Contract 2 - consideration Flashcards
What is consideration and its 2 types?
An exchange between the parties
- Executed: at start of contract, consideration has already been performed ๐ก๏ธ๐
- Executory: parties make promises to each other to perform something in the future ๐ก๏ธ๐ฎ
What 7 rules/principles are there on consideration?
- Must not be past ๐ฐ๏ธ
- Must move from promise ๐ค
- Must be have sufficient value ๐ท
- Need not be adequate ๐ช
โโBut bewareโโ - A pre-existing public duty ๐ฎ
- A pre-existing contractual obligation owed to promisor ๐
- A pre-existing contractual obligation owed to a 3rd party ๐ฅธ๐
What is the rule of โconsideration must not be pastโ and what is the exception?
If act was before promise, canโt be exchange for that promise
Exception: where some prior act was provided by promisee at promisorโs request & always understood theyโd be paid:
- promisor requested act ๐ฃ๏ธ๐งโ๐พ
- Parties understood there would be benefit ๐ท๐งโ๐พ
- Benefit would be legally enforceable had it been promised in advance ๐งโ๐พ๐งโโ๏ธ
What is the principle of a โpre-existing contractual obligation owed to promisorโ in relation to consideration?
General Rule: when party promises additional payment for existing contractual obligations, not good consideration
Exception: factual consideration - nothing new promised but party still getting something out of reshaped deal
What are the requirements for factual consideration?
- Entered into contract ๐
- B doubts that A will complete obligations. ๐ฌ
- B promises A extra payment so A performs on time. ๐ทโฑ๏ธ
- B obtains in practice a benefit, or obviates a disbenefit. ๐
- No economic duress or fraud. ๐คจ
What is a โpre-existing contractual obligation to a third partyโ?
Performance will be sufficient consideration but party offering to do this is risking double liability
Is a debtor promising to pay part of a debt in return for release of remainder of liability good consideration?
No
Exceptions:
- introducing new element into payment;
- payment of a lesser sum by a 3rd party;
- practical benefit argument
What is promissory estoppel?
Protecting a partyโs reliance on a non-bargain promise, commonly used for debts
- shield, not a sword ๐ก๏ธ
- Clear, unequivocal promise that strict legal rights wonโt be fully enforceable ๐๐คโ๏ธ
- Change of position in reliance on the promise (need not show detriment) ๐ฅณ
- Inequitable to allow promisor to go back on the promise โ๏ธ