Continental Drift (3.1) Flashcards

1
Q

What are some historical concepts?

A
  • Suggestions that coastlines once fit together made in 1596 as map-making improved.
  • C19th view of mountains as wrinkles on surface of cooling, contracting Earth. Continuous crust (Gondwanaland) broke apart as planet shrunk.
  • Contracting Earth models discredited C20th, no agreed replacement model.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the origin of continental drift?

A
  • German meteorologist Alfred Wegener first proposed land masses change position with time.
  • Proposed existence of supercontinent Pangaea.
  • Suggestion by F.B. Taylor (1910) that lateral motions caused mountain belts at edges of drifting continents.
  • Both uniformitarian concepts; drift is still happening.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was Wegener’s evidence?

A
  • Fit of continents: fit not coincidental, shorelines make rough fit, continental shelf edges make even better fit (Bullard, 1965)
  • Past glaciations: glacial evidence for Permian age glaciers found on 4 continents, found in regions too warm for glaciers today.
  • Palaeoclimatic belts: tropical sediments occur in northern parts of Pangaea.
  • Fossil distribution: identical fossils found on separate landmasses, could not have crossed the ocean.
  • Matching geological units: fold belts, igneous provinces, metallogenic provinces.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the problem with Wegener’s proposed theory and evidence?

A
  • He could not explain how/why continents ploughed through ocean floor.
  • Suggested motions driven by centripetal force acting on elevated continents due to Earth’s rotation and/or tidal effects due to gravity of Sun and Moon.
  • Calculations showed forces too small.
  • Wegener’s theory was largely dismissed, he was vilified for scientific method of having hypothesis and then looking for evidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was empirical evidence for mantle flow?

A
  • Deduced from active uplift over past 10ka of deglaciated regions in Scandinavia.
  • Realised continents move through substrate which they are embedded.
  • Arthur Holmes (1928) proposed continents move laterally, driven by convection currents in mantle beneath.
  • Mantle does not need to be liquid to flow, can deform and flow as plastic solid (when hot).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the application of palaeomagnetism?

A
  • 1950s, UK geophysicists Ted Irving and Keith Runcorn realised palaeomagnetism could be used as test of Wegener’s continental drift hypothesis.
  • Measured palaeomagnetic inclinations of rocks at different ages in region they could reconstruct any change of latitude with time.
  • With any declination change, they could calculate how far away pole had been relative to continent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the apparent polar wander?

A
  • Irving and Runcorn found calculated poles for Britain and Europe had shifted systematically through geological time.
  • Two interpretations: Earth’s poles moved relative to continents, and land masses moved relative to poles.
  • By 1956, had enough evidence to show polar wander paths were consistent with continents, but distinct from continent to continent.
  • Show paths for Europe and North America moved parallel together between 500 and ~200 Myr ago.
  • Still proposed no mechanism, but this caused a revisit to Wegener’s continental drift concept.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly