Contract Defenses Flashcards

1
Q

Voidable Contract

A

These contracts may be affirmed or rejected at the discretion of one of the parties. This discretion is given to parties deemed vulnerable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Void Contracts

A

Not legally enforceable from inception. If a contract is void, neither party can enforce it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Minor Incapacity

A

Can generally enter into contracts, but they retain the right to disaffirm or cancel these agreements, even if the contract has already been partially or fully executed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Minor Incapacity Exceptions

A

(1) Necessities of Life: Contracts for essentials like food, clothing, shelter, and medical services are enforceable even against minors, as these items are critical to their well-being.
(2) Misrepresentation of Age: Some jurisdictions prevent minors from disaffirming a contract if they lied about their age, especially if the other party acted in good faith.
(3) Intentional Tortious Conduct: If a minor willfully damages property or commits fraud, they may be liable for restitution.
(4) Statutory Exceptions: Student loans, insurance, and certain employment contracts
(5) Emancipation: Frees a minor from the control of their parents or guardians before they reach the age of majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mental Incapacity

A

A person incurs only voidable contractual duties by entering into a transaction when they are unable to understand consequences of the transaction, or is unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction and the other party has reason to know of his condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cognitive Test

A

Examines if the party could in a reasonable manner understand the “nature and consequences” of the transaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mental Incapacity Exceptions

A
  1. Necessities
  2. Fair Terms without Knowledge
    a. The agreement has been performed (in whole or in part)
    b. The other party had no knowledge of the incompetency,
    c. The terms are fair.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Intoxication

A

A contract is only voidable if the party seeking rescission was so impaired that they could not understand the “nature and consequences” of the transaction or act reasonably. Very seldom successful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Intoxication Defense

A

Necessities of Life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duress

A

If a party’s manifestation of assent is induced by an improper threat by the other party that leaves the victim no reasonable alternative, the contract is voidable by the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Improper Threat

A

(1) Crime or Tort: Threatening a criminal act, physical violence, or harm to property qualifies as improper.
(2) Criminal Prosecution: A threat of prosecution intended solely to coerce contract formation is improper, regardless of the threat’s legitimacy.
(3) Bad Faith Use of Civil Process: A threat to sue in civil court with no actual legal basis is improper.
(4) Violation of Good Faith and Fair Dealing: Any threat that breaches the duty of good faith in a way that denies the other party’s contractual benefits is considered improper.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Physical Duress

A

A contract signed under physical compulsion is automatically void since no true agreement is made. Courts void such agreements based on public policy and mutual assent principles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Economic Duress

A

Arises in situations like contract modifications, settlements, or urgent financial need where one party exploits the other’s financial vulnerability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Undue Influence

A

(1) Inducement: The undue influence must have substantially influenced the victim’s decision.
(2) Persuasion: Different from standard negotiation, unfair persuasion occurs when subtle psychological or emotional pressure is applied, often in fiduciary or trusted relationships.
(3) Undue Susceptibility: Courts assess whether the victim was susceptible due to mental, physical, or emotional weakness or due to a trusted relationship.
(4) Inequitable Result: The contract outcome must be unfair or unusually disadvantageous to the susceptible party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Misrepresentation

A

(1) False Statement of Fact: A statement that objectively conveys incorrect information (can be non-verbal) about a fact existing at the time of the contract.
(2) Inducement: The false statement must substantially contribute to the recipient’s decision to enter the contract
(3) Justifiable Reliance: The reliance on the false statement must be reasonable given the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Materiality

A
  • A reasonable person would find the fact important enough to influence their decision and the maker knew the recipient’s specific circumstances that made the fact significant
16
Q

Fraudulent Misrepresentation

A

(1) The maker knows or believes the statement is false.
(2) The maker intends the recipient to rely on the false statement.
(3) Materiality is NOT required

17
Q

Material Misrepresentation

A

A statement that is false but made without intent to deceive, and it significantly influences the recipient’s decision

18
Q

Nondisclosure

A

(1) materially effected the transaction
(2) involves facts not readily observable or known to the uniformed party
(3) falls under one of the exceptions

19
Q

Nondisclosure Exceptions

A

(1) Statutory Requirements
(2) Intentional Concealment
(3) Relationships of Trust: Fiduciaries and parties with special relationships must disclose material facts
(4) Correcting Mistakes: If one party realizes the other is mistaken about a material fact, they must correct it to avoid breaching the duty of good faith

20
Q

Procedural Unconscionability

A

(1) Gross Inequality in Bargaining Power
(2) Unfair Surprise

21
Q

Unfair Surprise

A

(1) Lack of Knowledge: When one party cannot understand the contract due to educational or cognitive limitations.
(2) Sharp Bargaining Practices: Marketing techniques that border on being dishonest and misleading
(3) Hidden and Complex Terms: When a party purposefully makes a documents more difficult to understand then necessary

22
Q

Sliding Scale of Unconscionability

A

In applying the elements, a sliding scale allows for a greater degree of one element and a lesser degree of the other to result in a finding of unconscionability