and liabilities under a contract

69
Q

Factors to determining if statement constitutes a term rather a representation

A
  • Importance of the statement
  • Special knowledge of the subject-matter
  • Time between statement and formation of contract
  • If the contract has been made in writing
  • Statement maker in a better position to ascertain in the accuracy of statement
  • Request to verify the truth of the statement/Assurance – no need to verify truth
70
Q

How to identify a term

A

Statement -> Representations -> Terms

71
Q

How can you express terms

A

Orally or in writing

72
Q

Parol evidence rule

A

Where a contract has been reduced to writing then the general rule is that oral statements cannot be used as evidence to vary the terms of a written contract (contractual certainty)

73
Q

Getting around parol evidence rule

A

 Does not apply to part oral partly written contracts
 Collateral contracts
 But note use of entire agreement clauses and no oral modification clauses

74
Q

Sources of implied terms

A

Courts
Statutes
Custom

75
Q

Courts as source of implied terms

A

Terms implied in fact
Terms implied in law

76
Q

Terms implied in fact

A

 To give effect to the presumed intentions of the parties
Can use officious bystander of business efficacy test

77
Q

Officious bystander test

A

 The test asks if the term is so obvious that if an officious bystander suggested it to the parties, they would respond with “oh of course”
 The test is used to determine if the parties intended to include the term, but didn’t feel the need to make it explicit

78
Q

Business efficacy test

A

 Is the term necessary for the contract to work in a practical sense? = intention of both the parties
 The term must be necessary to give the contract commercial or practical coherence. This is a value judgment, and the term is not considered “absolutely necessary”

79
Q

Terms implied in law

A

 The implication of terms as a matter of policy into all contracts of a particular type

80
Q

Statute as course of implied terms

A

Sales of Goods Act 1979
-Business to business

Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982
-Business to business

Consumer Rights Act 2015
-Consumer to business

81
Q

Trade or custom as source of implied terms

A

 Sometimes a term can be implied where there are previous dealings between the parties and such terms are usual in the parties’ particular trade of custom

82
Q

What is contractual interpretation

A

The courts must give effect to the intention of the parties as objectively determine

83
Q

Approaches to contractual interpretation

A

Old - literalist/textualism
Modern approach - contextual or purposive
Lord Hoffman’s 5 principles of interpretation

84
Q

Modern approach to contractual interpretation

A

Interpretation reflects commercial common sense

85
Q

Old approach to contractual interpretation

A

Stay within the ‘four corners’ of the contract

86
Q

Lord Hoffmann’s 5 principles of interpretation – a broader approach

A
  1. Interpretation is about figuring out what a document means to a reasonable person, based on the background knowledge both parties had at the time they made the contract.
  2. The background, often called the “matrix of fact” by Lord Wilberforce, includes everything that could have influenced how a reasonable person would understand the document’s language.

3, The law does not allow the parties’ past discussions or their personal intentions to be used as background in interpreting the document.

  1. The meaning of a document for a reasonable person isn’t always the same as the literal meaning of the words used.
  2. The “rule” that words should be understood in their “natural and ordinary meaning” simply reflects the idea that people usually don’t make obvious mistakes in formal documents.
87
Q

Executory consideration

A

A promise to do something in exchange for a similar promise
E.g. you might promise to pay someone for a service in exchange for their promise to perform the service

88
Q

Executed consideration

A

When one party has fulfilled their side of the contract, and the other party is now responsible for their obligations
E.g. if you pay someone to house-sit for a week, and they complete the task, the consideration is executed

89
Q

Past consideration

A

When a promise is made after an action has already been performed
Past consideration is generally not valid
E.g. if you promise to pay someone for a service they already completed, the consideration is past and not binding

90
Q

3 main types of consideration

A

Executory
Executed
Past

91
Q

Pinnel’s case 1602 consideration exceptions

A

Payment at a different place
Payment at a different location
Payment in a different form
Payment early

92
Q

What terms are examined closely

A

Exemption clauses
Certain consumer contract clauses
Termination clauses
Penalty clauses

93
Q

Exemption clauses

A

A party wishing to rely on an exclusion clause must prove that:
o It has been validly incorporated into the contract
o The clause is effective to exclude liability for the loss suffered
o The clause valid under UCTA 1977 or the CRA 201

