Contract Damages Flashcards
Legal Damages
are applicable where the parties have a contract, the defendant is in breach, and the plaintiff has been injured by the breach and wants money to compensate for the loss.
Types of Contract Damages
- Expectation Damages
- Consequential Damages
- Incidental Damages
- Reliance Damages
- Liquidated Damages
- Nominal Damages
Expectation Damages (compensatory damages)
in contract compensate the plaintiff for the value the plaintiff expected to receive from the contract
Consequential damages
seek to compensate for damages that are a direct and foreseeable consequence of the contract not being performed and are found in addition to expectation damages.
Incidental Damages
include those reasonably incurred by buyer in rejecting nonconforming goods, or by a seller in reselling goods resulting from a buyer’s breach (e.g., storage, transportation costs)
Reliance Damages
seek to put the plaintiff in the same position he would have been in had the contract never been made. The measure is the cost to the plaintiff of his performance.
Damages
are stipulated to in a clause in the contract. A liquidated damages clause is proper when:
- Damages are difficult to calculate; and
- The stipulated amount in the liquidated damages clause bears a reasonable relationship to the anticipated loss.
Nominal damages
Serve as a declaration that the contract has been breached, but plaintiff has not suffered a loss.
Potential Limitations on Contract Damages
- Causation
- Foreseeability -reasonable person at the time of contract
- Certainty: not overly speculative
- Unavoidable- P has duty to mitigate
- Liquidated damages clause that is valid will control and be the only measure of damages allowed for breach of the underlying contract
Legal Restitution as Contract Remedy
is appropriate where the defendant has derived a benefit, or been unjustly enriched, and it would be unfair to allow the defendant to keep that benefit without compensating the plaintiff, or where the plaintiff wants his property back. The goal of restitution is to prevent unjust enrichment.
Quasi-Contract (money restitution)
applies where there is no legally binding contract, but the defendant has derived a benefit and fairness requires payment to plaintiff.
Ways Quasi-Contract can arise
- No attempt to contract: The plaintiff can recover the value of the benefit unjustly retained by the defendant (e.g., emergency services)
- Unenforceable contract: The plaintiff can recover the value of the benefit unjustly retained by defendant (e.g., contract illegal, SOF failure, etc.)
- Breached contract: Recovery depends on status.
- P is non-breacher: P can recover the value of the benefit conferred, or the P can get his property back.
- P is in breach: The traditional rule provides no recovery. The modern trend allows recovery.
Equitable Remedies in Contract
are only available when the remedy at law, money damages, is inadequate. The goal of equitable remedy is to prevent unjust enrichment. There are two equitable remedies in Contract:
- Rescission
- Reformation
Rescission
permits a party to undo a bargain and restores the parties to the position each would have been if the bargain had not been entered into.
a. No meeting of the minds: There must be a contract formation problem resulting from fraud, duress, mistake, or a material misrepresentation
b. Defenses of laches and unclean hands are applicable.
Reformation
rewrites the contract to reflect the parties’ true agreement where the written document does not accurately reflect the agreement. There must have been a valid contract in the first place.
a. Proper grounds for reformation include fraud, mistake, material misrepresentation (e.g., scrivener’s error)
b. Defense of laches and unclean hands are applicable.