Contract Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Bradley v Morgan

A

Death may end offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Collateral contracts allow third party to enforce promises - privity of contract

A

Shanklin pier v detel products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Recision - remedies

A

Leaf v international galleries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Party’s are prevented from performing obligations

A

Condor v baton knights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Each separate obligation can be singular enforceable

A

Taylor v Webb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Attempts to avoid privity

A

Port line v Ben line streamers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Liquidated damages - remedies

A

Dunlop pneumatic tyre v motor co

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Must be brought to attention of offerors

A

Entores v miles far east

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Commercial agreements - intention to create legal relations

A

Edwards v skyways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Illegitimate pressure - economic duress

A

Atlas express v kafco

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Inonimate term Decided by courts

A

Grand china logistics v spar shipping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Grand china logistics v spar shipping

A

Brogden v metropolitan railway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Negligent misrep

A

Howard marine v Ogden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Anticipatory breach

A

HocHester v de la tour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If performance is illegal contract becomes frustrated

A

Metropolitan water board v dick Kerr

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Damages available based on what would have been foreseen by reasonable party - rules and theory

A

Wellesly partners v withers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Breach is sufficient to allow repudiation of contract

A

Hong Kong fir case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Must be identifiablepromise or commitment made - intention to create legal relations

A

Kleinwort benson v Malaysian mining

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Freedom of contract - rules and theory

A

Prime sight v laverello

20
Q

Acceptance of part performance, payment can be enforceable

A

Sumpter v hedges

21
Q

Specific performance - remedies

A

Dyster v Randall and sons

22
Q

contract is not discharged until all obligations are performed

A

Cutter v Powell

23
Q

Subject matter is unavailable

A

Morgan v manser

24
Q

Breach of condition gives injured party right to reject

A

Poussard v spiers and pond

25
Q

Central purpose of contract destroyed by event

A

Krell v Henry

26
Q

Contract ends if subject matter is destroyed

A

Taylor v Caldwell

27
Q

Coercion of will - economic duress

A

Pao on v lau yin Lang

28
Q

Duration of offer ends if offer is revoked before acceptance

A

Dickson v Dodds

29
Q

Party goes beyond existing duty - consideration

A

Williams v roffey

30
Q

Both parties must be certain on what their agreeing - rules and theory

A

Guthing v Lyon

31
Q

Lapse of time may result in end of offer

A

Ramsgate hotel v montefire

32
Q

Unaware they have done conduct to accept

A

Gibbons v proctor

33
Q

Not party to contract - privity of contract

A

Beswick v beswick

34
Q

Past consideration is not consideration

A

Roscorla v Thomas

35
Q

Counter offer is deemed end of contract

A

Hyde v wrench

36
Q

Offer made through advertisement

A

Car hill v carbolic smokeball co

37
Q

Fraudulent misrep

A

Derry v peek

38
Q

Postal rule applies on date when posted

A

Adams v lindsell

39
Q

Silence is not acceptance

A

Felthouse v bindley

40
Q

Third party cannot be imposed unless given consent - privity of contact

A

Tweddle v Atkinson

41
Q

Consideration must be sufficient something of value in return

A

Thomas v Thomas

42
Q

Offer is at end if it’s rejected

A

Hyde v wrench

43
Q

Invitation to treat is not an offer

A

Fisher v bell

44
Q

Relation in place of couple split up - intention to create legal relations

A

Merit v Merritt

45
Q

Social and domestic situations not deemed as legal relations - intention to create legal relations

A

Balfour v Balfour

46
Q

Person is bound whatever true intention may be - rules and theory

A

Smith v hughes