94
Q

Certain consumer contract clauses

A

Consumer Rights Act 2015
 Consumer protection
 Imposes restrictions on use of exclusion and limitation clauses
 Regulates other unfair terms

95
Q

Possible liabilities of party seeking to rely on exemption clause

A
  • Breach of Contract?
  • Term(s) that has been breached?
  • Express or Implied?
  • Negligence?
  • Misrepresentation?
96
Q

3 main ways of incorporating a term into a contract

A

By signation
By notice By previous dealings or custom

97
Q

By signation
Incorporation of terms

A

 A party is in general bound by his signature – whether they have read the terms or not (the ‘signature rule’)
 The exceptions to the ‘signature rule’ are limited

98
Q

How can a person signing a contract get out of their signature

A

Defence of non est factum applies
Misrepresentation is established

99
Q

Non est factum

A

Person must be somebody who relies on others for advice as to what they are signing e.g. blindness or illiteracy
The document signed must be radically different in character or effect from what the person thought they were signing

100
Q

By notice
Incorporation of terms

A

 Before or at the time of contracting
 The terms must be contained or referred to in a document intended to have contractual effect or to contain contractual terms
 Reasonable notice must be given of the terms

101
Q

What constitutes reasonable notice?

A

 Constructive notice, not actual notice
 Red hand rule

102
Q

Red hand rule

A

o If a contract includes unusually harsh or surprising terms, these must be brought to the attention of the other party in a clear and conspicuous way
o It’s like saying “these terms are especially important, so pay close attention!”

103
Q

By previous dealings or custom

A

 Sufficiently regular and consistent
 Consistent use of terms
 Regular course of dealings over a sufficient period of time
 Custom
 Burden of proof lies on person seeking to enforce the clause

104
Q

What is necessary to ask in cases of exemption clauses

A

Whether clause covers type of liability and loss in question
Question of contractual interpretation and construction

105
Q

What restrictive approach do the courts take towards exemption clauses (especially exclusion clauses)

A

The contra proferentem rule

106
Q

Contra proferentem rule

A

In the event of ambiguity around the meaning of the clause, the ambiguity will be resolved against the party seeking to rely on the exemption clause

107
Q

How to exempt liability for negligence

A

Use clear words
If wording could be applied to either negligence/non-negligent liability and is concurrent liability in contract and tort, then clause will generally be confined to non-negligent source of liability

108
Q

Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
UCTA

A
  • Commercial contracts (B2B)
  • Certain clauses are deemed ineffective at the outset e.g. excluding liability for personal injury
  • Others are subjected to the ‘reasonableness test’
  • Are only valid if the party seeking to rely on the clause can establish that it is reasonable
109
Q

Scope of UCTA

A
  • It is for the person relying on the protections of UCTA to show that the statute applies
  • UCTA applies to ‘business liability’ – things done or to be done in the course of business and liability arising from occupying business premises (s1(3))
  • No general power to strike out any term which is unfair or unreasonable – UCTA applies to exemption clauses (excluding or limiting liability): a term that seeks to restrict any right or remedy (s13)
110
Q

Main provisions of UCTA

A
  • Liability for negligence
     Death or personal injury cannot be excluded or restricted
     Other loss and damage may be excluded or restricted only if the term satisfies the reasonableness test
  • Sale or supply of goods: defective products
     Implied terms about title (e.g. s12 SGA 1979) cannot be excluded or limited
     Implied terms about satisfactory quality, fitness for purpose or sale by description (e.g. s13, 14, 15 SGA 1979) may be excluded or restricted only if the term satisfies the reasonableness test
  • Liability for breach of strict contractual obligation (not sale and supply contracts)
111
Q

Consumer Rights Act 2015
CRA

A
  • For consumer contracts, replaces the SGA 1979, SGSA 1982, UCTA 1977 and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations (UTCCR) 1999
  • Introduced in order to simply, strengthen and update the law relating to consumer protection
  • Implied terms around product quality (s9…) and around supply of service (s49…) covered when we discussed Terms
112
Q

Scope of CRA

A
  • Applies to contracts between a ‘trader’ (defined in s2(2) CRA 2015) and a ‘consumer’ (defined in s2(3) CRA 2015)
  • S2(2): “Trader” means a person acting for purposes relating to that person’s trade, business, craft or profession, whether acting personally or through another person acting in the trader’s name or on the trader’s behalf
  • S2(3): “Consumer” means an individual acting for purposes that are wholly or mainly outside that individual’s trade, business, craft or profession
  • Applies to unfair terms (and not just exemption clauses)
113
Q

Regulation of exemption clauses of CRA

A
  • Regulation of exemption clauses
  • Section 31
     Attempts to ‘exclude or restrict’ liability in goods contracts (e.g. satisfactory quality) are ‘not binding’ (replacing s6 /s7 UCTA)
  • Section 57
     Attempts to ‘exclude’ liability arising in services contracts (e.g. failing to take reasonable care and skill) are ‘not binding’ (see s47 on digital content)
     Possible to limit liability but cannot be less than the contract price and is subject to the fairness test
114
Q

Regulation of unfair terms of CRA

A
  • Part 2 previously found in the UTCCR 1999
     UTCCR implemented the Unfair Consumer Contract Terms Directive 93/13/EEC into domestic law
     Overlapped with UCTA
  • Cannot exempt liability for death of personal injury
     “A trader cannot by a term of a consumer contract or by a consumer notice exclude or restrict liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.” (s65(1))
115
Q

S62 test of (un)fairness

A
  • A term is unfair where “contrary to the requirement of good faith” it “causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract to the detriment of the consumer”
  • Case law under the UTCCR 1999 relevant
  • Applies to all unfair terms
116
Q

2 elements of S62 test of (un)fairness

A
  • Contrary to the requirement of good faith – fair and open dealing: the clause must be expressed fully and clearly
  • Causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations: the clause must not tilt the parties’ rights and obligations significantly in the proferens’ favour, to the disadvantage of the consumer
117
Q

What is a claimant entitled to following a breach of contract

A

Various remedies

118
Q

Remedies examples

A
  • Damages Court assessed (unliquidated damages)
     Agreed damages clause (liquidated)
  • Other remedies
     Restitution (limited)
     Specific Performance (limited)
     Termination or affirmation (limited)
119
Q

Court assessed damages

A

General right to damages following any breach
* Damages are primarily awarded in compensation for loss
* Compensation for expectation loss (loss of the benefit of the promised performance – the expected gain under the contract)
* The amount paid to the claimant in damages depends on their loss, the ability of the courts to measure the loss and various restrictions and limiting factors

120
Q

Stages that need addressing in a claim for damages

A
  1. Identify breach, losses and remedies available
  2. Measure: what is measure of loss?
  3. Non-pecuniary loss
  4. Causation: did the breach cause the loss(es)?
  5. Remoteness: is each loos too remote?
  6. Reduction: mitigation/contributory negligence
121
Q

Remedies

A
  • Following a Breach of Contract, the claimant is entitled to various remedies
122
Q

What remedies is C entitled to

A

Damages court assessed (unliquidated damages)
Other remedies
 Restitution (limited)
 Specific Performance (limited)
 Termination or affirmation (limited)

123
Q

Court assessed/umliquidated damages

A
  • Generally there is a right to damages following any breach
  • Damages are primarily awarded in compensation for loss
  • Compensation for expectation loss (loss of the benefit of the promised performance – the expected gain under the contract)
  • The amount paid to the claimant in damages depends on their loss, the ability of the courts to measure the loss and various restrictions and limiting factors
124
Q

Stages that need addressing in claim for damages

A
  1. Identify the breach, losses and the remedies available
  2. Measure: What is the measure of loss? Non-pecuniary loss: Is there any non-pecuniary loss (if relevant)?
  3. Non-pecuniary loss: Is there any non-pecuniary loss (if relevant)?
  4. Causation: Did the breach cause the loss(es)?
  5. Remoteness: Is each loss not too remote?
  6. Reduction: Mitigation/Contributory negligence
125
Q
  1. Identify the breach, losses and the remedies available
A

Breach
Loss(es)
Remedies

126
Q
  1. Measure: What is the measure of loss? Non-pecuniary loss: Is there any non-pecuniary loss (if relevant)?
A

Expectation (or performance) interest
 Covers both the benefits expected (e.g. loss of profit) and also the cost of the performance itself (e.g. cost of cure)
 Is primary measure of damages in contract law
 Cost of cure damages will be awarded
Reliance interest
Consequential loss

