Contemporary Study Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the contemporary study in biological psychology

A

Brendgen (2005)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were Brendgen (2005) three aims?

A

To see if social aggression is caused by genes or the environment

To see if physical aggression has the same cause as social aggression

To see if one type of aggression leads to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why was Brendgens aim useful to consider?

A

Furthers our understanding of potential causes of aggression, which could lead to strategies to reduce aggression

Also supplying evidence for the nature / nurture debate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who were Brendgen (2005) pp?

A

332 pairs of twins were originally recruited

Only 234 pairs finished the study

There were 94 MZ twins and 140 DZ twins

With a mix of male and female pp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What type of research was Brendgen (2005)

A

Longitudinal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When was data gathered

A

5, 18, 30, 48 and 60 months

And a follow up at 6 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the two ways Brendgen collected their data?

A

Two standardised questionnaires for the teachers

And from the twins peers via a booklet method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did the two questionnaires the teachers had to do measure?

A

One was to measure social aggression the other was to measure physical aggression

It is important to note teachers could only respond using a Likert scale and so quantitative data was gathered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did Brendgen (2005) gather data from the twins peers?

A

Via a booklet method

The peers were asked to identify certain behaviour descriptors with their classmates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were Brendgen (2005) findings?

A

The concordance rate for physical aggression was higher in MZ twins

The concordance rate for social aggression was equal in MZ and DZ twins

Those who had a higher physical aggression tended to have a higher social aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Definition of social aggression

A

Behaviour that is intended to hurt someone without physically touching someone

Examples include malicious gossip, taunting etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What do these findings suggest

A

Physical aggression has a genetic basis

Social aggression has an environmental basis

Also that some people have a genetic basis for aggression but that is only expressed when exposed to the right environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Generalisability of Brendgen (2005)?

A

High,

large number of pp

Low,

All children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reliability of Brendgen (2005)?

A

High,

Questionnaires can be easily repeated as they collected objective data, increasing reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Applicability of Brendgen (2005)?

A

Yes,

If we know social aggression is caused by the environment we can try and develop strategies to alter the environment to reduce social aggression

No,

Hard to apply this in society as society doesn’t have lots of controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Validity of Brendgen (2005)?

A

Low,

Only a correlation, which does not show causation, therefore results lack validity as the may not be accurate due to potential hidden/intervening variables

17
Q

Definition of physical aggression

A

Physical behaviour that is intended to physically hurt someone

Examples include punching kicking