Contamination Flashcards
- The statistics associated with full 17 loci matches will be reduced in cases where we encounter incomplete profiles, relatives and what else?
- What is missing from this sentence? What is the chance that a ———— ———- unrelated person would have the same DNA profile that we are seeing in the evidence sample?
- In contrast to the reference sample, we might expect to see a mixture in the ——— sample
- The allele count at a particular locus represents the number of repeating?
- Where only one peak is seen on the EPG, this is said to be?
- During the Pitchfork case, Jeffreys used a type of repeating (DNA) sequences, different to the ones used today. The repeated segments, in this case dozens or even 100 bases long can be observed. These are referred to as?
- The statistics associated with full 17 loci matches will be reduced in cases where we encounter incomplete profiles, relatives and mixtures.
- What is missing from this sentence? What is the chance that a randomly chosed, unrelated person would have the same DNA profile that we are seeing in the evidence sample?
- In contrast to the reference sample, we might expect to see a mixture in the evidence sample.
- The allele count at a particular locus represents the number of repeating base pairs.
- Where only one peak is seen on the EPG, this is said to be homozygous.
- During the Pitchfork case, Jeffreys used a type of repeating (DNA) sequences, different to the ones used today. The repeated segments, in this case dozens or even 100 bases long can be observed. These are referred to as minisatellites.
Why is contaminated DNA more likely to be detected
- The new multiplexes make the new DNA 17 multiplexes very sensitive
- Capable of detecting ever smaller amounts of DNA.
- The improved sensitivity of the new multiplexes means contaminated DNA is more likely to be detected.
- Understanding the mechanisms for contamination is an important part of a DNA 17 assessment.
Oxford dictionary definion of contamination
To make something impure by exposure or addition of a polluting substance.
The forensic process
Contamination
- Contamination is applied to the transfer of foreign DNA to the sample after the crime has been discovered.
- In this respect therefore, the term contamination is applied to the forensic process from scene attendance through to sample collection and sample testing
- Contamination does not relate to transfer from an innocent activity before the crime event.
- This is regarded as adventitious transfer and includes background levels of DNA for example, the DNA on a garment from the person who might have habitually worn it.
Contamination
If undetected
If undetected
1. Complicates interpretation
2. Increases the risk that a result which is incorrectly attributed
3. Or given undue significance
4. Potentially diminishing the value and reliability of the forensic evidence
How the contamination event affects the results depends upon the amount of contamination.
Consequences of contamination
- Could turn a single source sample into a mixed one
- Turn a sample with no result into a false positive.
Depending on the level of contamination
It could be a major or minor constituent.
One off versus blanket contamination
- It could be an incident that happens once and affects a single tube in a bacth of samples
- It could affect a whole batch of samples in a blanket contamination.
The DNA contamination event
Three criteria
Contamination, like any other DNA transfer event, requires three criteria to be fulfilled.
1. Firstly, there needs to be a source of DNA available to be involved in the transfer event
2. There needs to be an opportunity for DNA transfer to occur
3. There needs to be a mechanism by which the DNA transfer is achieved
Who does the first potention source of contamination concern?
Concerns the individuals involved in the different roles of the forensic process such as
* Police
* Scenes of Crime Officers
* Pathologists
* Forensic Scientists etc.
What is the second category that can cause contamination?
- Is that of the contaminating DNA originating from any consumables or reagent used in the forensic process and the environment in which the test is carried out.
- It is important to understand where our consumables are produced and the quality standards which are associated with their manufacture.
- Finally, we consider other forensic samples which are being processed concurrently within the laboratory environment.
- In this respect, having a quality managed lab process with appropriately trained staff is an essential requirement.
Opportunities for contamination
The opportunities for contamination can therefore be summarised in three different ways:
1. From person to stain
2. From consumable to stain
3. From stain to stain
The mechanisms for transfer
The mechanisms can operate by direct primary contact events or higher-level secondary transfer events.
Prevention of contamination
What does it require?
- Forensic practitioners can introduce tools to prevent and detect contamination should it occur.
- This requires knowledge of what could happen and where to look for it. In turn, this requires an understanding of how people work; the nature of consumables in use and the environment in which we operate.
Reducing opportunities for contamination
- Our processes and tools we use are aimed at reducing the opportunities and disrupting the mechanisms for contamination.
- For example, preventative measures may include the training of staff to a recognised standard and procurement of consumables from a source supported by quality standards.
- Detection methods include the introduction of elimination databases for laboratory staff as well as appropriate quality checks within the forensic process.