127
Q

When will cost of cure damages be awarded

A

 Reasonable to award damages = cost of cure not out of proportion to benefit obtained
 There is an intention to remedy the defect (note – relevant to determining the actual loss)

128
Q

Ways of calculating expectation interest

A

 Difference in value
 Cost of cure
 Loss of amenity

129
Q

What is reliance interest

A

Wasted expenditure
 Pre-contractual (if within the reasonable contemplation of the parties) / Post-contractual but must be prior to the breach
 Claimant has an unfettered choice
 The courts will not award expectation damages if they are highly speculative

130
Q
  1. Non-pecuniary loss: Is there any non-pecuniary loss (if relevant)?
A

Mental distress = is there any non-pecuniary loss? Is it recoverable?

131
Q

Exceptions to non-pecuniary loss

A

 Where the very object of a contract is to provide pleasure, relaxation, peace of mind or freedom from molestation, damages will be awarded if the fruit of the contract is not provided…
 In cases not falling within this exceptional category, damages are in my view recoverable for physical inconvenience and discomfort caused by the breach and mental suffering directly related to that inconvenience and discomfort

132
Q
  1. Causation: Did the breach cause the loss(es)?
A
  • The breach must be a dominant or effective cause of the loss
  • Intervening acts
133
Q
  1. Remoteness: Is each loss not too remote?
A
  • Not all losses flowing from a breach of contract are recoverable => traditionally – test of reasonable contemplation
  • Narrower test of remoteness than in tort (reasonable foreseeability) – greater degree of probability required in contract – ‘not unlikely’, ‘serious possibility’, ‘real danger’
  • Type of loss (not the extent) needs to be foreseeable
134
Q
  1. Reduction: Mitigation/Contributory negligence
A
  • Injured party should take ‘all reasonable steps’ to mitigate (reduce) their loss
  • Reasonable expenditure can be recovered
  • Does not prevent a party affirming a contract from going to the expense of performing their side of the bargain
135
Q

What about contributory negligence in reduction

A

 Only applies where D’s liability in contract is the same as his liability in negligence (negligent breach) which arises independently of the contract

136
Q

What are agreed damages clauses

A
  • (or liquidated damages (LD) clause) stipulates a sum payable upon breach, e.g. pay £5 upon every breach
  • But penalty clauses are unenforceable and the injured party may bring an action for unliquidated damages
137
Q

Justifications for allowing agreed damages clauses

A
  • Incentive to carry out the work on time
  • Right to claim an agreed rate of compensation
  • BUT
  • Not allowed to punish the D
  • The courts have retained a jurisdiction to control the content of such clauses
138
Q

Old approach for agreed damages clauses justifications

A

Genuine pre-estimation of loss = agreed damages clauses

139
Q

New test for agreed damages clauses justifications

A
  • The true test is whether the impugned provision is a secondary obligation which imposes a detriment on the contract-breaker out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of the primary obligation
140
Q

Is agreed damages clause a primary or secondary obligation

A

If primary, it will not engage the penalty rule
 If secondary, the clause will not be a penalty if it:
 Protects a legitimate interest (the commercial context is relevant and if contract is negotiated); and
 Imposes a detriment proportionate to the legitimate interest (it is not ‘extravagant’, ‘exorbitant’ or ‘unconscionable

141
Q

Penalty rule

A

States that a clause in a contract that is intended to punish a breaching party is unenforceable if it goes beyond the actual loss incurred
This is because the amount specified in a penalty clause is not related to the actual loss

142
Q

Restitution

A

Unjust enrichment
 Contract terminated
 Must be a total failure of consideration
 Non-monetary benefits conferred

143
Q

Restitution for wrongs

A
  • Enrichment by wrongdoing (account of profits)
     Account of profits
     General position: Damages for breach of contract cannot be measured by D’s gains or savings
144
Q

Exceptions for restitution for wrongs

A

Fiduciary duty
Infringement of property rights

145
Q

Specific performance in clauses

A

An order from the court to which requires the breaching party to perform their primary obligations

146
Q

Restrictions to specific performance

A
  • Causes severe hardship to D
  • Contract is unfair to D
  • C does not deserve the remedy
  • C taking advantage of a mistake by D
  • Performance is impossible
  • Contract is too vague
  • Contract is one for personal service
  • Need for supervision
147
Q
A

Law Sem 1, Yr1 (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions