Content, Meaning, and Interpretation & Performance Flashcards

1
Q

helpful to determine:

A
  • what promises were made in the K
  • a L exists
  • no defense bars enforcement
  • S/F is not applicable or is satisfied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

rules in aid of interpretation

A
  • words/conduct int. in light of all of the circumstances
  • principal purpose of parties (if ascertainable) is given great weight
  • a writing is int. as a whole & all other writings that are part of the same trx are interpreted together
  • general/technical meaning of words prevails (unless otherwise agreed by parties)
  • course of performance is given great weight
  • manifestations of intent of parties are interpreted as consistent with each other and with any relevant COP/COD, or TU
  • preference for an int. which gives the terms a reasonable and lawful meaning (rather than unreasonable/unlawful)
  • express terms > COP > COD > TU
  • separately negotiated/added terms are given greater weight than standardized terms/other terms not separately negotiated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

parol evidence rule

A

when applicable, bars . . .
(1) use of PE to alter the term that the parties considered final in the K
(2) use of PE to add a term to a contract the parties considered fully expressed in the written K

does NOT apply to determining ambiguity!

if final or complete/exclusive –> PER does not apply!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PER terminology

A

final expression –> partially/integrated

complete and exclusive statement –> completely integrated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

outside scope of PER

A
  • interpreting ambiguous term
  • showing COP, COD, TU
  • evidence from separate/collateral agrmts (completely separate, subsequent agrmt)
  • shows formation problems (ex. duress)
  • shows grounds for granting a particular remedy
  • shows modification
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

integrated agreement

A

writings constituting a final expression of one/more terms of agrmt

whether is integrated or whether complete/partial is to be determined by the court

where the parties reduce an agrmt to a writing which in view of its completeness and specificity reasonably appears to be a complete agreement (unless established by other evidence that it is not)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

completely integrated agreement

A

IA adopted by the parties as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

partially integrated agreement

A

IA that is not completely integrated

contains only SOME of agreed upon terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

duty of good faith

A

every contract contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the performance and enforcement of the K

objective standard

must take reasonable efforts
- if drafted –> parties have discretion
- if not drafted/left out –> courts will impose need BEST efforts

duty to try

duty not to interfere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

terms implied in fact

A

agreed to by parties implicitly rather than explicitly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

terms implied in law

A

selected by court to fill in gap

consistent with but not representing parties’ choice

COPCODUOT may be a source - presumed intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

gap fillers

A

courts use default provisions

only binding if parties did not agree to the contrary

public policies - UE, forfeiture, overreaching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

forfeiture

A

the loss of compensation that results when a party loses his right to the agreed exchange after he has relied substantially, as by preparation or performance, or the expectation of that exchange

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

overreaching

A

gaining an unconscionable advantage of another, especially by unfair or deceptive means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

seller output, buyer requirement

A

output –> seller drives output
requirement –> buyer drives requirements

occur in good faith

no party can demand/tender a quantity that is unreasonably disproportionate to a stated estimate (if there is one), or if not - to any normal or otherwise comparable prior output or requirement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

conditions to sale of goods

A

tender of delivery is a condition to buyer’s duty to accept goods and pay for them

tender of payment is a condition to seller’s duty to tender and complete delivery

parties can contract contrary to these conditions

non-performance of a condition is NOT breach

17
Q

express conditions

A

clear, unambiguous, agreed-upon

must be met with strict compliance

if not met, no duty for the person benefitting from the condition

18
Q

excuse from condition

A
  • party hinders/prevents fulfillment of condition
  • party waives condition
  • condition cannot be performed due to impossibility
  • fulfillment of condition would cause disproportionate forfeiture
19
Q

conditions of satisfaction

A

makes one party’s duty conditional on the other part’s satisfaction with the other party’s performance

20
Q

how to analyze conditions of satisfaction

A
  1. satisfaction clause?
  2. language of clause
    (a) clear –> take as is
    (b) unclear –> taste/personal judgment OR mechanical/commercial/utility
  3. personal taste –> subjective (good faith)
    commercial –> objective
21
Q

implied conditions

A

subject to substantial performance (not strict compliance)

three types:
- mutual/independent
- sequential dependent
- simultaneous dependent

22
Q

mutual and independent promises

A

uncommon - parties must do expressly

no conditions

each party must perform

23
Q

sequential dependent promises

A

implied order to each party’s performance

implied conditions connect

typically service contracts

24
Q

simultaneous dependent promises

A

each party’s performance is due at the same time

implied concurrent conditions

typically buy/sell contract

25
Q

order of performance

A

if performances can be rendered simultaneously –> due simultaneously

if performance of one party requires completion over a period of time –> that party’s performance is due first

these apply unless language of agreement/circumstances stimulation otherwise

26
Q

divisibility

A

if K performances can be apportioned into equal parts, K is divisible

breach of one part of the K is not a breach of the other parts

courts may not apply divisibility doctrine if loss of one piece destroys purpose of K