Contract Flashcards

1
Q

Four requirements for a contract.

A
  • Offer and acceptance
  • Consideration
  • intention to create legal relations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Offer and acceptance

A

Offeror - person making the offer
Offeree - person whom the offer is made
Objective test - determine whether an agreement has been formed
subjective test - existence of an agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Where the offeree knew or ought to have known that the offeror has made a mistake

A

OFFER - agrees to be legally bound with another party
ITT - negotiate/discuss terms, which goods sold - lead to a contract at a later date.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Offer

A

Bilateral offer - offer or promise in exchange for an offer or promise

Unilateral offer - offer in exchange for a specified act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Acceptance

A

Complete agreement to the terms of the offer

acceptance of a bilateral offer -
1. must be communicated
2. postal acceptance - as soon as posted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Acceptance of unilateral offers

A

Accepts by conduct - doesn’t need to be communicated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Termination

A

Once offer is terminated, it cannot be accepted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Revoke offer

A

Must be communicated - postal does not apply.
Cannot revoke unilateral offers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Counter offers

A

Terminate any offers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Consideration

A

an act or promise of value, in exchange for an act, promise or value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consideration

A

Rule is that consideration must be sufficient but doesn’t need to be adequate. Consideration must not be past.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Adequate

A

no requirement for consideration to reflect the economic or monetary value of what is provided in exchange.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sufficient

A

Provided it was what the promisor requested in exchange for this promise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Consideration - existing duties

A

Starting point for agreement amendments to pay more than was initially agreed is that they are not enforceable unless
- doing more than originally agreed
- promisor obtains a practical benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To note

A

Paying less is not consideration
Pay more - not consideration unless they benefit
Must not be passed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Promissory estoppel

A

doctrine that provides a defence to a debtor to stop a creditor going back on his promise to accept a smaller amount than is owed under the original agreement.

17
Q

Criteria for promissory estoppel

A

Shield and not a sword.
must be clear and unambiguous that they will not enforce their rights under the contract.
- applies to amendments of contracts not formation of contracts.
- promisee must have relied on the promise.
- must be inequitable (unfair) for the promisor to go back on promise.

18
Q

CONTRACT

A

Intention to create legal relations - intent to be legally bound.

19
Q

Rebuttable Presumption

A

Whether the parties had the intention to create legal relations.

20
Q

Two types of rebuttable presumption

A
  1. In the social and domestic context. RP that parties did not have intent.
  2. Commercial content. RP that parties to an agreement have the intention.
21
Q

RP in the social and domestic context.

A

Presumption can be rebutted if:
- the terms of the agreement are certain
- the parties are not on friendly terms when the agreement was made.
- the agreement is serious’
- one party has relied on the agreement to their detriment.

22
Q

RP in the commercial context.

A

Presumption can be rebutted if:
- clear words that the agreement should not have legal effect
- uncertainty in the agreement terms

23
Q

INTENT

A

Certainty
- too vague
- is not complete
- one/both parties are mistaken

24
Q

VOID

A

Has no legal effect

25
Q

VOIDABLE

A

Valid and binding but can be set aside by party that has a remedy.

26
Q

CAPACITY

A
  • mental capacity
  • intoxication
  • minors
  • companies
27
Q

PRIVITY OF CONTRACT

A

3rd party cannot acquire rights or be subject to its burdens.

28
Q

EXCEPTIONS

A

The Contract (rights of third parties) Act 1999
- enforce remedies for breach of C
- rely on a clause that limits or excludes his liability

29
Q

Assignment

A

a person who has rights can assign them to 3rd party.
- permitted under the terms of the relevant agreement
- absolute
- in writing

30
Q

PRIVITY

A

Agency - must be clear in the main agreement that 3rd party protected.
- clear acting as agent
- must have authority from 3rd party to act as agent
- 3rd party must provide consideration to the party to the main contract

31
Q

COLLATERAL CONTRACT

A

A tells B to buy paint from C, Paint is useless. A has a claim against C although B made the purchase.

32
Q

REMEDIES - 3RD PARTY

A
  • damages
  • specific performance
  • injunctions